February 25, 2005

5:57 AM

As a sop to us nit-picking philosophers, could the Religion & Philosopy category be renamed "Religion & Philosophy"? Sorry, I know painquale already mentioned this in a comment in another thread, but that was months ago.
posted by bricoleur to bugs at 5:57 AM (15 comments total)

so you can't imagine a possible world in which people who nitpick about details are called philosopers?
posted by andrew cooke at 6:29 AM on February 25, 2005

or possibly pysicists.
posted by taz at 6:59 AM on February 25, 2005

well, it would be "pysicsts" wouldn't it?
posted by andrew cooke at 7:17 AM on February 25, 2005

Damn. Did I take the wrong portal again?
posted by bricoleur at 7:35 AM on February 25, 2005

pucking pedantic pilosopers
posted by papercake at 7:43 AM on February 25, 2005

well, it would be "pysicsts" wouldn't it?

Now you're just being psilly.
posted by taz at 7:46 AM on February 25, 2005

Pstop being pstupid, you.
posted by jonmc at 7:50 AM on February 25, 2005

Why would anyone pair philosopy with religion in the first place?
posted by mischief at 8:01 AM on February 25, 2005

argh - sorry, taz, misread your post (duh!) (and copied your spelling thinking it was right) (god i'm stuid)
posted by andrew cooke at 8:12 AM on February 25, 2005

Phamous philosopers psuch as Phlato
posted by dodgygeezer at 8:12 AM on February 25, 2005

phixed.
posted by mathowie at 8:27 AM on February 25, 2005

does the flatonic method involve eating beans?
posted by andrew cooke at 8:38 AM on February 25, 2005

Enough of your soppistry!
posted by Capn at 8:57 AM on February 25, 2005

phixed.
posted by mathowie at 8:27 AM PST on February 25 [!]


Well, i guess thats the phinal word.
posted by googly at 9:02 AM on February 25, 2005

or, as the Phrench would say... phin
posted by papercake at 9:08 AM on February 25, 2005