Malor - your arguments have to stand on their own merits without bringing other people's names up.
[more inside]
posted by Mutant
on Jun 27, 2008 -
74 comments
Come on y'all this is
embarassing. I don't think anyone would appreciate getting their religion bashed this way and Mormon's LOVE that man. Believe me, I know some. Totally uncalled for.
posted by empath
on Jan 28, 2008 -
210 comments
"You know, the thing I really can't stand about queers is they're all Evangelicals like this guy or Republicans like Foley or both. As Amberglow will be the first to tell you, the more you deny it, the more that proves it true."
posted by prostyle
on Nov 3, 2006 -
107 comments
Calling someone a rapist on the sole basis of an accusation made to a reporter is wrong -- and could be libelous. The allegation against
Girls Gone Wild producer Joe Francis is horrible and contains a lot of persuasive details, but that doesn't mean it's true.
posted by rcade
on Aug 5, 2006 -
112 comments
Metafilter:
a generation of irrational, prinitive nincompoops, people who habitually spout indolent, fallacious arsedribble, fucking idiots, dreadful, ignorant, piss-witted religious apologists, fucking pathetic, whining, retrograde imbeciles... Fuck you vermin. Fuck you; you disgrace humanity.
posted by thirteenkiller
on Jul 21, 2006 -
153 comments
Too much of
this discussion is noise and pathetic behavior. It is really difficult to have a discussion when several people seem more interested in directly insulting the poster. Can we get some moderation or is this just a free-for-all? (There is more inside).
posted by dios
on Dec 5, 2005 -
56 comments
Personal Vendetta Filter: dhoyt links to a comment amberglow made yesterday on
Metachat. In doing so, dhoyt continues to insist on taking shots at members on his shit list in threads where they have made no comment whatsoever. This penchant for personal attacks is getting sick. All too often, he uses this place as a sort of personal emotional toxic waste dump where he can vent some jealousy, spite and malice at whoever is on his shit list du jour. This particular time his little chickenshit cheapshot was just a little too obsessive-compulsive over-the-top.
posted by y2karl
on Nov 5, 2005 -
73 comments
This (and the several preceding posts in the thread by this user) are inappropriate and embarrassing, I think.
posted by Jon-o
on Oct 3, 2005 -
6 comments
Okay, so in a lapse of early morning judgement I post a not-so-stellar AskMe post. But does such deserve...(MI)
posted by konolia
on Dec 12, 2004 -
92 comments
We've all seen what can happen when MeFi devolves into pointless personality conflicts: the site gets hijacked to propogate something that 99.9% of the users don't care about. We've also all seen one member virtually drag another into such conflicts, making a two-way crapfest out of what was originally just one-sided goofiness...
[more inside]
posted by Ignatius J. Reilly
on Oct 7, 2003 -
24 comments
This is so lame. I've gotten used to flames on MeFi; its part of what passes for discourse anymore. But
this entire post was a predominace of flaming meta-poo. I understand the calls of Agenda-filter, but if people are going to post stuff like "It seems I must speak in language you understand . Go fuck yourself you ill-bred shit." then I think its time we up the ante. If you're going to Meta-bitch, then take it MetaTalk. More importantly, if you're going to Metaflame, do it with half an ounce of couth and style. That appears to be where MetaFilter is headed, so please keep up. (slightly more inside)
posted by Wulfgar!
on Aug 27, 2003 -
57 comments
Is
this acceptable? I tried to levy what I thought was a reasonable, if salty, criticism against this member for a
previous comment, and I get called some colourful names. I thought the majority of the comments in the thread were a civil and rational blend of discussion, agreement and disagreement, so it made me a bit sad, though not really surprised, to see such a response, and to see it
supported by another member.
posted by sir walsingham
on Feb 12, 2003 -
45 comments
No, dumbass... this isn't a war on weapons of mass destruction... it isn't a war on the fucking "concept" of terrorism, wherever it rears it's ugly metaphorical head... Al Queda is a threat to us. Iraq is a threat to us. Do i have to spell it out for you morons? it's a war on threats to us. motherfucking DUH.
Inexcusable. I could say more, but it would get ugly.
posted by rushmc
on Aug 26, 2002 -
26 comments
Take a trip with me down the Riviera (
#1,
#2,
#3,
#4), where no comment is complete without a little vicious personal invective.
posted by rcade
on Mar 16, 2002 -
141 comments
I think it would be nice if today's Palestine/Israel thread didn't vanish (as per mathowie's recent MeTa post, stating that he is going to delete them all until further notice), at least not before the name-calling starts. The post itself is a bit of a bait, but so far the responses have been well-thought-out, even-handed, and intelligent.
posted by bingo
on Feb 17, 2002 -
1 comment
Can someone tell me if it is standard procedure to receive personal attacks from Metafilter users in my e-mail box because I posted a comment that they didn't like? Wouldn't it be better to post their opinion of my comment in the normal Metafilter thread? Specifically I am referring to a comment I made on
this thread.
posted by dgeiser13
on Sep 18, 2001 -
10 comments
What are the boundaries of acceptable behavior for MetaFilter?
posted by NortonDC
on Aug 29, 2001 -
20 comments
