<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Why is there a %40 where the @ should be?</title>
      <link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be/</link>
      <description>Comments on MetaTalk post Why is there a %40 where the @ should be?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:20:29 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:20:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Why is there a %40 where the @ should be?</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be</link>	
  	<description>FidelDonson&apos;s Profile&lt;br&gt;
Name: Fidel Donson&lt;br&gt;
Email: donson%40mail.dk&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am wondering why the @ shows up as a %40 in the user profiles</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:17:11 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>FidelDonson</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jpoulos</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be#9374</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s to prevent bots from picking up your email address and sending you spam.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919-9374</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:20:29 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jpoulos</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mathowie</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be#9381</link>	
  	<description>I run some spam bot diverting mechanisms, so if anyone uses a bot to scrape emails, they should be turned away. But if they don&apos;t get turned away, there&apos;s no email addresses with an @ symbol in them. Try the link, it should still work for you.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919-9381</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: fooljay</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be#9521</link>	
  	<description>Matt, dontcha think that parlor tricks like these are well known by the spammers?  It&apos;s their &quot;business&quot; to know these things.  You know?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919-9521</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:42:44 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: skallas</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be#9646</link>	
  	<description>Small suggestion:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ideally you would want to add a random word to the address.  Something like this:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Address is spam protected, please remove RANDOM_WORD&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Email:  user@RANDOM_WORD.mail.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
or&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Email:  userRANDOM_WORD@mail.com&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
etc.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919-9646</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Lionfire</title>
  	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/919/Why-is-there-a-40-where-the-should-be#11505</link>	
  	<description>user@RANDOM_WORD.mail.com is definitely not a good idea.  Most of the spam robots are smart enough to realise that host.domain.com doesn&apos;t exist.  In fact, from what I&apos;ve been told, most of the software will actually try domain.com in this case.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
While I don&apos;t really care (my procmail scripts take care of 90% of the spam I get), my favourite email cloaking technique is just to replace the @ with something else.  Perhaps a small png/gif that looks like an @, so that no real users are confused, but spam robots won&apos;t see it as an email address.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
While that means you can&apos;t have a mailto: link, and you can&apos;t fully cut&apos;n&apos;paste the email address, it seems to be the most fool(robot) proof technique.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.919-11505</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:15:41 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Lionfire</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>