<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with delimiters</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/delimiters</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'delimiters' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:40:14 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:40:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Tag Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/13083/Tag%2DGuidelines</link>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Tags:&lt;/b&gt; I hate how they have to be crunched into one word. What&apos;s the policy/ettiquette about using underscores? Does it break the database? Or should I avoid them just because they&apos;re not convention, therefore no one will know to search for them?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.13083</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:40:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>delimiters</category>
		<category>formats</category>
		<category>formatting</category>
		<category>formattingtags</category>
		<category>guidelines</category>
		<category>scoreonefortheunderscores</category>
		<category>tagdelimiters</category>
		<category>tagformats</category>
		<category>tagging</category>
		<category>tags</category>
		<category>underscores</category>
		<dc:creator>Eideteker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


