Can I hide a thread? April 9, 2012 11:26 AM   Subscribe

Is there a script I can use to hide a particular thread? It's freaking me out and telling myself not to click isn't working.
posted by Wordwoman to MetaFilter-Related at 11:26 AM (28 comments total) 4 users marked this as a favorite

Not something built in to the site. Unfollow it in your recent activity if you've commented in it but that's about it. Maybe browse AskMe via MyAsk until the thread rolls off the front page?
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 11:29 AM on April 9, 2012


Depending on what browser you're using, you can get a program like Chrome Nanny and block the URL?
posted by brainmouse at 11:30 AM on April 9, 2012


Oh my. I was going to say it can't be that bad but I looked and only got to suggestion two. And I think I might have nightmares now. Good call on the avoidance.
posted by bquarters at 11:35 AM on April 9, 2012 [1 favorite]


For those who don't want to click in order to find out what's disturbing:

It's a listing of true crime books that contains discussion of disturbing true crimes.
posted by LobsterMitten at 11:45 AM on April 9, 2012 [1 favorite]


Thank you, cortex, for killing the chatfilter.
posted by Melismata at 11:48 AM on April 9, 2012


Can we also not talk about examples in this thread?
posted by tzikeh at 12:18 PM on April 9, 2012


Seriously. The OP said they were disturbed by what was in that other thread. Do not, therefore, produce disturbing material in this thread. Thank you.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 12:21 PM on April 9, 2012 [5 favorites]


You're right, jessamyn. I should never have mentioned Fox News.
posted by octobersurprise at 12:56 PM on April 9, 2012 [6 favorites]


All is forgiven.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 1:05 PM on April 9, 2012


Also, nobody is stoning anyone until I blow this whistle. Even if they do say Jehovah.
posted by Curious Artificer at 1:12 PM on April 9, 2012 [7 favorites]




KokuRyu, I read that as "Enter the Void" and thought, man, what in the hell are you doing.
posted by jbickers at 2:01 PM on April 9, 2012 [8 favorites]


Thanks for pointing me to that thread! I love that stuff.
posted by desjardins at 2:18 PM on April 9, 2012 [8 favorites]


Paz de la Huerta is the human equivalent of that Dalek relaxation video.
posted by griphus at 2:44 PM on April 9, 2012 [1 favorite]


Well, not sure if this will help sufficiently, but if you use Greasemonkey, I've just made a little script to hide that particular thread from Ask Metafilter's list of threads.

The main problem is that it takes about a brief moment to work - maybe a quarter second or so, at least on my machine - during which the thread will be visible on the list (if that part of the list happens to be in your browser window, as opposed to above or below the window).
posted by Flunkie at 5:02 PM on April 9, 2012 [1 favorite]


I'm also someone who didn't need to read that thread.
But somehow just the existence of this thread is helping me not perversely want to go back in there. So, thanks.
posted by bleep at 5:23 PM on April 9, 2012 [2 favorites]


Be strong, do not go there bleep. Nix, nix.
posted by madamjujujive at 5:35 PM on April 9, 2012


Well done, bleep!
posted by Glinn at 6:04 PM on April 9, 2012


griphus: "Paz de la Huerta is the human equivalent of that Dalek relaxation video."

Dalek. Relaxation. Video.

I understand each word, but combined in a sentence it's just paradoxical gibberish.
posted by zarq at 6:28 PM on April 9, 2012


Wait a few hours and it'll roll off the front page.
posted by Chocolate Pickle at 6:36 PM on April 9, 2012


griphus: "Dalek relaxation video"

o.O
posted by zarq at 6:44 PM on April 9, 2012


You like Paz? here's the poster for her new movie.
posted by 5_13_23_42_69_666 at 7:13 PM on April 9, 2012


That metafilter thread prompted me to put a few books on my to-read shelf and to see if a few books were available at my local library. I wonder if the mods would be OK with a new, different metatalk thread wherein we COULD talk about the thread? Or no?
posted by two lights above the sea at 8:43 PM on April 9, 2012 [1 favorite]


This is a joke, right? The punchline is you asking for a script to stop you deleting the first script?
posted by obiwanwasabi at 3:24 AM on April 10, 2012


I don't get it... there is nothing particularly gory in that thread, just short descriptions of content. To really get grossed out you would need to follow links, do image searches, read excerpts on Amazon, etc. So how can that freak you in and of itself?

And come to think of it, the guy asking the question is kind of working at cross purposes to his own mental health as well. "Tell me about what I shouldn't read?" WTF? Then why do you find yourself reading Helter Skelter, which you know is all about a serial killer and his cult of killers, when that is something you don't like to know about?

And now we get this additional layer, tell me how to hide from the guy who wants to hide from a list of gruesome topics that somehow I can't not read about, do I understand correctly?

Maybe it would be more useful long term to work on willpower, or something?

But hey, whatever, no biggie. Just strange.
posted by Meatbomb at 5:49 AM on April 10, 2012


I wonder if the mods would be OK with a new, different metatalk thread wherein we COULD talk about the thread? Or no?

I'd say no, unless there is a reason you think the thread fits into any of the MetaFilter categories? This odd business about single MeFi or AskMe or MeTa posts spawning multiple MeTa posts is sort of ungreat. I'd suggest MetaChat which is more set up for this sort of thing. Here is a story about willpower.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 5:55 AM on April 10, 2012


the guy asking the question

Hi!

is kind of working at cross purposes to his own mental health as well.

Maybe? I guess? It seems useful to me to have an idea of books that are particularly brutal.

Then why do you find yourself reading Helter Skelter, which you know is all about a serial killer and his cult of killers, when that is something you don't like to know about?

Because... I didn't actually know that! I didn't really know anything about the subject (I mean, that's generally why I read non-fiction books). And because even if I had known, I've often found books that contain troubling subject matter to be helpful to my understanding of the true nature world, and humanity, and society, and notions of justice, &c. &c. Without already knowing what was in the book, there was no way for me to know that what was in the book. Right?

Re: the question itself: I did not intend to freak anybody else out, and for that (Wordwoman, bquarters, anybody else who got the fantods) I'm sorry. For reals.
posted by davidjmcgee at 6:03 AM on April 10, 2012 [3 favorites]


You like Paz? here's the poster for her new movie.

Oh my.
posted by griphus at 9:02 AM on April 10, 2012


« Older BIGGAR!   |   Much love to all of MeFi! Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments