Comments on: Keep it here, kids

Keep it here, kids

jenleigh — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:41:29 -0800

If you have ominous suspicions about someone's motive for posting, it's preferable you send an email or start a MetaTalk thread rather than starting an off-site thread unbeknownst to the poster.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:51:55 -0800

probably posted there because meta was down.

By: puke & cry

puke & cry — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:53:12 -0800

still a bad idea tho, i guess.

By: mischief

mischief — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:55:16 -0800

If you think that's something, drop into #mefi sometime, jenleigh.

By: I EAT TAPES

I EAT TAPES — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:37:58 -0800

"probably posted there because meta was down"

No! Say it isn't so!

By: Doohickie

Doohickie — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:42:55 -0800

#mefi opened my eyes.....

AAAA++++ would chat again!

By: Feisty

Feisty — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:00:50 -0800

Seemed like he was soliciting opinions from those who would likely know what he was talking about. Wasn't a call to arms or anything. He expressed a notion.

By: Kwantsar

Kwantsar — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:33:13 -0800

Lame, utterly unsurprising, and a little bit cheap.

By: cedar

cedar — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:46:21 -0800

Why is a thread on another site being called out here?

Isn't this something that should be addressed on MetaChat where it was posted in the first place? I don't participate on MetaChat and don't care what is posted there -- if I did, care that is, I would read the site.

In related news... some guy on #mefi was mean to me... can someone do something about it please?

By: y2karl

y2karl — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:51:30 -0800

Oops! Helen Lovejoy tagline, that is...

*Nelson Muntz impression at own error*

By: mischief

mischief — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:56:36 -0800

"Isn't this something that should be addressed on MetaChat where it was posted in the first place?"

Because the callout on Metachat concerned a post on Mefi.
It's all very incestuous, you know. ;-P

By: y2karl

y2karl — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:00:22 -0800

Oops Oops, 9622 comment made to wrong thread ! My bad.

On review: It's all very incestuous, you know. ;-P

Well, that explains the albinism and extra toes, then...

By: dg

dg — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:37:35 -0800

some guy on #mefi was mean to me... can someone do something about it please?
That's not a bug, it's a feature.

By: cedar

cedar — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:46:48 -0800

I should clarify what I said about #mefi. It was hyperbole and a bad hypothetical (read as: entirely made up). Though limited, my interactions with the denizens of #mefi have been overwhelmingly positive.

By: MLIS

MLIS — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:00:34 -0800

cedar: too late, you broke the rule, you spoke about the place that should not be spoken about, now just shut up and accept the inevitable beat-down.

By: interrobang

interrobang — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:03:40 -0800

Gosh, I guess that everyone should be told when they're being talked about.

Apologies to everyone here, my girlfriend, and everyone I work with.

By: y2karl

y2karl — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:37:06 -0800

Let's see--metafilter to metachat to metatalk and then back to... metachat
--that crosses over from incest into some kind of Wilbur Whateley territory.

Ouroboros 9622, this is air traffic control...

By: amberglow

amberglow — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:39:12 -0800

rather than starting an off-site thread ???

By: Carbolic

Carbolic — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:00:32 -0800

But did anyone notice that Thomas and Rehnquist are "pro-pot"

By: loquacious

loquacious — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:05:10 -0800

NERD FIGHT! NERD FIGHT!

By: mathowie

mathowie — Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:06:46 -0800

meh, keep offsite problems offsite please. seems like a lame thing happened and a followup is on the site so I'm closing this.