<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with flagging</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/flagging</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'flagging' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:27:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:27:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>self-flagging</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18557/selfflagging</link>
		<description>Flagging own comments for deletion?  Is there a convention? I made a comment &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/87407/Chicken-Saturday#2860920&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; that, in retrospect, is inaccurate and makes use of the @twit convention. The comment isn&apos;t awful exactly, just not particularly helpful.

 I&apos;m hoping the mods&apos;ll kill it, so I flagged my own comment under &apos;other&apos;.  Do we have any convention for self-flagging? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18557</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:27:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>posts</category>
		<category>selfposts</category>
		<dc:creator>leotrotsky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Page loading&quot; warning prevents flagging</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18367/Page%2Dloading%2Dwarning%2Dprevents%2Dflagging</link>
		<description>I&apos;m getting a Javascript popup saying &quot;The page is still loading, please wait to flag.&quot; while trying to flag &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/136324/Best-Englishlanguage-books-on-improving-ones-social-and-conversational-skills&quot;&gt;this question.&lt;/a&gt; The page is definitely loaded, Firefox shows no activity in the spinner thingy.  Running Firefox 3.0.14 on Ubuntu.

&lt;small&gt;Trying to flag that question because the pile of links smells fishy for a brand new member.&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18367</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:06:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>javascript</category>
		<dc:creator>knave</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>When to flag/not flag?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18365/When%2Dto%2Dflagnot%2Dflag</link>
		<description>Would it be possible to get a better explanation of when to flag/not to flag a comment/post? I sometimes flag things and then think I shouldn&apos;t, or don&apos;t flag things and then think I should. I&apos;m unsure as to what qualifies as a &quot;flaggable&quot; comment or post. I realise that each case will be dealt with individually, but I&apos;m never sure whether I&apos;m doing the right thing in flagging something, or whether I&apos;m wasting people&apos;s time. 

I&apos;ve looked in the FAQ, but I can&apos;t see much in there that explains it. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18365</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<dc:creator>Solomon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Plea for a tagging flag</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18271/Plea%2Dfor%2Da%2Dtagging%2Dflag</link>
		<description>Improving tagging in a poorly tagged post. Do mods ever add tags to a thread when it&apos;s as bare-bones as one like &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/134019/How-should-I-best-handle-bills-when-moving-in-with-my-boyfriend&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;?

I&apos;m always surprised when I see such poor tagging on something- to me this post isn&apos;t about roommates at all, let alone &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; roommates.  

Perhaps there should be a flag for &apos;needs retagging&apos; or something like that.  Seems like the search function could benefit greatly from improvements made to some posts&apos; tags in this manner, and be less likely to get lost in the rubble down the road. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18271</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:00:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>poorlytaggedposts</category>
		<category>tagging</category>
		<category>tags</category>
		<dc:creator>sunshinesky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;d flag and move on but I can&apos;t :(</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/18252/Id%2Dflag%2Dand%2Dmove%2Don%2Dbut%2DI%2Dcant</link>
		<description>Bug report: Flagging in Google Chrome The dropbox for flagging a post appears but does not open up in Google Chrome 4.0.221.4. Clicking anywhere on the dropbox has the same effect as clicking the x to dismiss the box in any other browsers. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.18252</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:17:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bug</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>googlechrome</category>
		<dc:creator>The Devil Tesla</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FIAMO</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17840/FIAMO</link>
		<description>For those who do not want others to discuss the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/82361/Whitepower-gunman-opens-fire-at-Holocaust-Museum&quot;&gt;Holocaust Museum shooting&lt;/a&gt; that occurred today, this Metatalk thread is here for them to address their grievances, away from the original thread.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2009:site.17840</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:07:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>movingon</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Miniature Flag-Waving Pony</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/17094/Miniature%2DFlagWaving%2DPony</link>
		<description>How about letting posters see that their posts have been flagged? I realise that the flagging system as it currently applies is a vehicle for bringing objectionable content to the attention of the moderators, but could it usefully serve as feedback for the poster?

To be more specific, would it be possible (or desirable) for posters to be able to see an anonymised summary of any flags associated with their own posts? My thinking is that this might help reduce the noise created by people both flagging and commenting when they see something objectionable. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.17094</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:44:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>featurerequest</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<dc:creator>le morte de bea arthur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>fantastical</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/16609/fantastical</link>
		<description>Ok.  How many of you mefites used to think &quot;fantastic post/comment&quot; was for use on off-the-wall comments? The first listed entry in most dictionaries for the word is &quot;bizarre; grotesque.&quot;  &quot;Fantastic!&quot; as an interjection always seems positive, but as an adjective it&apos;s not that clear.  Maybe it was only me who made the mistake, but if not, I&apos;d say the word &quot;excellent&quot; is an unambiguous replacement. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.16609</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:32:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fantastic</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>misunderstanding</category>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Premier</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So that interest doesn&apos;t flag...</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15778/So%2Dthat%2Dinterest%2Ddoesnt%2Dflag</link>
		<description>&quot;Chatfilter&quot; is not one of the reasons included in the drop-down flagging menu on ask.me and I think it should be.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.15778</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:17:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>chatfilter</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<dc:creator>zadcat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s not *that* bad, but....</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15277/Its%2Dnot%2Dthat%2Dbad%2Dbut</link>
		<description>Sometimes I want a flag along the lines of &quot;this whole thread needs special attention.&quot;  What should I do when this happens? The most recent example is &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/76378/Bikesex-breaking-the-law&quot;&gt;the bike sex question&lt;/a&gt;.  There&apos;s nothing wrong with the question per se, but people are understandably having a hard time taking it seriously, so there are a lot of responses right now that don&apos;t really answer the question.  I don&apos;t want to flag each and every individual derail, so I just flagged the post itself &quot;other.&quot;  I was also tempted to do this with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/76005/Bisexuality-and-the-law&quot;&gt;question about undisclosed bisexuality&lt;/a&gt; (I don&apos;t remember if I actually did or not), where the combination of barebones question (before the poster came back to clarify) and tags was ruffling a lot of feathers.

So I guess my question is: what would be a helpful thing to do when a post isn&apos;t really against the guidelines, but for whatever reason is prone to trouble? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.15277</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>posts</category>
		<dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>LOLTAGS are not useful</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14944/LOLTAGS%2Dare%2Dnot%2Duseful</link>
		<description>Could we add the ability to flag posts as &quot;these tags are dumb, please would somebody with a brain come and fix them?&quot; I think the backtagging efforts are a marvelous thing that are greatly enhancing the value of Metafilter, so it is disappointing when somebody makes a good post with useless tags. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/55634/&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is one of my favourite examples, but there are many many instances where posters get so carried away with the hilarity of their stunt tags that they forget to include the useful ones. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14944</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>tags</category>
		<dc:creator>nowonmai</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Turn and face the strain</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14651/Turn%2Dand%2Dface%2Dthe%2Dstrain</link>
		<description>There have been a few tweaks to tagging, flagging, and posting. &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14651</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:26:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>features</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>posting</category>
		<category>taggins</category>
		<category>updates</category>
		<dc:creator>pb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Seriously guys, he just wants a name.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14486/Seriously%2Dguys%2Dhe%2Djust%2Dwants%2Da%2Dname</link>
		<description>The poster of &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/66071/Is-there-a-Dr-Phil-in-Manhattan&quot;&gt;this question&lt;/a&gt; has clearly stated, &quot;I&apos;m not trying to solve their problems, I&apos;m looking for specific recommendations for a marriage counselor. You know, like a name.  If I wanted advice about &apos;how do I deal with my friends&apos; psychotic marriage problems,&apos; that&apos;s the question I&apos;d have asked.&quot;  I&apos;ve flagged the responses that judged the poster rather than answering the question, and several of those comments were deleted, but many of them remain.  I&apos;m curious about where that line was drawn.  Also, if people really feel the need to question the poster&apos;s judgment, hopefully they can do it here and leave the thread with less noise.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14486</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:50:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>answers</category>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>callout</category>
		<category>deletions</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>offtopic</category>
		<dc:creator>vytae</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Flag it and move on!&quot; &quot;I can&apos;t!&quot; &quot;The override, where&apos;s the override?!?!?&quot;</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14328/Flag%2Dit%2Dand%2Dmove%2Don%2DI%2Dcant%2DThe%2Doverride%2Dwheres%2Dthe%2Doverride</link>
		<description>Problem A: &lt;a href=&quot;http://jobs.metafilter.com/222/Looking-for-a-good-cell-phone-plan-in-Toronto-Canada&quot;&gt;A Metafilter Jobs post breaks the guidelines, IMO.&lt;/a&gt;
Problem B: I get a Cold Fusion error when flagging it as breaking the guidelines.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14328</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>jobs</category>
		<dc:creator>John Kenneth Fisher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Young and able, but indeflaggable</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14325/Young%2Dand%2Dable%2Dbut%2Dindeflaggable</link>
		<description>Love the new ajax flagging and looking forward to seeing it on the other sites.   I especially like that it shows that you have flagged something, and would like to see an option to remove said flag in case of a mistake, or regretting a knee-jerk reaction.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14325</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:41:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<category>remove</category>
		<category>undo</category>
		<dc:creator>Manjusri</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>new ajaxy flagging in metatalk</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14296/new%2Dajaxy%2Dflagging%2Din%2Dmetatalk</link>
		<description>Flag this post  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14296</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 09:47:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ajax</category>
		<category>features</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Make flags work like favorites please.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14225/Make%2Dflags%2Dwork%2Dlike%2Dfavorites%2Dplease</link>
		<description>Without complaining about a specific thread, Matt, can we get &quot;flagging&quot; to be inline/ajaxy, as a drop down, rather than the press, choose, new page, back to thread? The way that the favorites work?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14225</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 17:54:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ajax</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>inline</category>
		<dc:creator>filmgeek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Quick, someone give this Safety Patrol Officer a gold star!</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12660/Quick%2Dsomeone%2Dgive%2Dthis%2DSafety%2DPatrol%2DOfficer%2Da%2Dgold%2Dstar</link>
		<description>Quick, someone give &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/54685#1430591&quot;&gt;this Safety Patrol Officer&lt;/a&gt; a gold star!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12660</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deleted</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>fpp</category>
		<category>selflink</category>
		<category>shoutout</category>
		<category>smartdalek</category>
		<dc:creator>deadfather</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Moderation discussion</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12560/Moderation%2Ddiscussion</link>
		<description>Leon says: &lt;i&gt;(There&apos;s a serious discussion to be had about how moderation systems tend towards broken as community size increases, but this isn&apos;t the place.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;This&lt;/b&gt; is the place, if my watching MeTa for the last month is any indication.  We have a little bit o&apos; this, in the flagging facility -- and even that is &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/12536&quot;&gt;misunderstood&lt;/a&gt; by many.  And yet people suggest &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/12509&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Discuss?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12560</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:01:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>moderation</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>AskMe Relationship Questions</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12479/AskMe%2DRelationship%2DQuestions</link>
		<description>Is it time for freetherapy.metafilter.com? Nothing against this poster or &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/43974&quot;&gt;their particular situation&lt;/a&gt;, but it&apos;s perhaps the most egregious example I&apos;ve seen of the &quot;I just want someone to talk to&quot; style of non-question that seems to increasingly pollute AskMe.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12479</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:58:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>relationships</category>
		<dc:creator>BackwardsCity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Flag Reasons</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12442/Flag%2DReasons</link>
		<description>this has been mentioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/11975&quot;&gt;before&lt;/a&gt;, but.. i am sometimes hamfisted, and was trying to flag &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/53542&quot;&gt;a post&lt;/a&gt; as fantastic and instead submitted a &quot;pick a reason:&quot; flag.  all of the discussion in the previous thread was about superseding flags - but is it a lot of work to make the site simply reject the pick-a-reasons?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.12442</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:16:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<dc:creator>sergeant sandwich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>29 Is Editorializing AskMe</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11969/29%2DIs%2DEditorializing%2DAskMe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/39062#603441&quot;&gt;I flagged it&lt;/a&gt;, but it appears that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/51325#1296835&quot;&gt;there&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/50984#1282116&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/user/34088&quot;&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/50651#1268326&quot;&gt;of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49784#1234160&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11969</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 15:43:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>askme</category>
		<category>callout</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<dc:creator>aberrant</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Flag This Post&quot; Bug</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11862/Flag%2DThis%2DPost%2DBug</link>
		<description>In MeTa and AskMe the flag [!] icon with each comment has a mouseover that reads &quot;flag this post&quot;. But in MetaFilter the mouseover is really wide with the whole URL as well as &quot;flag this post&quot;. It&apos;s really annoying when scrolling/reading. Can the blue be aligned with the other sites please?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 03:50:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bugs</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<dc:creator>peacay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Announcing: favorites and flagging</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11851/Announcing%2Dfavorites%2Dand%2Dflagging</link>
		<description>I&apos;m working on favorites and releasing what I have today. Think of favorites as an internal bookmark system, a way to keep a list of the good questions, great comments, or interesting ideas you&apos;ve found here.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Right now, you can mark a thread on mefi, metatalk, or ask mefi as a favorite, and view it at the link in the header above (is the header too wide for small monitors?).   All your stuff marked as a favorite is public and anyone else can see the stuff you&apos;ve marked (this comes in handy later on).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ll be adding the ability to flag comments later today and very soon I&apos;ll be doing something akin to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/fantasticposts.mefi&quot;&gt;fantastic posts page&lt;/a&gt; on Ask MeFi, where the most favorited things over the past few days is highlighted on a single page.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11851</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 09:22:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>announcements</category>
		<category>bookmarking</category>
		<category>debuts</category>
		<category>favorites</category>
		<category>featuredebut</category>
		<category>features</category>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>metafilterhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Flag Request</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/11831/New%2DFlag%2DRequest</link>
		<description>Pony request, in light of &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/11830&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt; -- flagging options include &quot;noise&quot;, &quot;derail&quot; or &quot;doesn&apos;t follow the guidlines&quot; but it seems to me AskMe requires another option, kind of an opposite to &quot;fantastic post&quot; -- how about adding &quot;Doesn&apos;t answer the question&quot;? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But that would require AskMe specific flags, which might be difficult or impossible. Instead, how about an &quot;Irrelevant&quot; flag?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.11831</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 14:19:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flagging</category>
		<category>flags</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<dc:creator>Rash</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


