Update on MeFi It Gets Better Project! Deadline approaching: December 1! [more inside]
So we've now watched dozens, possibly hundreds of "It Gets Better" videos from different people and groups. And we've answered questions from all kinds of young queer folks about how to navigate the complexities of life. Isn't it about time that MetaFilter made an "It Gets Better" video? [more inside]
While not disagreeing that it was esentially a stunt, I thought this post
by orthogonality was rather good, with the lack of context, the reaction to the material out of context and discovery of that context being features rather than bugs.
The AskMe thread on blood donation by gay men needs a MeTa outlet. [more inside]
In the recent thread
on the pitfalls of writing realistic LGBT characters, I stated
how I didn't feel the "predatory gay man" trope was completely out of line given how I had encountered such people in real life. Great nastiness ensued. [more inside]
to my previous post
relating to a woman and her children who were denied access to her partner and their mother in a Florida hospital. [more inside]
Incorrect order of events in post about outing a U.S. politician [more inside]
Meet-up in Toronto sometime in late Sept? [more inside]
in an AskMe thread
posted by a gay veteran wanting suggestions for how to convince his military friends of the importance of considering gay issues in the coming election may not break the guidelines, but it's incredibly wrong-headed and I wanted to take issue with it here.
Recently jessamyn rushed to edit the title of an Ask Metafilter
question, changing it from "Nice bag that isn't gay" to simply "Nice bag." Today, on Metafilter
, there is "It's harder than you think to differentiate between what's gay and what's High School Musical."
Why is one offensive, and one is not, if they both reference ideas that are generally accepted as being attractive to gay men?
In a thread from a few weeks ago, someone mentioned an upcoming guest of the RNC would be a man who had a well-documented anti-homosexual agenda. I know, I know. An easy snark: "That's ALL of them! LOLOL" . Any ideas?
getting weary of the bigotry flying
around over the past few days. while conservative viewpoints are entirely necessary to keep conversation here balanced, this repeated stereotyping is beyond juvenile.
Apologies for wasting thread #11111
and other justifications.