GIF/PNG converter? December 1, 2005 9:10 AM Subscribe
There was a post a few months ago about an online text to gif/png converter. I think it was deleted. Does anyone remember the address to that site?
Thanks moift, but I'm looking for that particular site. I think it was deleted because the comments were nothing but images. Ring any bells anyone?
posted by greasy_skillet at 9:56 AM on December 1, 2005
posted by greasy_skillet at 9:56 AM on December 1, 2005
This? moift's is better.
Yes, excellent use of the ticketstub category.
posted by If I Had An Anus at 10:19 AM on December 1, 2005
Yes, excellent use of the ticketstub category.
posted by If I Had An Anus at 10:19 AM on December 1, 2005
Thanks, anus!
posted by greasy_skillet at 10:41 AM on December 1, 2005
posted by greasy_skillet at 10:41 AM on December 1, 2005
I'm very interested in potential usage of a tool like this. Basically, how to keep information a little less public on a public forum.
I understand many of the technical aspects:
One thing that springs to mind... It occurs to me that some quarrelsome folk might decide to interfere with the attempted obfuscation by retyping and posting directly below your comment, or some similar mischief...
Actually, maybe I should post this as an AskMe...
posted by Chuckles at 11:12 AM on December 1, 2005
I understand many of the technical aspects:
- The text isn't searchable with standard tools, and won't be for the foreseeable future.
- The text can be deleted as the user wishes, if they control the host server.
- Anybody who chooses to save a page impression still has this information forever.
- OCR can still break it.
One thing that springs to mind... It occurs to me that some quarrelsome folk might decide to interfere with the attempted obfuscation by retyping and posting directly below your comment, or some similar mischief...
Actually, maybe I should post this as an AskMe...
posted by Chuckles at 11:12 AM on December 1, 2005
Once upon a time, Ticketstubs existed. No more, it looks like.
posted by Plutor at 11:37 AM on December 1, 2005
posted by Plutor at 11:37 AM on December 1, 2005
Oh crap. Hehe. It's funny because it's a picture and not text.
I am usually against the closing of MeTa threads, but not this one.
posted by nthdegx at 11:46 AM on December 1, 2005
I am usually against the closing of MeTa threads, but not this one.
posted by nthdegx at 11:46 AM on December 1, 2005
posted by If I Had An Anus at 11:58 AM on December 1, 2005
What about the practical vs. theoretical security? Just because I have a known/theoretical attack on an obfuscation measure doesn't mean that, in practice, the obfuscation measure confers no general increase in security.
Or to put it another way, you may not be able to fool all of the people all of the time, but if you aren't protecting nuclear secrets you might be satisfied with fooling more of 'em more of the time.
So are we talking about security in the absolute sense ("Can this be broken? Can this be attacked?") or in the practical sense ("How often will this be broken? How much can we afford to have this attacked?")
posted by cortex at 12:22 PM on December 1, 2005
Or to put it another way, you may not be able to fool all of the people all of the time, but if you aren't protecting nuclear secrets you might be satisfied with fooling more of 'em more of the time.
So are we talking about security in the absolute sense ("Can this be broken? Can this be attacked?") or in the practical sense ("How often will this be broken? How much can we afford to have this attacked?")
posted by cortex at 12:22 PM on December 1, 2005
ticketstubs.metafilter.com is where the site is archived.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:22 PM on December 1, 2005
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:22 PM on December 1, 2005
This thread is closed to new comments.
usage
posted by moift at 9:50 AM on December 1, 2005