<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with bias</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/bias</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'bias' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:25:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:25:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>metaask</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/16349/metaask</link>
		<description>I asked &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/93708/Direct-fights-to-London-for-1400&quot;&gt;a question&lt;/a&gt; and many of the responses were that I am &quot;biased.&quot;  Is a judgement of character a prerequisite for answering a question?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.16349</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:25:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>chatfilter</category>
		<category>deleted</category>
		<category>judgement</category>
		<dc:creator>plexi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US-centric MeFi bias</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11206/UScentric%2DMeFi%2Dbias</link>
		<description>&lt;small&gt;I just know I&apos;m going to get beaten up for this comment, but&lt;/small&gt; a lot of FPPs seem to assume that the audience is entirely American, or at least North American. The level of unthinking parochialism seems to have increased recently (or maybe it&apos;s just me). The Guidelines are silent as far as I can tell on whether MeFi has a particular cultural focus or bias, is there or should there be a policy on this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11206</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:59:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>guidelines</category>
		<dc:creator>wilful</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did not, did too, did not, did too (selective quoting)</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/10131/Did%2Dnot%2Ddid%2Dtoo%2Ddid%2Dnot%2Ddid%2Dtoo%2Dselective%2Dquoting</link>
		<description>Steve_at_Linnwood &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/44931&quot;&gt;selectively quotes a Washington Post story&lt;/a&gt;, is called on it, then denies it. This is a lie.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.10131</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:47:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>quote</category>
		<dc:creator>MrMoonPie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biased reading of article?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/2654/Biased%2Dreading%2Dof%2Darticle</link>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/20454&quot;&gt;READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Some people are letting their politics get away with them.  And it&apos;s not like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user.mefi/11267&quot;&gt;they&apos;re&lt;/a&gt; a newly minted user either.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What&apos;s up with that?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2002:site.2654</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2002 10:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>partisan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>Irontom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


