<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with meta and idea</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/meta+idea</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'meta' and 'idea' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:33:27 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:33:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Why MetaFilter is Awesome</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/20729/Why%2DMetaFilter%2Dis%2DAwesome</link>
		<description>Why MetaFilter is Awesome And Why the World Needs to Know Since I joined MetaFilter recently after a month or so of lurking, I&apos;m becoming increasingly &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/27155/is-an-ebay-fraud-seller-free&quot;&gt;amazed&lt;/a&gt; by it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/154334/Help-me-help-my-friend-in-DC&quot;&gt;awesomeness&lt;/a&gt;. I&apos;m greatly uplifted by these examples of the greatness of humankind. I&apos;m grateful. A bit high on endorphines, actually. And I think many other people would like to feel like that too, if they knew how.
I mean, without needles and stuff.

So! Could you kindly please:
a) provide links to more such MetaFilter Awesomeness cos&apos; I&apos;m hooked and I need my fix
b) weigh in on the idea of creating a permanent repository of MetaFilter Awesomeness so that any passerby can appreciate it
c) and/or tell me this has been proposed previously by many a breathless newcomer and point me to the relevant discussion where my idea was crushed ruthlessly by logic and reason long before it was born. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2011:site.20729</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:33:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awesomeness</category>
		<category>best</category>
		<category>callout</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>favorites</category>
		<category>features</category>
		<category>idea</category>
		<category>mefi</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>metafilter</category>
		<category>metafilterhistory</category>
		<category>metafilter-related</category>
		<dc:creator>hat_eater</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A hiatus isn&apos;t a moratorium, but it&apos;d be nice.</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/14670/A%2Dhiatus%2Disnt%2Da%2Dmoratorium%2Dbut%2Ditd%2Dbe%2Dnice</link>
		<description>Suggestion to reduce complaint-filter: a MeTa queue similar to anonymous AskMe. If a complaint can be handled by an admin one-on-one, the admin can deny the requested post and take the conversation to e-mail. If it&apos;s a meetup request or a policy issue that seems worthy of discussion, the admin can approve it and let everyone chime in.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2007:site.14670</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:43:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>idea</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>moderation</category>
		<category>queue</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Recall thread containment</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9168/Recall%2Dthread%2Dcontainment</link>
		<description>Do we need periodic MeTa &quot;What current posts are you looking for but can&apos;t find?&quot; consolidated threads (answering q&apos;s like &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/9164&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/9164#205303&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/9164#205323&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;), lessening these same threads in AskMe? Do we need occasional MeTa posts in which we can all ask about AskMe post resolutions, too, like &lt;strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/4751&quot;&gt;Did she get all the glass out of her underwear?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; Is this a plan? Pros/cons? Does the question of pros/cons of this plan need ITS OWN MeTa post, or is that getting all corporate/committee&lt;strong&gt;/&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointblog.com/past/dilbert.gif&quot;&gt;Dilbert&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;/&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/PETERPR.html&quot;&gt;Peter Principle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;/&lt;/strong&gt;Call in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workingit.com/Work%20articles/What&apos;s%20Your%20Path.htm&quot;&gt;consultants&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt;?&lt;/strong&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9168</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:02:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>idea</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Would MetaFilter be better off without an etiquette/policy section in the gray?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/3634/Would%2DMetaFilter%2Dbe%2Dbetter%2Doff%2Dwithout%2Dan%2Detiquettepolicy%2Dsection%2Din%2Dthe%2Dgray</link>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29300&quot;&gt;Pollo Campero discussion&lt;/a&gt; is a nice example of members drowning out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29300#577306&quot;&gt;derailing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/29300#577307&quot;&gt;attempts&lt;/a&gt; without resorting to MetaTalk (at least until I fucked it up by bringing it here). Would MetaFilter be better off without an etiquette/policy section in the gray?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2003:site.3634</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2003 06:37:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>etiquette</category>
		<category>idea</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


