Comments on: The demon lived at Mach 1

The demon lived at Mach 1

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:49:50 -0800

This is how it's done.

I just had to say I was pleasantly stunned at how this FPP works. I've read more than my share of front page posts and must admit to being rather jaded, but the poetic choice of words, and the attention-getting force behind the paragraph really work on a higher level than the usual fare. I'm not saying everything else has sucked before this one. I'm saying that most FPPs are from okay to good, and this one is exceptional. It wasn't too brief. It wasn't too long-winded. The chosen subject matter is innately compelling. It informs the reader what to expect from the links, but it also entertains as it does so. It does everything a FPP should do and then some. I wish there were an award that could be given for when a MeFite raises the bar on one's expectations. We are not worthy, fandango_matt, you beautiful bastard. If ever I make a FPP again, if not for a brief second, I know I'll find myself thinking of this post and wondering, does mine measure up against that at all? The answer will probably be no. Please feel free to disagree with me, using examples of front page posts in the Blue that in your opinion far exceed this one. Then I can argue with you and you can argue with me. It'll be fun! =)

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:59:08 -0800

Not to take away anything from what was a good post, but the text of that FPP comes directly from The Right Stuff, which I was slightly surprised not to see referenced but it's not a big deal.

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:59:16 -0800

Yeah, mad props to fandango_matt for transcribing the prologue to The Right Stuff.

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:00:21 -0800

It was referenced, obliquely you might say, and I say artfully, but it broke the sound barrier over ZachsMind's head, obvs.

By: Kwantsar

Kwantsar — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:19 -0800

Is this the point in the thread where someone posts a lengthy portion of a lengthier work, verbatim, into the thread? I like it when people do that sometimes.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:42 -0800

Oh for Pete's sake. CHOICE OF WORDS. I'm not saying he wrote it. I'm saying it works.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:46 -0800

Ah, you're right, the final YouTube link was from the movie.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:03:56 -0800

Hey, I'm not saying it didn't work, I'm saying that it's worth knowing where the actual text came from. If it's so poetic - and it is - why not mention the source?

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:06:43 -0800

Color me even more jaded now! If someone could take a passage from Mark Twain and use it as a compelling and useful FPP I'd be even more impressed. Sheesh. There's no pleasing you people.

By: Aloysius Bear

Aloysius Bear — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:07:37 -0800

Lifting the text of your FPP from someone else isn't cool if you don't give credit.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:12:34 -0800

It's cool if it works. I thought everyone knew. If he'd hit people over the head with the source, it woulda ruined the effect.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:13:32 -0800

It'd be like quoting the Gettysburg Address with patriotic music underneath it and then halfway through going, "oh by the way Abe Lincoln wrote this I'm just repeating it."

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:15:52 -0800

I think the attribution was sufficent, but alternately he might have put the whole thing in quotes to hint at its provenance. And sorry, ZM, but that style of FPP does happen all the time, so I'm not floored by that aspect of it. Great post, of course. The anniversary aspect surprised me pleasantly.

By: misha

misha — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:17:07 -0800

Hitting people over the head with the source doesn't ruin the effect, it gives credit where credit is due.

It's a great FPP, BTW, fandango_matt, and the quoted material is golden. But it isn't original, and a disclaimer that says as much would be welcome.

By: adrianhon

adrianhon — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:22:28 -0800

The quote is hardly as well-known as the Gettysburg address, and no-one was suggesting that attribution be placed directly into the middle of the post. When I saw it, I thought, hey, that's a cool post about something I'm interested in. You will note that I did not jump into the thread and say 'WTF this is stolen!'.

The only reason why I thought to mention it now is because you wrote this post praising it as the best FPP ever, mostly on the strength of its wording, inadvertently making it seem as if the poster wrote the words. If someone wrote an FPP that lifted directly from a poem or story, I would love to know who actually wrote it, if only to read more.

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:24:01 -0800

So, who can tell us whether it was written by Wolfe or Kaufman?

By: jayder

jayder — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:31:49 -0800

It is interesting that, on a website full of people who fancy themselves good writers, that when someone lifts, wholesale, a paragraph from a very skilled and celebrated writer, it immediately draws attention for its excellence.

A gentle reminder that old media, the world where writings are vetted for excellence and edited by professionals, hasn't been eclipsed, for pure quality, by user-generated stuff.

By: blacklite

blacklite — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:37:35 -0800

lol

By: It's Raining Florence Henderson

It's Raining Florence Henderson — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:42:32 -0800

All of my comments are written by Lincoln.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:54:05 -0800

*sigh*

I figured everyone knew it was from Right Stuff. I apologize that I didn't mention that in my FPP, but again, I feel that would have been distracting, as this argument is derailing from the original point. Not only was it a quote, it's a quote that serves the requirements of a good FPP. You couldn't do this with dialogue from It's A Wonderful Life or a poem by Emily Dickinson.

Negativland, Beck, countless rap artists, the list goes on, utilize material that they didn't build themselves out of wholecloth to create new art. They take pieces that were intended for other purposes and use them for entirely different purposes, thus making the old new again. Fangango Matt did the same thing with a MeFi post, and you're telling me that's not impressive?

By: Falconetti

Falconetti — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:57:48 -0800

I didn't know the source of the quote and I am glad someone mentioned it. Why are you taking so much umbrage?

[insert hushed reverence]

By: y2karl

y2karl — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:59:20 -0800

All of my comments are written by Lincoln.

Four comments and two hundred and fifty seconds ago...

By: kirkaracha

kirkaracha — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:59:46 -0800

Philip Kaufman wrote it. I've read the book and seen the movie several times, and I didn't remember it being from the book. Thanks to the miracle of Amazon's Search Inside technology, I think this is as close as Wolfe got:

Mel Apt died just a few minutes after he set his world speed record, the victim of a demon that was waiting especially for rocket ships reaching speeds of Mach 2 or more in the thin air up around 70,000 feet: instability in the yaw or roll axis...followed by an uncontrollable tumble.

By: wendell

wendell — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:07:35 -0800

A gentle reminder that old media, the world where writings are vetted for excellence and edited by professionals, hasn't been eclipsed, for pure quality, by user-generated stuff.

And it wouldn't even be a contest if those vetting and editing weren't doing such a piss-poor job so much of the time. All writing can benefit from the contribution of a good editor, but bad editors are part of what makes 'user-generated stuff' necessary.

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:07:54 -0800

I figured everyone knew it was from Right Stuff. I apologize that I didn't mention that in my FPP, but again, I feel that would have been distracting

Shenanigans!

By: Abiezer

Abiezer — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:12:58 -0800

By: googly

googly — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:32:23 -0800

I see two random brief youtube clips about breaking the sound barrier, some photos of Chuck Yeager, and another youtube clip from a major motion picture, all framed by a passage lifted from a best-selling novel.

Neat? Yes. Entertaining and informative? Sure. Exceptional, impressive, and worthy of its own positive MeTa callout? IMHO, not really.

By: lalochezia

lalochezia — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:06:21 -0800

This is how it's done? 4 extremely similar old youtube clips, and a filched piece of text.

Color me supersonically meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh.

By: Poolio

Poolio — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:20:08 -0800

Hey ZachsMind, you got any Beemans?

By: cortex

cortex — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:20:50 -0800

I apologize that I didn't mention that in my FPP

Minor pedantic aside: using "FPP" for posts to the front page of any site other than the blue, while logically reasonable, jars somewhat.

By: felix betachat

felix betachat — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:22:59 -0800

Color me supersonically meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh.

Shouldn't that be: meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

By: felix betachat

felix betachat — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:23:38 -0800

hmm. apparently the "big" tag works on preview but not on post. there's me with the wrong stuff.

By: BeerFilter

BeerFilter — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:27:45 -0800

Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show. To begin my life with the beginning of my life, I record that I was born (as I have been informed and believe) on a Friday, at twelve o'clock at night. It was remarked that the clock began to strike, and I began to cry, simultaneously.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:34:40 -0800

That's how it's done, BeerFilter! BEST OF THE WEB!!

By: caddis

caddis — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:39:50 -0800

The post was beautifully written. I skipped over it earlier today because it was all youtube links and I don't usually go for those unless their content is clearly spelled out. Based on Zach's praises I clicked a few. They are ho hum to me because I already know the story so well, but that does not take anything away from how well written the post was.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:59:54 -0800

Caddis: "Based on Zach's praises I clicked a few..."

Oh I totally agree the linkage was ho hum...

I didn't even click the links, cuz where I was at the time I first saw the post, youtube is *ahem* mildly frowned upon. I just thought the post itself was eye-catching and a great choice of words. It was riveting, and yet conveyed what to expect from the links.

Okay fine. I stand corrected. Fandango Matt's post was atrocious and a stain on the reputation of MeFitednessishness everywhere for everybody for all time. Please delete this thread and leave me in my shame.

yer all a buncha meanie beanies. =P

*wanders off to throw himself at oncoming traffic*

By: gwint

gwint — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:01:04 -0800

metatalk, the ultimate buzzkill.

By: caddis

caddis — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:10:43 -0800

Okay fine. I stand corrected. Fandango Matt's post was atrocious and a stain on the reputation of MeFitednessishness everywhere for everybody for all time. Please delete this thread and leave me in my shame. ;)

No, it was a good post and all the naysayers can go suck eggs.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:14:44 -0800

So it was well-written but the links were ho-hum? So what you're saying is that you really like Philip Kaufman.

By: Abiezer

Abiezer — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:16:57 -0800

I thought about a Giants post, but the links I found were fee-fi-fo-fum.
Shall I fuck off now?

By: Lentrohamsanin

Lentrohamsanin — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:25:11 -0800

I tried and failed to find a cite for the bloke who objected to the Stockton to Darlington railway on the grounds that steam trains would travel at such astounding speeds passengers' chests would collapse from the strain.

The way I heard it, they built fences around the railway, because that level of speed would cause brain damage and they didn't want onlookers to be distressed by the sight of a trainload of drooling mental cases hurling along at 35 miles an hour.

Of course, I heard that from Alan Davies on Qi, so it's probably almost entirely rubbish.

By: dhruva

dhruva — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:31:54 -0800

It's pretty much a hardwired rule of Metafilter: if you say that you like X, many many people will come along to say that X is crap.

By: KokuRyu

KokuRyu — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:32:51 -0800

Negativland, Beck, countless rap artists, the list goes on, utilize material that they didn't build themselves out of wholecloth to create new art.

Heh. Your FPP was good, but art it ain't. Quite honestly, I thought the language of it was a little out of place for MetaFilter, and am gratified to learn you lifted it from Tom Wolfe. Perhaps putting the text in italics would present a happy medium.

By: Abiezer

Abiezer — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:34:45 -0800

it's probably almost entirely rubbish
Let's not have such minor quibbles stand in the way of a good story.

By: Kwine

Kwine — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:36:28 -0800

You've got the right stuff. Baby.

By: cortex

cortex — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:38:24 -0800

Oh, that's crap, dhruva.

Wait, I—dammit!

By: dhruva

dhruva — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:40:43 -0800

heh.

By: caddis

caddis — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:48:10 -0800

*must read thread comments.

Now I see why it was well written; it was stolen. Oh well.

By: gleuschk

gleuschk — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:59:09 -0800

Minor pedantic aside: using "FPP" ~~for posts to the front page of any site other than the blue, while logically reasonable, jars somewhat~~ is bad and wrong and makes you a bad wrong person.

By: Poolio

Poolio — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:10:24 -0800

Philip Kaufman has a movie due out next year focusing on Richard Feynman's part in the investigation into the Challenger disaster. Feynman will be played by David Strathairn.

By: jonmc

jonmc — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:12:12 -0800

All of my comments are written by Lincoln.

How very Continental of you.

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:16:17 -0800

Metafilter: There's no pleasing you people.

By: Camofrog

Camofrog — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:26:45 -0800

What I learned from this thread:

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:35:32 -0800

Thanks for the compliments, everyone! As I mentioned in the FPP, The last link should have been this.

By: stavrosthewonderchicken

stavrosthewonderchicken — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:37:53 -0800

Everything's good and everything's funny, except for the stuff that's bad and wrong.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:11:33 -0800

MetaFilter: Your X sucks Y, and you're a Z.

By: peacay

peacay — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:37:56 -0800

-I figured everyone knew it was from Right Stuff.-

That assumption - 'I figured everyone knew...'- is characteristic of many an audience-restricting front page post, ironically.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:43 -0800

I also figure everyone knows when Penn staples a playing card to Teller's forehead with a pneumatic powered staple gun, it's not really magic, but that's plainly a foolish assumption, because Penn still has to repeatedly remind his audience just in case that none of their gags are real. It's all just for show, and meanwhile Teller's acting faint with blood spurting out of his head.

By: ZachsMind

ZachsMind — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:54:51 -0800

...it's fake blood actually. Just in case you didn't know.

*thud*

Oh, stop pretending Teller.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:18:18 -0800

I think you're reaching now, ZachsMind. Actually, your comment about Penn and Teller doesn't seem to have anything to do with the topic at hand. Sounds like you're just grabbing at straws to justify your initial position. I wouldn't worry about it though, everyone has their own definitions of what's good and what's not.

By: kirkaracha

kirkaracha — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:28:48 -0800

Philip Kaufman has a movie due out next year focusing on Richard Feynman's part in the investigation into the Challenger disaster. Feynman will be played by David Strathairn.
It's a perfect storm of awesomeness.

am gratified to learn you lifted it from Tom Wolfe
I wonder, not for the first time, if my comments are in invisible ink.

Your X sucks Y, and you're a Z.
A review of the latest Coldplay album?

By: spec80

spec80 — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:04 -0800

The more ZachsMind posts, the more I'm convinced that he had no idea it was from The Right Stuff and he's trying to cover his assumption. It's pretty amusing though.

FWIW, I had no idea it was from The Right Stuff.

By: Cranberry

Cranberry — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:00:41 -0800

*fandango_matt

By: pracowity

pracowity — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:30:44 -0800

The more ZachsMind posts, the more I'm convinced that he had no idea it was from The Right Stuff...

* picture of O RLY! owl *

Yes, I'm sure you're right. When he says "the poetic choice of words, and the attention-getting force behind the paragraph really work on a higher level than the usual fare," he's praising fandango_matt as author of the words.

There's no shame in not having seen or read The Right Stuff, ZachsMind, and it would have been funnier to admit you didn't know and then say the Yeager post was, after all, just a stolen quote and a collection of crap links.

By: blacklite

blacklite — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:10:53 -0800

Yeah, ZachsMind, you're kind of outing yourself as a total nutbar. You may as well just confess.

On the other hand, what the hell criteria were you judging it by, anyway? You didn't even click the links? So it was some nice words? Pretty words do not a post make.

By: Lentrohamsanin

Lentrohamsanin — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:24:56 -0800

In regards to my comment above:

-"Alan Davies" should be "Alan Davis".
-"Hurling" should be "hurtling".

It was late/I was tired.

By: Lentrohamsanin

Lentrohamsanin — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:27:36 -0800

Oh no wait, it is Alan Davies. And hurling could be technically correct, though hurtling was what I was aiming for.

It is early/I am tired.

By: markr

markr — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:03:53 -0800

The best part of this is that Zach's post basically says "I think this is ace, if you disagree why not show us some FPPs you thought were ace?" I came in here hoping for 66 (at the time) examples of great FPPs. Instead it's just everyone pointing out that Zach's favourite band sucks. It's like a perfect summary of Mefi in just one thread.

By: Dillonlikescookies

Dillonlikescookies — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:24:08 -0800

i was talking to this guy who was like "i like beans on a plate" and i was like "no wai whatever bean-fancier get the hell outta my log cabin!" and he was like "can't a guy give some ups around here without you being all in his face?! and i said;

"no, for this is metafilter, and if you post something and I click on it, you OWE ME A DEBT STRONGER THAN BLOOD that must be repaid with content sufficient for the precious minutes I could have spent otherwise wasting time on the internet! God help you if you express an opinion, for stating ANY opinion at all is a violent act that must be reprimanded equally violently!"

and he said "woah, i was just trying to tell you something was cool"

and i was like "that's not what this place is for AT ALL!"

that guy was such a jerk.

By: Armitage Shanks

Armitage Shanks — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:53:21 -0800

Instead it's just everyone pointing out that Zach's favourite band sucks.

To be fair, his favorite band did turn out to be Beatlemania.

By: pineapple

pineapple — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:16:13 -0800

Agree that Fandango Matt should have used quotation marks in the FPP at least, or credited in an early comment in the thread. Agree that ZachsMind (along with others in the thread) seem to not have realized it was a quotation until it was too late.

Think that everyone who is going the direction of "MetaFilter is juth too thenthitive!!!! You're all bean-overthinking cotton-headed ninnymuggins!!!" should re-read Zach's own words:

"[Blah de blah, best of web, amazingly written, blah de blah] Please feel free to disagree with me, using examples of front page posts in the Blue that in your opinion far exceed this one. Then I can argue with you and you can argue with me. It'll be fun!"

He got exactly the discussion he came here looking for; it just happened to be on an FPP that was improperly attributed and a subsequent call-out that was misplaced. Why, exactly, does that make us buzzkillers?

You people have gone soft.

By: breezeway

breezeway — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:40:24 -0800

This is how it's done.

I just have to say I was pleasantly stunned at how this MeTa thread works. I've read more than my share of posts to the grey and must admit to being rather jaded, but the poetic choice of words, and the attention-getting force behind the paragraph really work on a higher level than the usual fare. I'm not saying everything else has sucked before this one. I'm saying that most MeTa posts are from okay to good, and this one is exceptional.

By the way, I ripped this text off here.

By: prostyle

prostyle — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:12:58 -0800

=)

Negativland, Beck, countless rap artists, the list goes on, utilize material that they didn't build themselves out of wholecloth to create new art. They take pieces that were intended for other purposes and use them for entirely different purposes, thus making the old new again. Fangango Matt did the same thing with a MeFi post, and you're telling me that's not impressive?

=P

Big ups, big ups

By: languagehat

languagehat — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:14:59 -0800

The more ZachsMind posts, the more I'm convinced that he had no idea it was from The Right Stuff

Yeah, that's pretty clear. And it boggles my mind that he thinks a post is great even though he doesn't care about the links. Do you have any idea what MeFi is about, ZM?

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:22:03 -0800

fandango_matt quoted Right Stuff
ZachsMind said "yo, that shit is tough!"
Though it's most likely wrong
Zach said "knew all along!"
But the Mefi crew called ZachsMind's bluff

By: KevinSkomsvold

KevinSkomsvold — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:26:47 -0800

lol
posted by blacklite at 5:37 PM on October 14

Hey I wrote that! Time to lawyer up, pardner.

By: Ambrosia Voyeur

Ambrosia Voyeur — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:34:42 -0800

I've had my eye on ZM for BS before. Not everything can be fixed by yammering about it more.

By: spec80

spec80 — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:06:06 -0800

Ya know, now that you guys have pointed it out, I have never seen myself and Captain Obvious in the same room at the same time... *strokes chin*

By: blue_beetle

blue_beetle — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:09:09 -0800

There was a demon that lived on the web. They said whoever challenged him would die. Their keyboard would freeze up, their egos would buffet wildly, and they would disintegrate. The demon lived at Metafilter.com on the net, seventy four point fifty three point sixty eight point one hundred thirty, where the clueless could no longer move out of the way. He lived behind a barrier of snark through which they said no man could ever pass. They called it MetaTalk

By: mediareport

mediareport — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:29:01 -0800

Ok, ok, Zachsmind stands revealed as overly excitable, or something. Yeesh. Let's move on.

By: KevinSkomsvold

KevinSkomsvold — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:35:16 -0800

In defense of ZM, I've known him since MetaFilter existed only on granite slabs and our comments had to be posted using a hammer and chisel. This post is similar to some of the ones I've wanted to post when a particular item tickles my fancy or seems to rise above the rest. I'd never knock enthusiasm and I believe that this post was nothing more and nothing less.

By: Kirth Gerson

Kirth Gerson — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:54:17 -0800

kirkaracha, your invisible ink problem may be a result of this.

By: flapjax at midnite

flapjax at midnite — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:53:32 -0800

Ok, ok, Zachsmind stands revealed as overly excitable, or something. Yeesh. Let's move on.

I'd never knock enthusiasm and I believe that this post was nothing more and nothing less.

Personally, I heartily agree with these statements, but I think a lot of folks here are really just giving ZM a little friendly ribbing for what they see as him trying to cover his tracks on the author of the FPP (fandango_matt or Tom Wolfe). I don't see where it's a viscious pile on or anything, and I'd add that I've seen ZM himself gleefully join in on at least one pretty merciless pile on in the past...

Taste of. One's own medicine. All that.

By: blacklite

blacklite — Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:12:22 -0800

Taste of. One's own medicine. All that.

Form of. Big ups.

By: Opus Dark

Opus Dark — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:38:55 -0800

Do you have any idea what MeFi is about, ZM?

'hat, are you currently being paid fifty cents an hour to edit a Polish restaurant menu into an epic three-volume fantasy entitled 'Lair of the White Sausages', or are you naturally just a swollendicker meaner than I wish you were?

#1122543 UU - Ultimately Unanswerable - see Jack Littleman's 'Telling a Linebacker He Chews too Loudly' for further analysis.

By: i_cola

i_cola — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:37:24 -0800

Then I can argue with you and you can argue with me. ~~It'll be fun!~~ I'll get really frustrated!

By: whuppy

whuppy — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:53:46 -0800

Whatever, dudes. I saw the post and recognized the quote immediately. It made me happy to be reminded of one of my favoritest films evar. Thanks, ZachsMind!

By: flabdablet

flabdablet — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:42:20 -0800

I got a favorite and a "ftw" for this reframing of one of vacapinta's links as a semi-obscure pop culture reference. Does that count?

By: languagehat

languagehat — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:39:42 -0800

Opus Dark: Yeah, I may have been a trifle harsh. Let me rephrase: ZM, you might want to take a minute to think about what MeFi is about. Hint: it's not post format.

By: koeselitz

koeselitz — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:36:23 -0800

flapjax: "I don't see where it's a viscious pile on or anything...

Me neither. And that's precisely where my outrage starts.

The lack of viscous pile-ons here lately has been appalling. I'm left sitting here all alone holding my unopened bottle of grapeseed oil, seething with embarrassment.

By: breezeway

breezeway — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:48:37 -0800

THERMAL BREAKDOWN! THERMAL BREAKDOWN! NEED VISCOSITY, STAT!

By: fandango_matt

fandango_matt — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:12:49 -0800

*oils up languagehat, unrolls the Slip-N-Slide*

By: languagehat

languagehat — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:28:57 -0800

Whee!

By: pokermonk

pokermonk — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:58:51 -0800

lolz this thread.

By: ulotrichous

ulotrichous — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:15:23 -0800

ZM? More like BM!