<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with clones</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/clones</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'clones' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 11:00:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 11:00:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>MetaPop: another meta-clone</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/3248/MetaPop%2Danother%2Dmetaclone</link>
		<description>With all the talk of Meta-Clones and the constant back and forthing of what makes a good FPP - I just ran into this - &lt;a href=&quot;http://meta.popdex.com/&quot;&gt;MetaPop&lt;/a&gt;. Relieves the pressure of deciding what to talk about - just let the &quot;group&quot; do it for you.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2003:site.3248</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 11:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clones</category>
		<category>imitation</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>dhacker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title> This is sorta Devil&apos;s Advocatey</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/3224/This%2Dis%2Dsorta%2DDevils%2DAdvocatey</link>
		<description>This is sorta Devil&apos;s Advocatey, but I&apos;d like to hear a discussion on this. As an example, I&apos;ve noticed today that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/25370&quot;&gt;there&lt;/a&gt; are a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/25364&quot;&gt;couple&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/25361&quot;&gt;music&lt;/a&gt; oriented MeFi posts, which is nothing new, but now that there &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.musicfilter.org/index&quot;&gt;are&lt;/a&gt; a couple &lt;a href=&quot;http://musicfilter.yrex.com&quot;&gt;music-specific&lt;/a&gt; MeFi-like sites out there, would it not be better for people to start getting into the habit of utilizing them? To keep MeFi from remaining as polluted as it is? Or do some feel those &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigbold.com/freefilter&quot;&gt;MeFi Wannabes&lt;/a&gt; should be ignored? I mean, why have multiple MeFis if we&apos;re not taking advantage of their presence? And if a decision is made, will that turn into Topic Policing? Is there a solution that can be found before it becomes a problem?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2003:site.3224</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:23:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clones</category>
		<category>filters</category>
		<dc:creator>ZachsMind</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>an Italian MetaFilter</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/1058/an%2DItalian%2DMetaFilter</link>
		<description>Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evhead.com/archives/2001_10_01_arch.asp#6083197&quot;&gt;evhead&lt;/a&gt; comes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verbamanent.org/&quot;&gt;Verbamanent&lt;/a&gt;, which appears to be an Italian MetaFilter. Of course, I can&apos;t read Italian so I can&apos;t say for sure, but it definitely has the look (if not the #006699).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.1058</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 08:55:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>clones</category>
		<category>italian</category>
		<category>mefi</category>
		<category>verbamanent</category>
		<dc:creator>zempf</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


