Metafilter or MetaFilter? August 26, 2006 11:09 AM Subscribe
NitFilter: In the title of the front page ("Metafilter | Community Weblog"), shouldn't Metafilter be Bactrian CamelCase? Or is this one of those sly MetaFilter conventions that only Original Mefites understand?
I had a Bactrian CamelCase once, but the latches were sticky and the handle broke.
posted by hangashore at 11:48 AM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
posted by hangashore at 11:48 AM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
Your peevish need for consistency will be the undoing of us all!
posted by boo_radley at 12:14 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by boo_radley at 12:14 PM on August 26, 2006
Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
Why or why not?
Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Why or why not?
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:41 PM on August 26, 2006 [2 favorites]
Why or why not?
Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Why or why not?
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:41 PM on August 26, 2006 [2 favorites]
"Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
Why or why not?"
Depends on how it's used. If used to modify a noun, yes ("That anal-rentive editor). If used as a stand-alone phrase, no ("That editor is anal retentive"). The why is all about clarity, my friend.
"Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Why or why not?"
Not usually. They're more concerned with your sloppy interrobangs.
posted by klangklangston at 12:45 PM on August 26, 2006
Why or why not?"
Depends on how it's used. If used to modify a noun, yes ("That anal-rentive editor). If used as a stand-alone phrase, no ("That editor is anal retentive"). The why is all about clarity, my friend.
"Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Why or why not?"
Not usually. They're more concerned with your sloppy interrobangs.
posted by klangklangston at 12:45 PM on August 26, 2006
We only have so many capital letters in the world. We can't be capitalizing things willynilly, that is dangerous!
posted by TwelveTwo at 1:03 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by TwelveTwo at 1:03 PM on August 26, 2006
Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
It's only, you know, the name of the site.
Kidding. I like it.
posted by gsteff at 1:12 PM on August 26, 2006
It's only, you know, the name of the site.
Kidding. I like it.
posted by gsteff at 1:12 PM on August 26, 2006
I thought that said
Does anal retentive have a hymen?
I wish I hadn't thought that.
posted by dash_slot- at 1:16 PM on August 26, 2006
Does anal retentive have a hymen?
I wish I hadn't thought that.
posted by dash_slot- at 1:16 PM on August 26, 2006
Depends on how it's used.
Nope, unlike well- and ill- words, anal-retentive always has a hyphen. (See: Merriam-Webster.)
Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Yes, they do. And they pay people like me to tell them.
posted by languagehat at 1:30 PM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
Nope, unlike well- and ill- words, anal-retentive always has a hyphen. (See: Merriam-Webster.)
Don't people wonder if it has a hyphen??!
Yes, they do. And they pay people like me to tell them.
posted by languagehat at 1:30 PM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
I didn't purposely misspell "smoothie". I made the other misteaks on porpoise, though.
posted by Plutor at 1:40 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by Plutor at 1:40 PM on August 26, 2006
languagehat writes 'Depends on how it's used.
'Nope'
I always knew you where a closet prescriptivist.
posted by signal at 2:08 PM on August 26, 2006
'Nope'
I always knew you where a closet prescriptivist.
posted by signal at 2:08 PM on August 26, 2006
Does anal retentive have a hyphen?
I feel you, Matt. I have this coworker who QAs my client work, and sometimes he'll assign me a Jira issue that's something like, "Looks good. Except this one thing looks like it's off by a pixel. Can you fix that?" And I won't even use Jira to respond, because he sits right across for me. I'll be all, "What the hell, dude? Are you kidding me? A pixel? Jesus, why would you even mention that?!" And even though he is totally right, and it'd take me all of a minute to fix it, he'll be like, "It's okay. No big deal. Forget I even mentioned it." And then we'll go downstairs and have a smoke, and everything is fine.
Forget I even mentioned it, Matt.
posted by thinman at 2:09 PM on August 26, 2006
I feel you, Matt. I have this coworker who QAs my client work, and sometimes he'll assign me a Jira issue that's something like, "Looks good. Except this one thing looks like it's off by a pixel. Can you fix that?" And I won't even use Jira to respond, because he sits right across for me. I'll be all, "What the hell, dude? Are you kidding me? A pixel? Jesus, why would you even mention that?!" And even though he is totally right, and it'd take me all of a minute to fix it, he'll be like, "It's okay. No big deal. Forget I even mentioned it." And then we'll go downstairs and have a smoke, and everything is fine.
Forget I even mentioned it, Matt.
posted by thinman at 2:09 PM on August 26, 2006
I vote for Metafilter throughout from here on. CamelCase is, like, so over. Held back the adoption of wikis for years, I tell you.
posted by reklaw at 2:21 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by reklaw at 2:21 PM on August 26, 2006
meta_filter
I've been writing a lot of Ruby lately.
posted by chrismear at 2:54 PM on August 26, 2006
I've been writing a lot of Ruby lately.
posted by chrismear at 2:54 PM on August 26, 2006
Another vote for Metafilter.
posted by joshuaconner at 4:38 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by joshuaconner at 4:38 PM on August 26, 2006
I always knew you where a closet prescriptivist.
They pay me to be a prescriptivist. I bloviate descriptivistically for free.
posted by languagehat at 5:28 PM on August 26, 2006
They pay me to be a prescriptivist. I bloviate descriptivistically for free.
posted by languagehat at 5:28 PM on August 26, 2006
Shouldn't it be anally-retentive, anyway?
posted by UbuRoivas at 5:39 PM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
posted by UbuRoivas at 5:39 PM on August 26, 2006 [1 favorite]
UbuRoivas: No, it's Freudian terminology. It's to do with the "anal stage" in child development.
posted by Kattullus at 7:07 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by Kattullus at 7:07 PM on August 26, 2006
Dammit. I have no excuse here. I actually belong to the smallish proportion of people using the term who not only read, but even formally studied the theory.
posted by UbuRoivas at 7:27 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by UbuRoivas at 7:27 PM on August 26, 2006
Anal-expulsive is a little more Metafilter style. tubgirl notwithstanding.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 8:33 PM on August 26, 2006
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 8:33 PM on August 26, 2006
UbuRoivas writes "Shouldn't it be anally-retentive, anyway?"
Well, if you choose to use the adverbial form of "anal", you certainly should omit the hyphen. Christ.
posted by mr_roboto at 8:38 PM on August 26, 2006
Well, if you choose to use the adverbial form of "anal", you certainly should omit the hyphen. Christ.
posted by mr_roboto at 8:38 PM on August 26, 2006
*high-fives mr_roboto*
posted by languagehat at 5:47 AM on August 27, 2006
posted by languagehat at 5:47 AM on August 27, 2006
Forget the hyphen, hymen, and cAmElcAsE! I'm also very concerned about Mathowie and the Sloppy Interrobangs. I've looked all over and find them.
I'm guessing ska/polka fusion, but I'm afraid they're a Huey Lewis cover band.
posted by ?! at 11:02 AM on August 27, 2006
I'm guessing ska/polka fusion, but I'm afraid they're a Huey Lewis cover band.
posted by ?! at 11:02 AM on August 27, 2006
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by cortex at 11:13 AM on August 26, 2006