December 13, 2006

3:14 PM

Are rajbot, fishfucker and myself the only MeFites to look at Projects lately, or does everybody else here think everything posted there since 12/7 sucks? Just asking.
posted by wendell to etiquette/policy at 3:14 PM (21 comments total)

*crickets*
posted by mathowie at 3:20 PM on December 13, 2006

This will wendell...
posted by The God Complex at 3:21 PM on December 13, 2006 [2 favorites]

Was that a cricket I stepped on the last time I went to Projects?

Jiminy.

But I really like IRFH's blog and feel he/she/they should be encouraged to continue!

And I always end well.
posted by wendell at 3:30 PM on December 13, 2006

Hey, wow - thanks!
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 3:32 PM on December 13, 2006

Personally, I always forget to look at Projects. Thanks for the reminder!
posted by brundlefly at 3:35 PM on December 13, 2006

Did someone say wendell?

Also: Nobody goes there any more, it's too crowded.
posted by languagehat at 3:43 PM on December 13, 2006

Usually people space their Projects out, so they don't get lost in the clutter. Why were 8 posted yesterday? Bizarre.
posted by smackfu at 3:45 PM on December 13, 2006

I don't ever look at it. I don't know why.
posted by dame at 4:07 PM on December 13, 2006

Frankly, none of the stuff in the last few days looks super-amazing.
posted by grouse at 4:56 PM on December 13, 2006

Hey, wow - thanks!
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 4:59 PM on December 13, 2006

;
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 4:59 PM on December 13, 2006

Usually people space their Projects out, so they don't get lost in the clutter. Why were 8 posted yesterday? Bizarre.

Don't posts to Projects have to be approved? I just assumed Matt and Jessamyn only tackled the queue once or twice a week, and that's why they always showed in my feed in a group.

And yes, there's been some lameness. Don't dis your t-shirt competition if your own design is lame. I rarely want to snark on here, but I wanted to when I saw that shirt.
posted by booksherpa at 5:03 PM on December 13, 2006

Maybe there should be a [snark] link under the [vote for it] link.
posted by rajbot at 5:41 PM on December 13, 2006

I forgot to approve them for a few days and jessamyn stepped up to approve a bunch.

Projects is perfect for RSS. That's the only way I read the site, but I find unless something is amazing, I don't take the trip over to vote for something when I know I should.
posted by mathowie at 6:11 PM on December 13, 2006

I refuse to vote for any more projects until my MeFiComp CD arrives. *Shakes fist at Canada Post*

Also, there hasn't been a lot that's gotten me stiff in the nipples lately. No harm, no foul, just the way it goes.
posted by Alvy Ampersand at 7:49 PM on December 13, 2006

*crickets*

Ah, so that explains why you're opening Projects up to friends and family stuff. :)
posted by mediareport at 9:28 PM on December 13, 2006

I looked at it yesterday for the first time in a week or two, and voted on a couple. Hooray for me!
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 9:44 PM on December 13, 2006

I look at Projects maybe once every 1-2 weeks. With a) a low volume of posts, and b) no discussion to keep up with, that's about all that seems necessary.
posted by DevilsAdvocate at 10:05 AM on December 14, 2006

I quit looking when the "girlgator" went away. T'was a sad day.
posted by snsranch at 1:35 PM on December 14, 2006

Hmmm. Being Canadian, I read this as "since July 12" instead of since "December 12". I started patting myself on the back, since I posted my project in June and was thus part of the non-sucks club. But then I realized you weren't using metric dates.
posted by acoutu at 3:20 PM on December 14, 2006

Er, December 7.
posted by acoutu at 3:20 PM on December 14, 2006