Posts leading to "premium" sites are not very useful. January 13, 2002 9:11 AM   Subscribe

Posts leading to "premium" sites are not very useful. (more inside)
posted by mr_crash_davis to Bugs at 9:11 AM (10 comments total)

Linking to Salon is OK by me, but if you're going to link, please make sure the entire article is accessible.

I don't think I need to get into the Bush-bashing.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 9:12 AM on January 13, 2002


Sorry about the "bugs" listing. I could have sworn I changed it to "etiquette/policy".
posted by mr_crash_davis at 9:15 AM on January 13, 2002


I don't think I need to get into the Bush-bashing.

Yeah. I found it annoying clicking on an article and only being able to read part of it. I think, as a general rule, premium content should not be the primary link in a FPP.
posted by insomnyuk at 9:18 AM on January 13, 2002


if it is indeed a case of bush telling an outright lie, then surely it would've been reported in another news outlet.
posted by mcsweetie at 10:01 AM on January 13, 2002


Next best thing to a linkless post.
posted by Mack Twain at 10:06 AM on January 13, 2002


New category: premium pancake!
posted by Carol Anne at 10:10 AM on January 13, 2002


*cough*
via NortonDC

Don't ask me, I just work here.


posted by David Dark at 10:11 AM on January 13, 2002


What's with the inflammatory garbage that passes as post descriptions these days?
posted by mathowie (staff) at 11:02 AM on January 13, 2002


i am a horrible monster and i pray for death.

(sorry. been out of the loop for a while. i'll be more vigilante.)
posted by jcterminal at 3:29 PM on January 13, 2002


Mmmmm....pancakes.....
posted by adampsyche at 7:47 AM on January 14, 2002


« Older A felicitous one-off or an example to be followed?...   |   Metatalk training Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments