<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with paysite</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/paysite</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'paysite' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:01:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:01:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Paywall Labelling</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/25576/Paywall%2DLabelling</link>
		<description>I would really like it if all post links that led to sites with a paywall were so marked with an icon or parenthetical like ($) or something. I don&apos;t care so much about comment links but if the link parser was automated then that could be a trivial addition thing. If the catalogue of pay sites was database driven it could be updated in real time. 

In any case, until there&apos;s an automated system, I would really appreciate manual/etiquette related efforts to make it clear which links do and do not go to the open web.  Thanks for your consideration.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2020:site.25576</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:01:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>etiquette</category>
		<category>linkformatting</category>
		<category>paysite</category>
		<category>pony</category>
		<dc:creator>seanmpuckett</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rules for FPPing sites closed to non-members?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9729/Rules%2Dfor%2DFPPing%2Dsites%2Dclosed%2Dto%2Dnonmembers</link>
		<description>What&apos;s the rule/precendent/whatever for FPPing a site that is closed to non-members (and is a pay site) but which may be of interest/use for Mefites? There&apos;s not much to see unless you&apos;re a member and I can&apos;t recall seeing a similar post in the past. Yes? No? Maybe?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9729</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>etiquette</category>
		<category>paysite</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Are links to paysite articles okay?</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/2446/Are%2Dlinks%2Dto%2Dpaysite%2Darticles%2Dokay</link>
		<description>Are links like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/18970&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; akin to saying &quot;Harper&apos;s, page 27&quot;? I did some metatalk searching and all I could find was a post discussing copy-and-pasting of whole pay site articles, it seems like this would have been discussed before, but I guess not.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2002:site.2446</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 14:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>paysite</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<dc:creator>geoff.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


