<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Every one of them was awesome</title>
      <link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaTalk post Every one of them was awesome</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:03:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Every one of them was awesome</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome</link>	
  	<description>Hey &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user/37996&quot;&gt;facetious&lt;/a&gt;, I have a question, and there&apos;s no email address in your profile:  Why did you go into a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46610&quot;&gt;10-month old thread&lt;/a&gt; on Sunday night and mark &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/favorites/37996&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;267 consecutive comments as &quot;Favorite&quot;&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mr_crash_davis</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339726</link>	
  	<description>Perhaps he &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; liked the thread. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And why would it matter anyway?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339726</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mr_crash_davis</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: pyramid termite</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339727</link>	
  	<description>because that&apos;s one of his favorite threads? ... it&apos;s one of mine, too, although i haven&apos;t marked it</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339727</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:04:16 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pyramid termite</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: NotMyselfRightNow</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339728</link>	
  	<description>One of mine, too.  I don&apos;t mean this as a callout--I&apos;m seriously curious about why.  He marked one of mine as a favorite, and I didn&apos;t think it was that good a comment.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339728</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: loquacious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339729</link>	
  	<description>Because he&apos;s hardcore!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339729</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: rxrfrx</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339733</link>	
  	<description>told you facetious was hardcore</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339733</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:25:48 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>rxrfrx</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dobbs</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339734</link>	
  	<description>Leave him alone. He was just being facetious.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339734</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:26:44 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Astro Zombie</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339737</link>	
  	<description>I marked them all as favorite too, but I was using a magic marker on my computer screen, so you may not have noticed.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339737</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:29:29 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Astro Zombie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Steven C. Den Beste</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339740</link>	
  	<description>What I want to know is how you discovered this?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339740</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:33:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Steven C. Den Beste</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: ericb</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339742</link>	
  	<description>words with 5 vowels in order:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
facetious&lt;br&gt;
--------------&lt;br&gt;
abstemious&lt;br&gt;
abstentious&lt;br&gt;
acheilous&lt;br&gt;
anemious&lt;br&gt;
annelidous&lt;br&gt;
arsenious&lt;br&gt;
caesious</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339742</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:34:58 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Rhomboid</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339743</link>	
  	<description>I&apos;m in ur mycology thread, faving all ur c0mments.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339743</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:42:25 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Rhomboid</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Alvy Ampersand</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339744</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;What I want to know is how you discovered this?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;He marked one of mine as a favorite...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Don&apos;t act like you don&apos;t check yours, SCDB.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;/Tabs over to member page, F5ing like all get out. &quot;C&apos;mon, validation! C&apos;mon...&quot;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339744</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:42:53 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Alvy Ampersand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: grouse</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339745</link>	
  	<description>You know, I bet it was some kind of link prefetching gone awry.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339745</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 14:46:31 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: reklaw</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339746</link>	
  	<description>Yeah, why would you go through and do it manually? Obviously just something got broken, probably to do with substandard &quot;speed up yuor interwebs!!1&quot; software.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339746</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:14:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Rhomboid</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339749</link>	
  	<description>Well, technically according to the HTTP specification, a GET request is never to be used for something that permanently changes state, such as adding a favorite or submitting an order or whatever -- POST method should be used for these.  The same thing happened when Google first announced their web accelerator app.  Admins of forums found that posts were randomly getting deleted, and all kinds of other unexplained gremlins.  It turns out the the GWA was spidering all the links on the page to pre-cache them.  Of course it did not spider POSTs, but only GETs, but these web forums were incorrectly using GETs to affect change in state, and so the result was chaos.  For this (and I believe also privacy concerns) Google had to immediately scale back and retract their GWA plans.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339749</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:27:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Rhomboid</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: IshmaelGraves</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339752</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;Yeah, why would you go through and do it manually? Obviously just something got broken, probably to do with substandard &quot;speed up yuor interwebs!!1&quot; software.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Substandard&quot; here meaning &quot;written in accordance with the spec?&quot; I&apos;m not actually going to mark someone&apos;s comment as favorite and watch the headers to see if there&apos;s some JavaScript wizardry going on, but on mouseover the &apos;favorite&apos; link sure looks like a GET.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Of course, it would be much easier for Matt to do the right thing if UAs let you style submit buttons properly. Or if the writers of specs would stop trying to tell developers what their pages should look like and give us &amp;lt;a method=&quot;post&quot; ... &amp;gt;, but that &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2005-May/003907.html&quot;&gt;doesn&apos;t seem likely&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;If I seem bitter, it&apos;s because I&apos;ve been putting off the task of going back through some code and changing all the links which submit POSTed forms to buttons so that the pages will be conformant for non-JavaScript-supporting UAs, like the GWA, and then writing the JavaScript to replace all of the buttons with elements with onclick handlers at load time so that it doesn&apos;t look like somebody&apos;s interface builder&apos;s controls toolbox took a shit all over the page to people using real web browsers.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339752</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>IshmaelGraves</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: nthdegx</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339753</link>	
  	<description>Give *me* the portobellos, you fucking cocksucker.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339753</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:47:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Cranberry</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339756</link>	
  	<description>I have a few comments in the mushroom thread. Now I assume I have a few comments marked fave. It&apos;s all good.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Note to facetious:have you looked up MeTa thread 9622?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339756</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:50:23 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Cranberry</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jessamyn</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339762</link>	
  	<description>wow ericb, I had always known two of those -- and bored my friends to death with that trivia every time they&apos;d use one of those words -- now I can really lay it on thick, thanks!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339762</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:03:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jonmc</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339763</link>	
  	<description>he marked a buncha mine as favorites, too. I knew it was too good to be true.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339763</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:07:05 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jonmc</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: ericb</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339766</link>	
  	<description>jessamyn, more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rinkworks.com/words/oddities.shtml&quot;&gt;fun&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fun-with-words.com/index.html&quot;&gt;with&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unusual_English_words&quot;&gt;words&lt;/a&gt;: &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://users.tinyonline.co.uk/gswithenbank/wordtriv.htm&quot;&gt;twyndyllyngs&lt;/a&gt;&apos; -- the longest word in the English language without any of the five main vowels; &apos;strengths&apos; -- the longest word with only one vowel.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339766</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:23:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: languagehat</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339783</link>	
  	<description>Now, see, that&apos;s why I get fed up with these cutesy sites&amp;mdash;you can&apos;t trust the info.  &lt;strong&gt;There is no such word as &lt;em&gt;twyndyllyng&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;  It is an alternate reading for &quot;twynlynge,&quot; i.e. &lt;em&gt;twinling&lt;/em&gt; &apos;twin,&apos; in a single fifteenth-century manuscript of &lt;em&gt;Catholicon Anglicum: an English-Latin wordbook&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;strong&gt;1483&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Cath. Angl.&lt;/em&gt; 399/1 A Twynlynge (A. Twyndyllyng), &lt;em&gt;gemellus&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If that&apos;s a word, then every misspelling anybody&apos;s ever made is a word.   Here, you want an even longer word without any of the five main vowels?  How about &lt;em&gt;tryptyswythygnyplyphs&lt;/em&gt;?  There it is, recorded for the ages.  Bah, humbug.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339783</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:55:50 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dersins</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339786</link>	
  	<description>Is &quot;latchstring&quot; OK with you, Mr. Hat?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339786</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dersins</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jessamyn</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339788</link>	
  	<description>what about &quot;anymore&quot;? I&apos;m used to it in negative contexts where you say something like &quot;we don&apos;t go there anymore&quot; but lately I&apos;ve heard it used in positive contexts like &quot;we still go there anymore&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
WTF?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339788</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:14:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mr_crash_davis</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339790</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I&apos;ve heard it used in positive contexts like &apos;we still go there anymore&apos;&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Slap them, hard.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339790</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mr_crash_davis</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Alvy Ampersand</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339796</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;There is no such word as twyndyllyng. It is an alternate reading for &quot;twynlynge,&quot;...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But I thought the fact that language is everchanging and evolving to suit people&apos;s needs and uses one of the beautiful things about it?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just as &lt;em&gt;irregardless&lt;/em&gt;, although informal, has taken the nation&apos;s tongues by storm and is recognized as a part of the lexicon, so shall twynlynge! &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yeah! Say it with me, people!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;/Runs and hides from The Wrath of the &apos;Hat&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339796</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:47:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Alvy Ampersand</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jonson</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339798</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;Now, see, that&apos;s why I get fed up with these cutesy sites...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Like a coiled tiger, he springs, etc, etc villagers decimated, etc, etc!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339798</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:54:17 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dg</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339799</link>	
  	<description>What language is that sentence from, jessamyn?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339799</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:58:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: vito90</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339803</link>	
  	<description>I know jessamyn can tell you that the queueing is the word in the English language with the most consecutive vowels.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339803</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:25:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>vito90</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mediareport</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339804</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;If that&apos;s a word, then every misspelling anybody&apos;s ever made is a word.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Whoa whoa whoa, languagehat. An &quot;alternate reading&quot; is hardly equivalent to a mispelling. I mean, it is right there in whatever dictionary you quoted, and &quot;mispellings&quot; hardly end up in dictionaries, do they?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339804</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:30:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Joseph Gurl</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339805</link>	
  	<description>And &quot;firetruck&quot; is the word in the English language that is most fun to use as a substitute for &quot;fuck.&quot;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339805</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:32:13 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Joseph Gurl</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cgc373</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339807</link>	
  	<description>jessamyn, here&apos;s a PDF called &lt;a href=&quot;http://r1.chass.utoronto.ca/twpl/pdfs/twpl18/TWPL18_Haycock.pdf&quot;&gt;&quot;Who&apos;s Positive Anymore?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; that explains &quot;anymore&quot; as a regional usage in the U.S. I heard a friend from Indiana use the word this way for months, puzzling the while, before looking up what he could have meant.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339807</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cgc373</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: pyramid termite</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339810</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;lately I&apos;ve heard it used in positive contexts like &quot;we still go there anymore&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
probably the person saying that is from philidelphia or baltimore</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339810</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pyramid termite</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: blue_beetle</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339812</link>	
  	<description>The person that uses &quot;anymore&quot; in that sense is obviously from the land of &quot;I-need-to-be-beaten-senseless&quot;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339812</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: sourwookie</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339813</link>	
  	<description>Because the thread is closed and it is the only remaining way to participate in its nonsensical spirit.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339813</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:13:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>sourwookie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: loquacious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339814</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;The person that uses &quot;anymore&quot; in that sense is obviously from the land of &quot;I-need-to-be-beaten-senseless&quot;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Pittsburgh? Cleveland? St. Louis? No? Hollywood!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339814</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:15:47 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: sourwookie</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339815</link>	
  	<description>Is there a way to write an Automator workflow to do such a thing?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just curious, not that I ever would....</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339815</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:16:30 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>sourwookie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: needs more cowbell</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339818</link>	
  	<description>I&apos;ve never heard &quot;anymore&quot; used in that sense during my 15 years in Baltimore.  The one person I know who uses it that way is from California.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339818</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:21:23 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>needs more cowbell</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: leftcoastbob</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339819</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;Just as irregardless, although informal, has taken the nation&apos;s tongues by storm and is recognized as a part of the lexicon, so shall twynlynge! &lt;br&gt;
posted by Alvy Ampersand&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I do not recognize it and never will.  You may say &quot;irrespective&quot; or you may say &quot;regardless,&quot; but if you say &quot;irregardless,&quot; I will be forced to look down on you.  I don&apos;t want to do so, but I must.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339819</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:22:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>leftcoastbob</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Skygazer</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339820</link>	
  	<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://users.tinyonline.co.uk/gswithenbank/wordtriv.htm&quot;&gt;Lighttight and hillypilly, each 10 letters long, are the longest words consisting only of letters with ascenders, descenders and dots in lower case.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Metafilter:  Ascenders, descenders and dots in lower case.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339820</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:23:04 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jonson</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339821</link>	
  	<description>and now popechuck has favorited every comment in this thread.  nice work, popechuck... nice work indeed.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339821</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:30:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: popechunk</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339823</link>	
  	<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;I&apos;m not nearly as obsessive as Gator&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339823</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:38:12 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>popechunk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cgc373</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339824</link>	
  	<description>That&apos;s pope&lt;strong&gt;chunk&lt;/strong&gt;, jonson.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339824</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cgc373</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Astro Zombie</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339825</link>	
  	<description>Omahans often use &quot;anymore&quot; to mean &quot;nowadays,&quot; which always sounded odd to me, but anymore I think it sounds all right.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339825</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:38:47 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Astro Zombie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: allen.spaulding</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339829</link>	
  	<description>When I first heard Cortex&apos;s latest opus I too was overwhelmed with such a love of this site that I wanted to hug every comment in that thread.  I, however, was drunk, and decided to urinate out of my window instead.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339829</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:54:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>allen.spaulding</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: IshmaelGraves</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339830</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;probably the person saying that is from philidelphia or baltimore&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Oh, it&apos;s spreading, I&apos;m afraid &amp;mdash; metastasizing, if you will. The elision of &quot;to be,&quot; however (as in, &quot;the laundry needs washed&quot;), remains a reliable Pennsylvanian regional indicator, though I&apos;m sure this can&apos;t last.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339830</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:04:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>IshmaelGraves</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jonson</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339831</link>	
  	<description>I prefer &quot;popechuck&quot;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339831</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:04:56 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: loquacious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339833</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;I, however, was drunk, and decided to urinate out of my window instead.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You!! You fucking fucker! You&apos;re the one! You&apos;re the one who keeps drenching my balcony in sour, beery piss and burning my goddamn ferns!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339833</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: popechunk</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339834</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;I prefer &quot;popechuck&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I must admit that it&apos;s growing on me, too.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339834</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:13:22 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>popechunk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Rhomboid</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339835</link>	
  	<description>I like popechuck too.  pope + upchuck = hilarity.  Although popechunk could possibly be pope + blow chunks.  And that would equal hilarity as well.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339835</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:13:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Rhomboid</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: popechunk</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339836</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;pope + upchuck = hilarity&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nah, I was thinking more along the lines of ABC Wide, Wide World of Sports with some huge guy hurling the pope ten meters across the snow for the win.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339836</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:14:46 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>popechunk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cgc373</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339837</link>	
  	<description>Sweet, a new derail! &lt;em&gt;And&lt;/em&gt; a new sport! If it were combined with some sort of high-rise pissing contest. . . .</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339837</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:16:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cgc373</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cgc373</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339838</link>	
  	<description>&lt;small&gt;That &quot;anymore&quot; paper I linked above talks about &lt;em&gt;Canadian&lt;/em&gt; usage, not U.S. regional usage. &lt;small&gt;I suck&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339838</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:19:04 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cgc373</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: popechunk</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339839</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;You!! You fucking fucker! You&apos;re the one! &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Faved. Totally faved.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339839</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>popechunk</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Stauf</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339840</link>	
  	<description>How many popes could a popechunk chuck if a popehcunk could chuck popes?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339840</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:23:07 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Stauf</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Mitheral</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339841</link>	
  	<description>&lt;b&gt;jessamyn&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&apos;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/12625#339762&apos;&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;em&gt;&quot;I had always known two of those -- and bored my friends to death with that trivia every time they&apos;d use one of those words -- now I can really lay it on thick&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was going to ask how often annelidous would come up in conversation until I looked it up and what do you know, it might actually be a useful word.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339841</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Mitheral</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jonson</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339842</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;Faved. Totally faved.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Pshh.  What ISN&apos;T faved &lt;em&gt;these &lt;/em&gt;days?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339842</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:27:48 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Civil_Disobedient</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339843</link>	
  	<description>They probably do that while drinking pop.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Damn shame what they did to their dad.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339843</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:29:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Civil_Disobedient</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: George_Spiggott</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339845</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;You!! You fucking fucker! You&apos;re the one! &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Shouldn&apos;t that read &quot;you firetrucking firetrucker?&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(I&apos;m completely stealing the firetruck thing from now on)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(And by the way, my use of &apos;completely&apos; instead of the more common &apos;totally&apos; is less out of some sad need to be different whilst being effectively the same than an homage to Michelle Meyrink, who famously observed that there was a complete hole through a treetrunk.)</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339845</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:33:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>George_Spiggott</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: blue_beetle</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339846</link>	
  	<description>popehcunk? Must be a regional dialect.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339846</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: allen.spaulding</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339848</link>	
  	<description>To me, popechunk sounds like a rare food item you can only get a exclusive clubs in London.  I&apos;ll have the seared popechunk and the beluga, Jeeves.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339848</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>allen.spaulding</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: loquacious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339852</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;small&gt;pope + upchuck = hilarity&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nah, I was thinking more along the lines of ABC Wide, Wide World of Sports with some huge guy hurling the pope ten meters across the snow for the win.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What? No popechucks? (They already have &lt;em&gt;nun&lt;/em&gt;chucks, y&apos;know.) It could be an even better idea than swordchucks!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Take a brief moment, close your eyes and imagine - really imagine - exactly how much ass you could kick if one end of the popechuck was 100% Genuine Pope and the other was 100% Genuine Antipope. That&apos;s a whole motherfiretrucking lot of kicked ass.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339852</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>loquacious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: AmbroseChapel</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339853</link>	
  	<description>Chuck Palahniuk uses &quot;anymore&quot; in that positive sense in at least one novel. He&apos;s from the Pacific Northwest, isn&apos;t he? Though of course it would likely have been in a character voice.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I can&apos;t remember which book but I&apos;m saying &quot;Choke&quot;. I&apos;ll look it up later.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339853</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:05:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>AmbroseChapel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: allen.spaulding</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339854</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;Take a brief moment, close your eyes and imagine - really imagine - exactly how much ass you could kick if one end of the popechuck was 100% Genuine Pope and the other was 100% Genuine Antipope.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yes, but how much chuck could a popechuck chuck if a pope chuck could chuck pope?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339854</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:06:09 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>allen.spaulding</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: The corpse in the library</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339856</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;Chuck Palahniuk...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
...not to be confused with Chuck Popeniuk.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339856</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:13:08 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>The corpse in the library</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: AmbroseChapel</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339857</link>	
  	<description>OK it&apos;s definitely in &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.ca/Diary-a-Novel-Chuck-Palahniuk/dp/product-description/1400032814&quot;&gt;Diary&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&quot;Today is the longest day of the year--but anymore, every day is.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
and he used it in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jeffwalsh.com/blog/2003/02/chuck_palahniuk.html&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Palahniuk only composes his novels long-hand, out in the world, and only keyboards them into his computer at home. And he certainly doesn&apos;t travel with a laptop computer.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Getting a laptop through the airport anymore is like getting an atomic bomb through an airport. I hate that,&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, blame Chuck.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339857</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:16:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>AmbroseChapel</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mrmojoflying</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339859</link>	
  	<description>Wouldn&apos;t it be really funny if facetious marked every answer in this thread +fave, but didn&apos;t respond?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339859</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:24:33 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mrmojoflying</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: bob sarabia</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339861</link>	
  	<description>Now that you said that, no.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339861</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:34:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>bob sarabia</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: persona non grata</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339862</link>	
  	<description>You&apos;re not yourself right now. Get over it. We have!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339862</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:53:28 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>persona non grata</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339873</link>	
  	<description>267, and none of them are mine. I never get to be favorite. Thanks a lot for that downer.  This is miserable. What a terrible day. I might as well quit. Good bye, everyone. Like any of you would care. Or notice.  :(</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339873</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:13:27 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339874</link>	
  	<description>I mean it!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339874</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:13:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339875</link>	
  	<description>Nobody cares about #19375. :(</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339875</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:15:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339876</link>	
  	<description>Don&apos;t stop me! I&apos;ll just be on my way.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339876</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:16:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339877</link>	
  	<description>...guys? Aw.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339877</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: carsonb</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339879</link>	
  	<description>I asked facetious:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;*scratches head*. *scratches beard*. mushroom thread - check. comment - check. fave ever - hm. Nope.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
*wonders if accidentally misspelling carbsonb twice is some sort of sympathetic reaction*&lt;br&gt;
posted by facetious at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/54523#1424430&quot;&gt;12:13 AM&lt;/a&gt; PST on September 5 [+] [!]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ooooooh. *gets it*. that is interesting, i didn&apos;t know i did that. i certainly didn&apos;t mean to.&lt;br&gt;
posted by facetious at &lt;a href=&quot;ooooooh. *gets it*. that is interesting, i didn&apos;t know i did that. i certainly didn&apos;t mean to.&quot;&gt;12:14 AM&lt;/a&gt; PST on September 5 [+] [!] &lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339879</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: carsonb</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339880</link>	
  	<description>oops, that second link is boofooed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/54523#1424431&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339880</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:29:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Cranberry</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339881</link>	
  	<description>TwelveTwo - didn&apos;t it seem ghostly quiet when you were pleading for a favorite? No one had been here for like 80 minutes!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am not a guy, but I marked a favorite for you. Now dry your eyes and step away from the edge. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Incidentally, facetious is over in the blue denying any knowledge of the favoriting that brought on this callout.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339881</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:30:53 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Cranberry</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Cranberry</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339882</link>	
  	<description>What carsonb said.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339882</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:32:35 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Cranberry</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: facetious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339883</link>	
  	<description>ok, i get it now. i saved the thread for posterity, and my dumbie pre-linking software did it on accident. *shame*</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339883</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:35:58 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>facetious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: facetious</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339884</link>	
  	<description>i wish i coulda told you there was a clever reason. but nope.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339884</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:37:30 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>facetious</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: TwelveTwo</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339885</link>	
  	<description>&lt;b&gt;Cranberry&lt;/b&gt; for really?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339885</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:43:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>TwelveTwo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: carsonb</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339886</link>	
  	<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/bestcheck.gif&quot;&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339886</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:46:37 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Serial Killer Slumber Party</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339907</link>	
  	<description>Now, a better thing facetious could have done was favourite every comment in that thread bar one. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Then just sit back and imagine that poor soul crying at his computer, waving one fist in the sky screaming &quot;Why?&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Bastard.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339907</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:01:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Serial Killer Slumber Party</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: NotMyselfRightNow</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339928</link>	
  	<description>Hey, it&apos;s not too late for him to do that.  Only 800 and some to go!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339928</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:47:25 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Kirth Gerson</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339948</link>	
  	<description>_spaulding, you haven&apos;t lived until you&apos;ve had Cajun Blackened Popechunk.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I just read a book where the author repeatedly used this construction: &quot;not this but nor that.&quot; I had never seen &quot;but nor&quot; before. Just me?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339948</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 07:33:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Kirth Gerson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mbd1mbd1</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#339977</link>	
  	<description>The word &lt;em&gt;bookkeeper&lt;/em&gt; has three consecutive sets of doubled letters.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My boss is from Baltimore and she uses the wacked &lt;em&gt;anymore&lt;/em&gt; construction.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-339977</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:46:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mbd1mbd1</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: StrasbourgSecaucus</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#340129</link>	
  	<description>POPOZAO</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-340129</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:08:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>StrasbourgSecaucus</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: meehawl</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#340196</link>	
  	<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;firetruck&quot; is the word in the English language that is most fun to use as a substitute for &quot;fuck.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No, it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feck&quot;&gt;feck&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Added bonus: also rude in Scots, Middle English, and Esperanto.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-340196</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:21:05 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>meehawl</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: raedyn</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#340203</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;Because the thread is closed and it is the only remaining way to participate in its nonsensical spirit.&lt;/i&gt; - sourwookie&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So true. I&apos;m putting my hand over my ears and going to believe that&apos;s the reason, just because.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;That &quot;anymore&quot; paper I linked above talks about Canadian usage, not U.S. regional usage. I suck.&lt;/i&gt; - cgc373&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yuck. I&apos;m Canadian and have never heard that construction. I can&apos;t make heads nor tails of the sentences that use it. Once I read the article I see that supposedly people from &apos;down East&apos; are using it. That explains it.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-340203</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:05:16 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>raedyn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: joedan</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12625/Every-one-of-them-was-awesome#340279</link>	
  	<description>Silly bullshit like this is why I love Metafilter.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12625-340279</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:20:27 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>joedan</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>