I hope Matt doesn't spare the thread just because people have put recipes in it.I disagree. It is a week post, but, for whatever reason, it succeeded in generating good discussion, which, at least to me, makes up (partially) for a weak fpp. Deleting it now would be wasteful.
My late ex-grandmother-in-law also called every woman who dated or married one of her sons or grandsons "Trixie". It saved her from trying to remember all their names.But I also particularly like all the rest. And I can't remember my first memory either.


I have 4 editions of the Joy: one from the 40's, one from the 50's; the 75 edition, and this one. The 50's & 75 eds are improvements on the original; they retain most of the best recipes, while updating certain sections and techniques. Not so with the "new" edition! Fewer than half of the original recipes are retained, and whole sections (Canning, Game) have been eliminated. While some of the new recipes are good, and the expanded vegetarian offerings are nice, this is no longer the Joy of Cooking that I've known and loved since I first learned to cook. All in all, disappointing.So don't be so fucking sure of things, OK?
MetaFilter no longer has anything to do with filtering the web.The assumption being that the web is worth filtering any more. ;-P
when it devolves into a constant barrage of unfunny jokes its just a waste of time that you will only read once.Gee, you finally get it. This is our way of stating how pointless the whole thread is. Very few posts, funny or serious, are worthy of reading more than once.
This "comedy" isn't what keeps me coming back to MetaFilter.So skip the jokes.
Maybe my annoyance is heightened by the fact that the recipe in question was done in full in the comments, and not placed on the poster's website and linked to or something.
Anyway, here's one vote hoping we don't see more of the same of this kind of thing.
posted by beth at 9:37 AM on October 12, 2003