Comments on: spawn-of-metafilter advice site

spawn-of-metafilter advice site

taz — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:30:11 -0800

How about a spawn-of-metafilter advice site? A site where mefites can go to give and get advice and suggestions regarding life's conundrums - technical, personal, financial, etc.? Most of us know a thing or two about something or the other, and most of us need a hand (or a shoulder, or other assorted body parts) on occasion. Who you gonna call?

Do any of you "philter" people have the inclination and bandwidth for an idea like this (Wendell? Metalifter?)? Would any of the rest of you participate? And... did I just commit metacide?

By: stavrosthewonderchicken

stavrosthewonderchicken — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 06:39:53 -0800

Some previous discussions on this topic :

Would anyone be interested in having a new MetaTalk topic where we could ask advice and opinions of each other?

I think there's evidence of a real divide among mefi users, between people who like the links and people who like the discussion.

Ask Metafilter? Metatech? How soon to "My modem doesn't work!" posts?

What does "topics specific to metafilter" mean, exactly?

By: taz

taz — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:02:47 -0800

Thanks, stavros (and, boy, are you fast!); it looks like there was a lot of interest in this in 2001. I was thinking that the recent advent of the whole "philter" thing might make it easier to actually realize such an idea at this point.

By: sailormouth

sailormouth — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:14:58 -0800

The most recent (June, 2003) talk on this did not go far.

By: bshort

bshort — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:09:46 -0800

Actually, wouldn't BlogRoots cover a lot of the technical side of this sort of site?

Matt, any chance you'll be adding an AskMeta feature to the MeFi empire?

By: VulcanMike

VulcanMike — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:37:34 -0800

http://www.fatwallet.com/ ain't a bad place for these sorts of things, though it's a "savings" site. There's a finance section as well as other boards. FatWallet has a really diverse community, so the breadth of knowldege can sometimes be surprising.

By: y6y6y6

y6y6y6 — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 11:55:55 -0800

One problem (if Matt doesn't do it) is getting a dump of the MeFi user/password list. Without that everyone would have to register again at the new site. And you'd have to trust that everyone wouldn't steal someone else's username. And it would be impossible to keep out non-MeFi users.

Pretty cool idea apart from that big gaping hole.

One of the nice things about MetaFilter is the closed nature. That makes it more community and less Usenet. Which in turn makes the potential advice more valuable.

By: silusGROK

silusGROK — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:10:50 -0800

There are a number of extra-curricular mefi groups out there. One of which is the Metafilter tribe over at TRIBE.net... and we're discussing it here.

y6y6y6: I can't imagine that any solution would not require an additional sign in... as for policing, it's easy enough to do, especially in a moderated group.

By: thirteen

thirteen — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:50:19 -0800

Would anyone be interested in having a new MetaTalk topic where we could ask advice and opinions of each other?

Hey, one of mine from before I became evil!

By: dg

dg — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:24:42 -0800

most of us need a hand (or a shoulder, or other assorted body parts)
So, could we sign up for specific body parts of our favourite MeFite, or is it all just random?

This would be an interesting feature, but would require a great deal of trust from all concerned. People are already worried that a future (or potential, or current) employer could track down their deep, dark secrets as it is, without asking for advice on anything important to them in a public forum. Maybe it would work for providing advice on tech issues or other impersonal matters, but that is available in umpteen dozen places already. Personally, I would probably use it for this, being too lazy to search the nooks and crannies of the web for help, due mainly to having done that and finding that the quality of advice available is spotty at best.

Really though, this is kind of like the "how many real users are there here?" thing. It holds a little bit of interest to some, a lot to a few and most just go "meh, whatever". At the end of the day, would it add to the community that is MeFi, or would it just be another place to whine?

By: Hildago

Hildago — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:40:22 -0800

I don't want any of you giving me advice.

By: silusGROK

silusGROK — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:56:45 -0800

But Hildalgo... you just cry out for it!

By: Hildago

Hildago — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:32:36 -0800

You sound just like my state-mandated psychologist.

By: timeistight

timeistight — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:07:01 -0800

meh, whatever

Boy, dg, wait until you think something would be cool.

By: dg

dg — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:20:38 -0800

wait until you think something would be cool.
I do think it would be cool, actually. I doubt that many others would, though.

By: timeistight

timeistight — Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:39:52 -0800

I just kidding around, dg. I'm bored with the idea already.

By: i_cola

i_cola — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 06:07:19 -0800

I've been thinking on this since the last MeTa thread & was gearing up to do a follow up so thanks to taz & stav.

As has been already mentioned, the key to Meta- over Everyotherfilter, is the community/user base.The 'problem' I see with the other 'filters/Wiki's/TRIBEs &c. is that they are independent spinoffs from MeFi. For a KnoFi or AsFi (I like the sound of that. Ass-Fi. *hurh* hurh*) to work as well as MeFi & MeTa do, it has to be a part of the blue/grey.

Coding-wise (and I'm about to expose my total lack of knowledge regarding the way MeFi is coded!) I'm guessing that it's a case of adding an MetaKnowledge section based on a similar structure to MeTa. Not sure on bandwidth/server requirements - important points tho'. Host elsewhere? Funding drive for kit? &c.

The bottom line is down to Matt wanting it to be so. Or what it takes to persuade him (dosh, time, dancing boys/girls, Pacific island &c.).

Personally, I think AsFi would be a good addition to the community and would be willing to pony up cash &/or some time to organise. Is this something that could be developed on the MeFi Wiki?

Just my 2.5 cents.

By: walrus

walrus — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 06:42:13 -0800

Matt's previous objection to this idea was that it would soon be overrun by crack-whores or somesuch, because he would ignore it. I don't think anything has magically happened to change his mind, so am guessing it's a non-starter. If a bolt of lightning should now strike me down on the spot, then you will know I have blasphemed.

By: MrMoonPie

MrMoonPie — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 06:46:33 -0800

walrus...walrus?!?

Oh, shit.

By: walrus

walrus — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:17:00 -0800

Nah, still OUCH...........

By: i_cola

i_cola — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:25:39 -0800

walrus: In them days [Jan '01] signups were free 'n' easy so I can see his point.

walrus ?

....walrus...?

By: moss

moss — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:27:48 -0800

Isn't this different from the earlier suggestions in that it would be a separate site, presumably maintained by someone else, like SportsFilter or KittenFilter?

By: quonsar

quonsar — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:41:09 -0800

FilterFilter: Nothing Gets Through This Shit

By: dg

dg — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 15:52:08 -0800

The big stumbling block with this idea, which I think would be a great resource, is that it needs to be tied to the MeFi user database to avoid being overrun by crack whores and teenage girls. Exclusionist? Yes. Is that bad? I don't think so.

Is it possible to use something like MetaPhilter and still use the MeFi database to validate users?

By: stupidsexyFlanders

stupidsexyFlanders — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:09:56 -0800

What might be fun is if Matt picked a particularly interesting question, say one a week, and posted it for the group to blather on about. It would not be that much extra moderation work for him, the questions would presumably be high quality (mm, that Mathowie filter action), and they could be anonymized if necessary since they're going through Matt anyway.

Or Matt could designate somebody, or a rotating crew of somebodies, to select the question and moderate the answers. All this could be done within the existing MeTa codebase, seems to me.

By: y6y6y6

y6y6y6 — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 16:38:15 -0800

"The big stumbling block with this idea is that it needs to be tied to the MeFi user database"

Again, I agree. And if we could get around that (and I don't think having Matt pass out the user database would be a good idea) I'd be happy to write and host it myself. Especially since there seems to be a clamor lately for a "MeFi Overflow" website.

However.......... We've been ignoring another stumbling block - This sort of thing already exists and either it doesn't get used, or it gets ignored by the people who keep clamoring for it.

WarFilter was suppose to be an overflow for the Iraq posts. But of course it hasn't put a dent in the Iraq posts here. In fact WarFi members will bring the good stuff from WarFilter over and post it here.

#mefi would be a good overflow. But it doesn't seem to fill the need.

The forums over at MFDistilled are open for whatever people want to babble about. But they don't get used much. Same for Yahoo Groups, etc etc.

My point is that if Matt doesn't build it, they won't come. People ask for an overflow, but they don't use the ones that already exist.

By: dg

dg — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 17:15:31 -0800

Probably true, y6³.

By: y6y6y6

y6y6y6 — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 20:52:19 -0800

"Is it possible to use something like MetaPhilter and still use the MeFi database to validate users?"

Probably. I've never done it in SQL Server, but in MySQL it's fairly easy to create a user account to the database that can be granted read-only access to specific tables from a remote server. So, in theory, Matt could let other sites athenticate people using his database.

But of course this is a big ol' can o' worms, and if someone asked me to let them do it I would laugh and beat them out the door with flounder.

So yes, it should be straight forward. Don't hold your breath.

By: bshort

bshort — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 21:28:13 -0800

Yep, this is The Network Effect in action.

No one wants to go to an overflow site because no one posts at an overflow site.
No one posts because no one hangs out at an overflow site.

Rinse, etc.

It seems like a nice addition to The Metafilter Network would be a MeFi validation feature that would enable affiliate sites to have the ability to authenticate a MeFi user through some sort of mechanism (form submission, cookie hash, XML-RPC, etc.).

That way, a MeFi login could be a login for a variety of other 'Filters. Users would have one login, reputations and usernames (for better or for worse) would span sites, etc.

Of course Skippy would most likely need to be cloned, and there would have to be ponies for everyone...

By: taz

taz — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 22:49:05 -0800

y6, I think Sportsfilter is doing well, though... The thing with something like Warfilter is that people can just as well post the war stuff here. But we definitely can't make posts asking for any kind of help or advice, so maybe it has more of a chance of working out.

Regarding the Mefi database, assuming that we need to rule out any kind of direct access, that would leave straightforward signups or signups with approval. Let's say that signup approval consisted of simply checking the applicant email against the Mefi user page email. I will assume that this is not something that could be automated, so that would require a volunteer/some volunteers. Is there a way that more than one volunteer could work with this? Anyway, if it turns out that you wanted to do this, I would volunteer for signup approval duty...

More importantly, though, remains the basis of your concern: is there enough interest to make efforts worthwhile? I don't know. All I know is that there have been very many occasions when I would have loved to ask for help or advice from this group, and it seems that a lot of others feel the same way. But, is there enough motivation to go offsite to do it?

By: y6y6y6

y6y6y6 — Tue, 05 Aug 2003 23:31:52 -0800

"a MeFi validation feature that would enable affiliate sites to have the ability to authenticate a MeFi user"

This would be very nice. It would let others build and maintain tools which could be used by the community. And with no added work for Matt.

Not sure how such a validation tool would be built in reality though. I suggest someone build a working demo. Someone else I mean.

By: dg

dg — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 04:49:54 -0800

I second the motion that someone else do it. I will certainly make use of it if someone does. I have a server with some space and some bandwidth if someone would care to donate a domain. Would the budding community from tribe.net serve the purpose, though? It does not use the MeFi user database, although manual validation is done of MeFi usernames. apart from the fact that we have ended up with way too many miguels and toms that are certainly going to make things complicated.

By: plep

plep — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:44:25 -0800

I really think this would be interesting to try (and I might be interested in participating myself...)... good ideas all....

By: plep

plep — Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:47:24 -0800

(also to answer your question taz - speaking personally, I'd be interested in going offsite to do this).

By: wendell

wendell — Thu, 07 Aug 2003 02:19:30 -0800

If anybody wants to use metalifter.com for this (or anything), feel free to contact me at my userpage e-mail, if I'm not in a hospital room with heart monitors and no computers allowed... sigh..)