SubscribeAdvertise here: Contact FM.
UpdateFilter: This is actually an update to this prom question. (Please don't delete this. I tried to post in MeTa, but I haven't waited the four necessary days to post there.) So I was working, (at the tanning salon, for those who don't remember) and she comes in. This is where the dialogue starts:
Me: Hey, how's it going today?
Her: Great, you?
[tanning-related stuff here]
Me (after she gets done tanning): Wow, you're really getting dark!
Her: Yeah, I'm really liking it. [sigh] I have to go to work in like 10 minutes.
Me: That sucks, but it's good to have money.
Her: Yeah. I'm going to be spending quite a bit, though.
Me: Me too...Hey, are you going to Metafilter with anyone, by chance?
Her: Meta what?
Me: Er...Prom. Are you going to prom with anyone?
Her: No...
Me: Would you go with me?
Her: Sure!
It is important to recognize that the rules of systematic nomenclature need not necessarily lead to a unique name for each compound, but must always lead to an unambiguous one.... [The] Guide to IUPAC Nomenclature of Organic Compounds often presents alternative sets of rules, equally systematic, wherever available and justifiable, to enable a user to fit the name to a particular need.... Lastly, the Commission recognizes that for certain types of compounds, there is significant disagreement among chemists in different fields as to what should be the preferred nomenclature. This situation leads to an apparent lack of decisiveness in some of the recommendations in this document.That is, one name implies a single compound, but a single compound may have many different equally legitimate chemical names--even under a single organization's rules, and then there are other organizations than IUPAC that have their own sets of rules:
In this Guide, some practices of the Chemical Abstracts Service and/or of the Beilstein Institute have been mentioned. This is done only for informational purposes, and such instances are not necessarily recommendations of the Commission.So for some sets of rules, C_D is probably correct that morphine is a legitimate chemical name.
posted by dobbs at 7:01 PM on May 11, 2005