<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with editing</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/editing</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'editing' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:03:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:03:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Comment Editing</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/22085/Comment%2DEditing</link>
		<description>We just added the ability to edit comments for five minutes across all MetaFilter sites. Once you add a comment, you&apos;ll see this note in the comment byline: &apos;Need to fix typos? Edit.&apos; You can click &apos;Edit&apos; to bring up a form where you can fix any typos and resubmit your comment. There&apos;s a timer on the edit page to let you know how much time you have to fix things up.

As always, if you want to fix something past the five minute window&amp;mdash;or if you want to remove your comment completely&amp;mdash;please let us know via the contact form. The five-minute edit window should be used for small changes. We track the changes on our end, and we&apos;ll be keeping an eye on how folks use this feature.

Please let us know about any bugs you run into here. If you can include your browser and OS versions that&apos;ll be a big help. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2012:site.22085</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:03:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comment</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<dc:creator>pb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>tl:dr you special snowflake</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/21988/tldr%2Dyou%2Dspecial%2Dsnowflake</link>
		<description>This is a genuine query not a complaint - does anyone else read a lot of AskMeFi questions, think they could perhaps help, then when they look &apos;over the fold&apos; get put off by the huge bulk of further details? I realise that often these questions are places for people to think &apos;out loud&apos; and work through their problem while they ask for help, esp. in relationship questions. However I am finding more and more that I just can&apos;t get through the verbiage, either because it all feel histrionic, or unwarranted, or (and feel free to judge me) melodramatic to add so much &apos;I&apos;m a special snowflake&apos; detail. Or just genuinely tl:dr.

The reason I ask is because if I am the only one, so be it, no harm done. But if there are a lot of questions not getting the attention they probably could because it ends up being tl:dr, could there perhaps be some more guidance about keeping it short, as in maybe added to &apos;- &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/guidelines.mefi&quot;&gt;Open-ended chatty questions that don&apos;t offer a problem to be solved.&lt;/a&gt;&apos; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2012:site.21988</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:27:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askmefi</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>tldr</category>
		<dc:creator>Megami</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>EditMe</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/21333/EditMe</link>
		<description>Desjardins suggested an edit for your answer to &quot;How do I properly bury the body?&quot; Quora has this neat feature where other readers can suggest an edit to your comments. Whether you implement the edit or not is up to you, the original writer of the comment. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bnomadic/6600179327/&quot;&gt;Here&apos;s an example&lt;/a&gt;, with the supposed error marked in red and the suggested change in green.

Could such a feature be added to the entire MetaFilter site at some point? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2011:site.21333</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:38:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>edit</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>quora</category>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Blatcher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I would ride this pony all over town.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/20786/I%2Dwould%2Dride%2Dthis%2Dpony%2Dall%2Dover%2Dtown</link>
		<description>Whatever happened to introducing a three-minute edit window for comments? We&apos;ve talked about this in the past and it seemed like it was at the brink of adoption- It would be a pretty useful feature. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2011:site.20786</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carrots</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<category>freshhay</category>
		<category>noserubs</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<dc:creator>dunkadunc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What say ye of the edit window?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/20283/What%2Dsay%2Dye%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dedit%2Dwindow</link>
		<description>What, dear friends, of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18926/Status-of-Editing-Window-Feature&quot;&gt;edit window&lt;/a&gt;? This is something we&apos;ve discussed in MetaTalk a few times over the past couple of years. We&apos;ve also tried it out at least once in a thread dedicated to the purpose. Has there been any evolution in the mod perspective on this pretty pony, or has he been put out to pasture permanently? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2011:site.20283</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:41:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>edit</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<category>feature</category>
		<category>featurerequest</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>ponyrequest</category>
		<category>window</category>
		<dc:creator>killdevil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Yankees still suck</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18513/The%2DYankees%2Dstill%2Dsuck</link>
		<description>I realize we have sort of a policy of not editing posts, but is there any chance an update could be added to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/87113/and-there-are-no-citizen-initiatives-in-NY-to-overturn-it&quot;&gt;NY Marriage Equality&lt;/a&gt; post? Because honestly, I felt pretty good reading the first 200-or-so comments and the letdown really sucked.  

Also, I sounded like a moron when I proclaimed victory to a friend only to find out many comments later that I was completely wrong. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18513</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:50:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corrections</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>post</category>
		<category>posts</category>
		<dc:creator>graventy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Don&apos;t Have Three Minutes to Change My Mind, Do I?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18267/I%2DDont%2DHave%2DThree%2DMinutes%2Dto%2DChange%2DMy%2DMind%2DDo%2DI</link>
		<description>Whatever happened to the &quot;Timed Editing&quot; feature allowing corrections on comments/posts for 3 minutes after posting (&lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17132/Help-Us-Test-Timed-Editing&quot;&gt;pre-announced and tested here in December 2008&lt;/a&gt;)? Was it officially canceled, filed and forgotten, or implemented but Wendell&apos;s too stupid to figure out how to use it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18267</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:13:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deadpony</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<category>post-posting</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Chrome Bug Returns</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17789/Chrome%2DBug%2DReturns</link>
		<description>Google has once again updated its Chrome browser, and as I seem to remember happening before, the little buttons have disappeared from Metafilter&apos;s edit window, that allow you to easily create bold, italic text or a link.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.17789</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chrome</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<dc:creator>evilcolonel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pony update:  editing after posting</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17257/Pony%2Dupdate%2Dediting%2Dafter%2Dposting</link>
		<description>Is there any update on the &quot;edit your post/comment after posting&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17132/Help-Us-Test-Timed-Editing&quot;&gt;pony&lt;/a&gt;? Hadn&apos;t seen anything since then, unless I missed something. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.17257</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:33:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>posting</category>
		<dc:creator>Chrysostom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Help Us Test Timed Editing</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17132/Help%2DUs%2DTest%2DTimed%2DEditing</link>
		<description>We&apos;re considering a new feature and could use some help kicking the tires. We&apos;re thinking about adding timed editing to the site. So once you post a comment you&apos;d have three minutes to make changes before they&apos;re set in stone. We set up a special thread to test this feature here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/77075/Editing-Window-Test&quot;&gt;Editing Window Test&lt;/a&gt;

The thread has more info about how timed editing works. You need to have JavaScript enabled to see the new edit link next to your comment. Discussing bugs and the feature itself will probably be easier here than in the test thread. Thanks for taking a look! </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.17132</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:56:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comments</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>editwindow</category>
		<category>test</category>
		<dc:creator>pb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Post editing ability</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/16404/Post%2Dediting%2Dability</link>
		<description>Can I haz a pomy^D^Dny?  60 second editing. Hey guys,

It would be super duper if Meta would implement a feature like Digg has where I can post a comment, and then for the next 60 seconds or so (even say 3 minutes) I can edit that post.  I frequently find myself thinking OH YEA! after I post, and adding a short amendment to my original post. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.16404</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:49:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<dc:creator>SirStan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rethinking comment deletion</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15482/Rethinking%2Dcomment%2Ddeletion</link>
		<description>I&apos;m seeing a lot of very eloquent responses to AskMe questions getting deleted.  Some of them are very long, and while they could be thought of as containing &lt;em&gt;some&lt;/em&gt; offending material, the whole comments are being deleted.  I want to propose and discuss just removing the offensive parts -- editing out sentences or paragraphs, and not entire comments, so that the &quot;good stuff&quot; can remain. And maybe there is just too much hacking and slashing.  Looking at an AskMe thread, you can sometimes see remnants of previous comments in what people copy and paste in their own comments, but the originals have been deleted.  And sometimes this can be quite disorienting. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.15482</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:27:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comments</category>
		<category>deletions</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>sexism</category>
		<dc:creator>strangeguitars</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Comment Editing?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15377/Comment%2DEditing</link>
		<description>Comment editing: Is it a pony in the works for some day or will it never ever happen? In the past, I know there has been some discussion about comment editing, and many on the site were opposed to it. Was the idea thoroughly shot down, or is it still a possibility.

One of the concerns seemed to be that people would edit their comments to  completely change their meaning. 

If we did allow comment editing, what if a copy of the original version were saved, and could be viewed by users who are interested in seeing the original unedited version. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.15377</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<dc:creator>drezdn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Making an AskMe anonymous after the fact?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14377/Making%2Dan%2DAskMe%2Danonymous%2Dafter%2Dthe%2Dfact</link>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/64715/My-child-is-driving-me-crazy-Help#973391&quot;&gt;This comment&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/64715/My-child-is-driving-me-crazy-Help&quot;&gt;this AskMe&lt;/a&gt; made me wonder - would it be possible to make an AskMe question anonymous &lt;b&gt;after&lt;/b&gt; it had already been posted?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14377</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anonymity</category>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>kids</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>Zephyrial</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Or just put it on AskMe.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/13840/Or%2Djust%2Dput%2Dit%2Don%2DAskMe</link>
		<description>Can someone &lt;i&gt;please&lt;/i&gt; change the text of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/59376/Who-Watches-the-Watchmen-Apparently-the-people-who-write-Heroes&quot;&gt;this FPP on Heroes&lt;/a&gt; so it doesn&apos;t refer to the name of a well-known comic series with a similarly well-known plot?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.13840</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>heroes</category>
		<category>spoilers</category>
		<category>watchmen</category>
		<dc:creator>spiderwire</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Edit Posting?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/13788/Edit%2DPosting</link>
		<description>Just posted this 

http://ask.metafilter.com/58158/Rats-in-the-car 

And the preview looked fine, but the final posting is one paragraph and hard to read. How can I correct it and did I do something wrong?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.13788</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>paragraphs</category>
		<category>posts</category>
		<dc:creator>zaphod</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Please Edit My Project!</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12615/Please%2DEdit%2DMy%2DProject</link>
		<description>I bought my project (on MeFi Projects) its own domain.  Can I (or Mattamyn) edit the old post to reflect the new domain, or may I repost it? Or should I just live with the redirect?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12615</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:10:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>projects</category>
		<dc:creator>IndigoRain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Could we have a timed window for editing comments?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12088/Could%2Dwe%2Dhave%2Da%2Dtimed%2Dwindow%2Dfor%2Dediting%2Dcomments</link>
		<description>How difficult would it be to program an edit function into our comments that allows us to revise our contributions within 1-5 minutes of posting it? I think it&apos;d be a very cool thing to have for us OCD types that apologize after we spell something wrong and immediately correct ourselves in the next comment. Also, it could serve as a conscience (you post something, you regret it immediately, and get rid of it). Note, I&apos;m not asking for unlimited editing. Only the ability to edit within 1-5 minutes of your original post.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12088</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:35:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comments</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>timed</category>
		<dc:creator>SeizeTheDay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title> Post editor pony request</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12020/Post%2Deditor%2Dpony%2Drequest</link>
		<description>Post editor pony request: a method to shove part of long posts into the first comment, after the post has gone up.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12020</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:21:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>moreinside</category>
		<category>posts</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is new, right? I don&apos;t like it.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11563/This%2Dis%2Dnew%2Dright%2DI%2Ddont%2Dlike%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;small&gt;note: Help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion by focusing comments on the&lt;br&gt;
issues, topics, and facts at hand -- not at other members of the site.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is new, right?  I don&apos;t like it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11563</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>guidelines</category>
		<category>posting</category>
		<dc:creator>rxrfrx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pony: temporary comment editing</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11219/Pony%2Dtemporary%2Dcomment%2Dediting</link>
		<description>Temporary comment editing? &lt;br&gt;I&apos;m sure this has been brought up before but......It would be nice to be able to edit one&apos;s comments for a short period after posting. Not for very long, obviously, but long enough to fix glaring errors or spelling mistakes.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11219</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comment</category>
		<category>comments</category>
		<category>edit</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>feature</category>
		<category>featurerequests</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>requests</category>
		<category>temporary</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Edits bother me</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9840/Edits%2Dbother%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/9838#232772&quot;&gt;Jessamyn&apos;s edit&lt;/a&gt; is really bothering me. There were a few remarks (mine among them) below this, calling attention to it, but Matt closed the thread without addressing this issue. Can we see no more editing for content please? Let posts/comments stand or be deleted, but this middle ground is too slippery a slope.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9840</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:36:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>moderation</category>
		<dc:creator>caitlinb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>My FPP is poorly worded: administrator, please hope?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9524/My%2DFPP%2Dis%2Dpoorly%2Dworded%2Dadministrator%2Dplease%2Dhope</link>
		<description>My bad: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/42031&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; is probably worded a bit awkwardly; should probably be something more like &quot;commerce clause grants congress the exclusive power to regulate interstate commerce&quot; or something like that.  Point being that other bodies (e.g. state legislatures) aren&apos;t allowed.  If clear enough, let it sit.  Thanks.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9524</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 11:30:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awkward</category>
		<category>cleanup</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>fpp</category>
		<dc:creator>rkent</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is there a way to change tags once assigned?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9428/Is%2Dthere%2Da%2Dway%2Dto%2Dchange%2Dtags%2Donce%2Dassigned</link>
		<description>Is there a way to change tags once assigned? In my case, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/17918&quot;&gt;I seem to have misspelled appalachian&lt;/a&gt;, but it occurs to me conversations can shift in-thread that an original poster might want to make note of as well.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9428</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:20:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>features</category>
		<category>tags</category>
		<dc:creator>John Kenneth Fisher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Could this question be edited a bit please?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9288/Could%2Dthis%2Dquestion%2Dbe%2Dedited%2Da%2Dbit%2Dplease</link>
		<description>Impulsive skim-reading foodies could be hurt by cooking with tobacco. Could &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/16777&quot;&gt;this question&lt;/a&gt; be edited a bit please?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9288</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:32:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>danger</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>editing</category>
		<dc:creator>i_am_joe&apos;s_spleen</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


