<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with comedy</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/comedy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'comedy' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:51:28 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:51:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>At least it&apos;s not another downfall parody</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18265/At%2Dleast%2Dits%2Dnot%2Danother%2Ddownfall%2Dparody</link>
		<description>So Matthias Rascher has posted an FPP regarding &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/85402/Hitler-as-the-object-of-comedy&quot;&gt;Walter Moers cartoons about Hitler&lt;/a&gt;.  Some of the comments in the discussion have already gone meta, so I thought I&apos;d bring that bit to the grey and spare the conversation there. Personally, I thought it was a pretty good FPP through &quot;...(J&apos;suis seul dans mon bonker).&quot;  Then Matthais describes some issues he (and others) have with this sort of thing which makes it feel a bit like Ask MeFi or ChatFilter or some such.

Is it wrong to put up an FPP because you want to see the discussion about it?

Is there a better way to do this? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18265</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:51:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Comedy</category>
		<category>Editorialising</category>
		<category>Hitler</category>
		<dc:creator>Kid Charlemagne</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Filepile Comedy</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/7584/Filepile%2DComedy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.o-ox-ox1.org/metafilter/metafilter.jpg&quot;&gt;The following was posted at Filepile yesterday&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2004:site.7584</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 10:57:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comedy</category>
		<category>filepile</category>
		<category>humorous</category>
		<category>mefi</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<dc:creator>johnnydark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A poignant comment</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/646/A%2Dpoignant%2Dcomment</link>
		<description>There is much poignancy seeping between the posts in Paris&apos; &quot;Mel Brooks comment on Hitler&quot; thread.  And I must say, because of, well, Paris bringing it up.  It may be most important to argue with how one feels emotionally on Mel Brooks&apos; statement, but the sum here is definitely more robust than its parts.  I thought everybody&apos;s posts lent to deepening the discussion and I&apos;ve found the thread, thus far, very moving. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This miniscule, though very public conversation is yet another example of humanity working through issues that somehow hypothetically we all will go through, whether in fact we actually do or not.  Thanks to Paris for bringing it up and sticking to his guns.  And like I said, whether I agree with him or not.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is pure MetaFilter!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2001:site.646</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2001 20:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brooks</category>
		<category>comedy</category>
		<category>holocaust</category>
		<category>mefi</category>
		<category>mel</category>
		<category>melbrooks</category>
		<category>nazi</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


