<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Since when did Microsoft start using textads at the top of the MSN Portal? </title>
      <link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1453/Since-when-did-Microsoft-start-using-textads-at-the-top-of-the-MSN-Portal/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaTalk post Since when did Microsoft start using textads at the top of the MSN Portal?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:29:26 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:29:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Since when did Microsoft start using textads at the top of the MSN Portal? </title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1453/Since-when-did-Microsoft-start-using-textads-at-the-top-of-the-MSN-Portal</link>	
  	<description>Since when did Microsoft start using textads at the top of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msn.com&quot;&gt;MSN Portal&lt;/a&gt;? Granted, I don&apos;t visit MSN much, but weren&apos;t there banner ads up there in the not too distant past? Did they take a hint from MetaFilter and PyrAds?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.1453</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 18:35:34 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cCranium</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1453/Since-when-did-Microsoft-start-using-textads-at-the-top-of-the-MSN-Portal#18387</link>	
  	<description>I would suggest Google&apos;s had a stronger influence in the popularity of text ads.  Not to take anything away from MeFi or Pyra&apos;s influence, but Google is slightly more popular.  :-)</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.1453-18387</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 21:29:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cCranium</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: gleemax</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1453/Since-when-did-Microsoft-start-using-textads-at-the-top-of-the-MSN-Portal#18393</link>	
  	<description>Yes, but Google&apos;s ads are targeted, making them that much more effective than MeFi, Pyra, or MS. Of course, MeFi ads are cool because we&apos;re a community, and whoring incestuously.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t care if I see an ad for socks at MSN, unless I just happen to be looking for them. If I&apos;m searching Google for socks, however, the ads have a chance up popping up and earning a sale. Why I&apos;d search Google for socks is left as an exercise for the reader.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.1453-18393</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 22:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>gleemax</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: tomorama</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1453/Since-when-did-Microsoft-start-using-textads-at-the-top-of-the-MSN-Portal#18396</link>	
  	<description>Y&apos;know, I didn&apos;t even think of that. I&apos;ve never paid any attention to the ads on Google; I forget they&apos;re even there.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.1453-18396</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 22:43:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>tomorama</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>