The Globe and Mail on community blogs

March 2, 2002 4:54 AM

The Globe and Mail on community blogs and blogging as the new intellectual model for the web: "But, in fact, another kind of intellectual-content site has survived, one that makes much fuller use of the Web's unique structure. And the new model is flourishing." It seems that the new model is us.
posted by mcwetboy to general weblog-related at 4:54 AM (9 comments total)

I wonder when the mainstream press is going to discover wikis? they're mentioned here, but almost as if they are a sub-set of weblogs.
posted by rebeccablood at 11:44 AM on March 2, 2002

Cool, thanks for catching this, I would have never seen it otherwise, eh.
posted by mathowie at 11:46 AM on March 2, 2002

There's another version of the story on the Globe site, with 2 more weblog articles and an interesting set of links. (mcwetboy, I'm not stalking you, I swear.)
posted by todd at 1:20 PM on March 2, 2002

(Haven't lived in Waterloo since 1995, Todd. You'll never find me in Ottawa. Never I say!)

Re the other articles: Jiminy, Ingram is writing about blogs now. . . .
posted by mcwetboy at 1:49 PM on March 2, 2002

Another piece on Blogging, this one from the Register, that I think hasn't been mentioned yet. Mostly a response to the response to Dvorak, but not bad.
posted by mattpfeff at 2:01 PM on March 2, 2002

What a bizarre set of "personal weblogs" the Globe chose to link to. Is Ingram on a diet, or what?
posted by D at 2:05 PM on March 2, 2002

SomethingAwful parodies a webblog (well, TV's Wil Wheaton's blog, at least) on their fake front page today as well...
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:10 PM on March 2, 2002

Update : SA parody moved here.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 10:19 PM on March 2, 2002

I dunno if wikis will go mainstream anytime soon... the mental model is probably too confusing for those who aren't super web-savvy. And most wiki interfaces suck.
posted by anildash at 5:55 AM on March 3, 2002