<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaTalk posts tagged with semantics</title>
	<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/tags/semantics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'semantics' at MetaTalk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:44:28 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:44:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>On Currying Favor...</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/16886/On%2DCurrying%2DFavor</link>
		<description>Semantics, semantics, semantics.  Can we rename &apos;favorites&apos; to &apos;watched&apos; or add a &apos;watched&apos; category? Often I see something that is certainly not my favorite post, but I&apos;d like to watch it - whether its a train-wreck flameout, our friend the re-donkey-lous fedora man, or something about to be Godwinned, there are often threads one doesn&apos;t want to encourage, exactly, or give the impression to the OP that their question/thread was good, exactly... Just that you think its going to make good watching (or in the case of AxeMe, you&apos;ll learn from it).  Isn&apos;t &quot;favoriting&quot; it implying rewarding the person, when you actually just want to &quot;watch&quot; it for the future? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2008:site.16886</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:44:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>favorites</category>
		<category>semantics</category>
		<category>wordsmiths</category>
		<dc:creator>yonation</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Favorites: it took a while to figure if they&apos;re of or by that person</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/13177/Favorites%2Dit%2Dtook%2Da%2Dwhile%2Dto%2Dfigure%2Dif%2Dtheyre%2Dof%2Dor%2Dby%2Dthat%2Dperson</link>
		<description>SemanticsFilter: When you&apos;re viewing the posts and comments that a specific users has marked as a favourite (i.e. the favourites &lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;) it says, for instance, &quot;Favorite posts from blacklite&quot;. It took me a couple of minutes to figure out whether these were the posts &lt;i&gt;by&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt; that person. [mi]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2006:site.13177</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>favorites</category>
		<category>semantics</category>
		<dc:creator>blacklite</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Juan Cole Bites Back</title>
		<link>http://metatalk.metafilter.com/9436/Juan%2DCole%2DBites%2DBack</link>
		<description>&lt;small&gt;Matthew Haughey says he won&apos;t read our blogs if we use the term &quot;mainstream media&quot; (a.k.a. MSM).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A news flash for Matt: We don&apos;t care.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We don&apos;t care if you read our web logs...&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juancole.com/2005/04/mainstream-media-and-bloggers-matthew.html&quot; title=&quot;&apos;We are not the mainstream media, and we are here. Get used to it.&apos; posted by Juan @ 4/26/2005 06:01:00 AM Boy, this guy&apos;s crankier than quonsar...&quot;&gt;Informed Comment&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ouch...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metatalk.metafilter.com,2005:site.9436</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:14:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>juancole</category>
		<category>mainstreammedia</category>
		<category>matthaughey</category>
		<category>matthowie</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>msm</category>
		<category>semantics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


