<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with itsatrap</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/itsatrap</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'itsatrap' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:06:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:06:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What does it mean to be Akbar&apos;ed?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/10058/What%2Ddoes%2Dit%2Dmean%2Dto%2Dbe%2DAkbared</link>
		<description>Can someone explain the Admiral Akbar pic? I got &quot;Akbar-ed&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/14638#251801&quot;&gt;a while ago&lt;/a&gt;, but dismissed it as an in-joke I&apos;d eventually figure out. Then I saw someone post it on &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/10036#241143&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;. What&apos;s the deal? Is it a dumbass callout? Should I look out for another Akbar-ing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.10058</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:06:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>akbar</category>
		<category>callout</category>
		<category>itsatrap</category>
		<dc:creator>ObscureReferenceMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


