Comments on: Lots of spelling errors in this post

Lots of spelling errors in this post

knave — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:06:29 -0800

Can you count the number of spelling errors in this post? I see five in the first sentence! Can we put a little effort into our posts?

By: Robot Johnny

Robot Johnny — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:30:39 -0800

Y'know I usually think spelling error call-outs are petty, but wow -- that's just awful.

By: Plutor

Plutor — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:32:22 -0800

aslo, use morre capitolisation!

By: knave

knave — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:36:23 -0800

Also, some punctuation would help, but that's a slightly more advanced request.

By: jessamyn

jessamyn — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:39:23 -0800

I cleaned up the spelling just to spare everyone's eyes but here's the original for comparison. Is it possible this guy doesn't speak English very well?

rainwater harvesting As nosted on metaefficeinet Arron up in the northeast has his own home based business producing rain harvesing barrells It seems like an idea we all should consider doing. A rain barrel is a rainwater harvesting system that is connected to a down spout tube from a house or building. We make quality rain barrels that collect, store and divert rooftop runoff during a rain shower.

By: MLIS

MLIS — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:41:23 -0800

No need to be a jerks about it - I think halekon will get the message based on the call-out. Also, right now the "link" "bold" and "italics" commands are not working for me. Maybe "Spell Check" is not working for halekon - maybe he is not a native English speaker.

By: casu marzu

casu marzu — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:41:52 -0800

I least know what language this post is written in. Unlike some. I'm not complaining though. I like being an old fuddy-duddy just fine.

By: docpops

docpops — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:42:20 -0800

Holy crap.

I thought I was loosing mine mind becus the [cleaned up] version looked OK, albeit clumsy. The original is just plain embarrassing.

By: MLIS

MLIS — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:43:19 -0800

Jessamyn I did not see your comment before posting.

By: mr_crash_davis

mr_crash_davis — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:02:20 -0800

halekon's posting history shows a gradual decline in proper punctuation, but few, if any, spelling errors.

I'm not suggesting anything, I just find it interesting.

By: crunchland

crunchland — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:09:27 -0800

the worst part of it is that halekon's alias used to be "halcyon."

By: erisfree

erisfree — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:09:47 -0800

Maybe he was posting it from a PDA of some sort? Tiny little keyboards.

By: docpops

docpops — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:15:25 -0800

someone call his mom

By: naxosaxur

naxosaxur — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:17:50 -0800

Whut teh fack is rong with his poast gawd you guys r sooo nitt piggy

By: quonsar

quonsar — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:18:19 -0800

the "link" "bold" and "italics" commands are not working for me.

<a href="http://link_url">link text</a>

bold text

italic text

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:25:58 -0800

Can you count the number of spelling errors in this post? I see five in the first sentence!

List 'em, then. I only see four. And at least two of those are typos anyway, not spelling errors.

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:27:40 -0800

Nonono, quonsar, you have to do it the Mefi way!

link text

bold text

italic text

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:28:00 -0800

D'oh!!!!

The Mefi way:

link text

bold text

italic text

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:29:08 -0800

Ok, somebody give me some medicine. I know what I'm doing wrong, but I seem to keep...on...DOING IT.

Third time = charm.

<a href="http://link_url*>link text</a>

bold text

italic text

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:32:09 -0800

List 'em, then. I only see four. And at least two of those are typos anyway, not spelling errors.

I'm not going to try to guess on which are "real" spelling mistakes and which are typos, but here you go:

As nosted on metaefficeinet Arron up in the northeast has his own home based business producing rain harvesing barrells It seems like an idea we all should consider doing.

And for extra pedanticism, I think it should be "home-based", not "home based", but that's neither here nor there.

By: goatdog

goatdog — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:33:04 -0800

I hate "em" and "strong" instead of "i" and "b".

And at least two of those are typos anyway, not spelling errors.
A typo being something that, in the post, introduced... spelling errors, right? Sheesh.

By: Plutor

Plutor — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:33:10 -0800

soyjoy:
1. nosted (noted)
2. metaefficeinet (metaefficient)
3. Arron (Aaron)
4. harvesing (harvesting)
5. barrells (barrels)

Maybe it's a code. Take all the extra/missing/misplaced letters (s, e, i, a, r, t, l) and it spells out a code! "I resalt"! "Sal tire"!

By: squidlarkin

squidlarkin — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:35:45 -0800

the worst part of it is that halekon's alias used to be "halcyon."

Ha, were you stuck behind that guy at an Orbital show too?

By: PinkStainlessTail

PinkStainlessTail — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:46:26 -0800

nitt piggy

This needs to become a meme, along the lines of "intarweb" and "hawt". NOW.

By: iconomy

iconomy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:53:47 -0800

the worst part of it is that halekon's alias used to be "halcyon."

[this is good]

By: naxosaxur

naxosaxur — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:58:27 -0800

PST, it's all yours...run with it!

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:23:46 -0800

OK, I missed harvesing. The point being that most of these are typos rather than misspellings. Why would such a ridiculously petty distinction matter? Because knave's is a ridiculously petty callout.

Plutor, how about "Lit ears"?

By: Bugbread

Bugbread — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:31:06 -0800

I dunno, a 16% misspelling rate is pretty bad, especially when teamed with bad punctuation. I mean, sure, it isn't the kind of magnum opus callout that will win an academy award, but typoing/misspelling 16% of your words on a post that goes on the front page is pretty bad too.

By: knave

knave — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:39:46 -0800

Damn, I guess I'll have to work on my MetaTalk performance if I'm to win any awards...

By: knave

knave — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:45:29 -0800

Plutor, you had me laughing. How about eTrails (good name for a website?) or it's real (keep it real, yo).

By: casu marzu

casu marzu — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:47:29 -0800

nitt piggy

This needs to become a meme, along the lines of "intarweb" and "hawt". NOW.

I have no words.

By: scarabic

scarabic — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:48:51 -0800

I cleaned up the spelling just to spare everyone's eyes

Thank you jessamyn.

halekon - it should never have to come to that.

By: soyjoy

soyjoy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:01:19 -0800

it's real - of course! *smacks forehead*

All right, you win this one, knave.

By: Kirth Gerson

Kirth Gerson — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:49:47 -0800

soyjoy, could you enlighten me as to the difference between "typos" and "spelling errors"? You seem to see a clear distinction, which I am missing.

By: PinkStainlessTail

PinkStainlessTail — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:47:48 -0800

Typos are the result of typing errors, not necessarily an inability to spell correctly. It's not always easy to tell them apart, but if I type "slaes" when the word I'm trying for in "sales", it's a typo. Similarly, if I type "padantic" when I mean "pedantic", it's probably a spelling error.

By: PinkStainlessTail

PinkStainlessTail — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:48:37 -0800

Or like above when I typed "in", instead of "is".

By: Smart Dalek

Smart Dalek — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:05:56 -0800

nitt piggy iz kurmutt's gurlfrand
BTW LSO
DISGREE
W RSFREZ
PDA/SMS
THRY B CUZ
S PRBY JST
HSTY TYP
4 NTRIN
PSTZ

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:34:59 -0800

I can see we are all going to have to get nitt piggy on you, PinkStainlessTail.

And now a short play entitled "King Lear Takes a Nap"

Earl of Nonsense jumps up from chair: Tis Lear!
King Lear: Sit, Earl.
Earl of Nonsense: Ta, Sire. L-
King Lear (interrupts): I'l a rest.
Lear falls asleep and the Earl tiptoes off.

By: iconomy

iconomy — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:02:27 -0800

So knave, can you tell everyone in the AskMe pony threads that check mark is two words, while you're at it?

By: sophie

sophie — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:42:01 -0800

I cleaned up the spelling just to spare everyone's eyes.

Thanks, I'm glad to hear it - mostly because I was really confused clicking on the link in this Metatalk post and trying to find the spelling errors. (I spent a few minutes there before reading this thread and was losing my mind!)

By: Mean Mr. Bucket

Mean Mr. Bucket — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:56:36 -0800

Metafilter: Tiny little keyboards

By: santiagogo

santiagogo — Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:14:54 -0800

I've realized that every post that's pissed me off in terms of grammar, spelling, and punctuation comes from this person.

By: andrew cooke

andrew cooke — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:23:35 -0800

i could only see one mistake at first and never found all of them (before giving up and looking at other comments). why are some people much more sensitive to this than others? or, to phrase it in a less provocative way, why do i not notice these? i can think of several reasons:

i'm less smart than other people
i'm not at school/college any more, so beaing aware of this isn't (pervasively) important
i almost always write on computers so, if it's important, i can spell check (and if it's not, i don't care)
i read too quickly
the idea that you criticise someone for spelling mistakes seems childish to me - perhaps because it was only at school that it seemed important? - so i guess i have less incentive to do so

it's fairly common for programmers and related computer people to have a rather literal turn of mind. if you say something ambiguous, for example, it's "funny" to misinterpret that in the way not intended by the speaker. i put "funny" in scare quotes because i don't find it amusing at all. is this related?

i guess what i'm really asking is, why bother? i'm trying very hard to believe this isn't just childish one-upmanship, people that read so slowly they spell out each word and have real problems with this text, school kids who still think they won't get a gold star if they make a typo, or people who think actively misunderstanding others in this way is amusing.

(i didn't bother to spell check this - it seemed hypocritical; i pray for your tolerance....)

By: languagehat

languagehat — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:24:21 -0800

i guess what i'm really asking is, why bother?

It makes them feel superior. People like to feel superior.

By: semmi

semmi — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:59:32 -0800

People like to feel superior.

People?

Bagoly mondja verebnek: Nagyfeju!

By: kindall

kindall — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:12:38 -0800

i guess what i'm really asking is, why bother?

I have learned to stop criticizing spelling mistakes, but they are still awful. When you hit a spelling mistake, you have to stop reading (a mostly automatic activity that leaves your conscious mind free to concentrate on the meaning being conveyed) and figure out what the writer meant. It's like hitting a brick wall. Your speed drops to about 10% and you are "thrown out" of the reading trance. Now, once in a while is not that annoying, in fact it's almost inevitable and you'll likely cause it yourself in your own writing so there's no point in berating anyone for it, but when it happens repeatedly, every paragraph, every sentence, every other word, you begin to get the impression that the writer does not give one whit about his readers, and i consider this extremely rude.

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:28:52 -0800

Languagehat, I don't know about that. I'm not so hot myself in the spelling department (I never can get my -ences and my -ances straight) but I think striving for some semblance of professionalism on the front page is a worthy cause. No one here is demanding 100% perfection (gawd help them if they are) merely asking for a little bit of effort. In this case there were a lot of typos. Even if halekon cannot spell, (and could not use spell check for some reason) he could at least make the effort to read over the post before hitting the submit button.

Is it so wrong to ask for a minimum level of standard spelling and usage?

Here is what happens when a post is filled with errors. I'm reading phrases, skimming along, and bam! My brain stops reading for meaning and focuses on trying to identify "What is wrong with this phrase?" Sometimes it takes a moment. I have to go back and forth a bit to work it out. Too many problems and the page looks ugly to me. Too many spelling errors and I decided it just isn't worth the effort.

By: Secret Life of Gravy

Secret Life of Gravy — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:31:47 -0800

Hah. I didn't catch that "decided" in the last sentence!

By: languagehat

languagehat — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:51:57 -0800

I think striving for some semblance of professionalism on the front page is a worthy cause.

Oh, so do I, but that's not what I was talking about. The question I was answering was specifically "why bother [calling out other people's spelling mistakes]?" and I believe my answer is generally accurate, though of course no human behavior can be reduced to a single variable. I myself (being an editor) notice every single one of the mistakes that so annoy people, and if there are enough of them they can annoy me too (though my mind is boggled by kindall's "When you hit a spelling mistake, you have to stop reading... and figure out what the writer meant" -- I guess some people have a very different experience of reading than I do), but I would never dream of pointing at someone else and saying "Hey, everybody, look -- that person can't spell!" I think it's deplorable, no better than pointing at someone and saying "Hey, look at that fattie!" Just my opinion. (But I warn all and sundry, I am very good at finding typos/misspellings anywhere if I look hard enough -- I've found them in reference books, Oxford Classical Texts, &c -- and if you get too high and mighty about other people's failings in this matter, I might go looking for yours and nail them to the wall. I won't be pointing at your mistake but at your false assumption of superiority.)

By: kindall

kindall — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:24:55 -0800

kindall's "When you hit a spelling mistake, you have to stop reading... and figure out what the writer meant" -- I guess some people have a very different experience of reading than I do

What is your reading experience like? I'm curious.

By: languagehat

languagehat — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:47:13 -0800

Well, I read along, and if I encounter a spelling error or other extraneous problem, the "editorial" part of my brain automatically notes it while the rest of me goes on reading with no break. Only if the error is so egregious or hilarious that I have to share it with someone do I actually stop reading. Multitasking, you could say. I guess I automatically "translate" the error as I read, so that I don't have to consciously figure anything out. But obviously people have very different reading mechanisms; I have a friend who doesn't notice even the most glaring errors, so he translates them even more automatically. It's an interesting subject; I presume studies have been done, and someday I'll have to look them up.

By: joaquim

joaquim — Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:05:08 -0800

halekon has posted 10 links and 15 comments to MetaFilter. Member since: November 18, 2004

I wonder how many people have a link/comment ratio this high. You know -- people who are working to bring the community links, rather than just reacting to posts. I know I don't. (joaquim has posted 9 links and 262 comments to MetaFilter and no threads and 12 comments to MetaTalk. Member since: May 17, 2001)

Let's check some of the people who are complaining about the spelling errors:

Secret Life of Gravy has posted 14 links and 874 comments to MetaFilter. Member since: August 3, 2002

kindall has posted 10 links and 4770 comments to MetaFilter. Member since: September 30, 2000
(OK, kindall was complaining about spelling errors in general and not halekon in particular.)

santiagogo has posted 2 links and 18 comments to MetaFilter. Member since: November 18, 2004

knave has posted no links 45 comments to MetaFilter and 1 thread and 14 comments to MetaTalk. Member since: November 18, 2004

bugbread has posted no links 415 comments to MetaFilter and 2 threads and 305 comments to MetaTalk. Member since: November 18, 2004

So halekon hurt your eyes and slowed your reading down and offended your sense of professionalism. (How does professionalism enter into this? Are we getting paid to post?) Do we really want to drive away someone who is bringing us content -- especially over spelling errors?