From this week's Harper's magazine email, there is a mention of metafilter May 7, 2002 8:21 AM   Subscribe

From this week's Harper's magazine email, there is a mention of metafilter (more inside).
posted by jonah to MetaFilter-Related at 8:21 AM (4 comments total)

Here is part of the email:

* * * * * * * * *
SOURCES

The Weekly Review is drawn from major news sources such as the New
York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times,
Reuters, the Associated Press, and various news websites. It is not a
weblog, and I'm sorry to say that it would be much too complicated to
post links to particular items (I tend to read newspapers on paper).
If you would like to read more about a story, try searching
the following list of frequent sources. Ananova.com, by the
way, will search other news sites if you click the "Web" option on the
search page. If you can't find a story, email your query to
harpers-weekly@harpers.org.

http://www.ananova.com/search
http://query.nytimes.com/search/advanced
http://www.reuters.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com
http://www.newscientist.com
http://www.sfgate.com/search
http://www.prorev.com
http://www.metafilter.com
http://www.robotwisdom.com
http://www.unisci.com
http://www.latimes.com
http://www.cnn.com


-- -- -- -- -- -- --

I can forward you the whole thing if you want
posted by jonah at 8:22 AM on May 7, 2002


That's impressive, coming from Harper's. It would be difficult to think of a well-written monthly magazine with more integrity. Though I must admit the haphazard nature of the list - specially the ananova link - sort of ruins the effect...
posted by MiguelCardoso at 9:07 AM on May 7, 2002


Does anyone else find the backhanded slap at links (I tend to read newspapers on paper) sort of strange in an email newsletter? It's almost as if the writer can't be bothered to let you know where they got their info except in the most general of manners. Odd.
posted by haqspan at 12:16 PM on May 7, 2002


I don't find it too odd coming from Harpers. To me, alot of their content, particularly the editorial content, comes across very 'holier than thou'. That being said, I do like the feature articles, I was reading the Aral Sea article today at lunch and thoroughly enjoyed it.
posted by jonah at 12:44 PM on May 7, 2002


« Older Us declares itself above the law.   |   commentary-cutting link view pony? Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments