Can we post commercial sites in Projects? February 28, 2006 5:31 AM Subscribe
projects - is it acceptable to submit blatant commercial projects with less than universal appeal? more inside.
posted by Tryptophan-5ht to etiquette/policy at 5:31 AM (32 comments total)
my girlfriend is breeding these special(overpriced) chameleons. if i build her a website to help sell them, could i post it? posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 5:32 AM on February 28, 2006
Sounds like bad karma to me. posted by yhbc at 5:48 AM on February 28, 2006
How much is an overpriced chameleon? posted by Witty at 5:52 AM on February 28, 2006
Why the hell not. Post away. posted by seanyboy at 5:55 AM on February 28, 2006
That sounds like a pretty exciting commercial project. posted by rxrfrx at 6:03 AM on February 28, 2006
a four month old red bar panther ambilobe can go for $300 give or take $100. that seems a bit much but what do i know? posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 6:03 AM on February 28, 2006
Tryptophan-5htwrites"a four month old red bar panther ambilobe can go for $300 give or take $100. that seems a bit much but what do i know?"
It's early yet, but I can't imagine reading a better couple of sentences on MeFi today. posted by OmieWise at 6:11 AM on February 28, 2006
How would the website customers get them? Is it legal to send lizards in the mail?
Just curious, is all. posted by veedubya at 6:21 AM on February 28, 2006
As long as the website you build is Web 2.0 compliant, you can post it. posted by mikepop at 6:23 AM on February 28, 2006
I think it's fine. I always thought Projects was for blatant self-linking anyway. It seems that maybe Projects needs a 6-month cliff, though, because there've been a few swoop-n-spam $5 n00b incidents recently. posted by scarabic at 6:33 AM on February 28, 2006
Send me $2.49, and I will say, "Yes, they are acceptable." posted by mischief at 6:34 AM on February 28, 2006
veedubya, i wondered that same thing while i tryin to talk a friend in Arizona into mailing me one of those sonoran desert toads. turns out, UPS will ship animals as long as they're not venemous.
So is the actual project the chameleons, the website, or you trying to score points with the lady friend? ;) posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:12 AM on February 28, 2006
As long as the website you build is Web 2.0 compliant, you can post it.
Call it ... Lizrd posted by boo_radley at 7:14 AM on February 28, 2006
I think you need to make the website viewable on mozilla browsers only. posted by crunchland at 7:14 AM on February 28, 2006
Yes, they are acceptable.
mischief, I undersold you by half a dollar. Hahahaha! posted by languagehat at 7:42 AM on February 28, 2006
ha! posted by cortex at 7:42 AM on February 28, 2006
Tryptophan: mozilla logo = lizard posted by matthewr at 7:57 AM on February 28, 2006
Lizrd.com is totally available posted by mikepop at 8:00 AM on February 28, 2006
my girlfriend is breeding these special(overpriced) chameleons.
Am I the only one who read a "with" in there on first glance? Alert the fundies: human-animal hybrids!!!
Err, I mean, sure. Projects is projects. posted by If I Had An Anus at 8:01 AM on February 28, 2006
Lizrd.com is totally available
Dude you could like totally have the first 2.0 lizard commerce site. posted by glenwood at 8:06 AM on February 28, 2006
Human-lizard offspring is exactly what Bush warned about in his State of the Union speech. posted by Astro Zombie at 8:07 AM on February 28, 2006
They'll ship lizards sure, but NO WEEVILS! Got that? posted by loquax at 8:20 AM on February 28, 2006
I think you need to make the website viewable on mozilla browsers only.
once upon a time I developed something on my powerbook, and then posted it to Projects, and then there was a hellstorm on MeTa, but then it was borderline okay and didn't get deleted, and then like a month and a buncha traffic later i realized it didn't even work in IE. only firefox and safari.
crunchland knows what he is talking about - being mozilla-only will save your project! posted by soma lkzx at 8:59 AM on February 28, 2006
red bar panther ambilobe
But for a mere five dollars, I could have an excellently-named sock-puppet... posted by tpl1212 at 9:41 AM on February 28, 2006
Curses! Foiled again. posted by mischief at 10:01 AM on February 28, 2006
Everyone seems cool with it so, so be it. Personally, it seems like a bad idea* to me — but I've never been clear as to what's the point of Projects, anyway. Is it just supposed to be a steam valve of sorts, a dumping ground for any pseudo-commercial ventures that people would otherwise be tempted to post on AskMe?
* Posting to Projects. Not the business itself. I know absolutely jack about chameleons. posted by cribcage at 11:02 AM on February 28, 2006
I probably should add the caveat that I never read Projects. posted by mischief at 11:27 AM on February 28, 2006
does your site use ajax? posted by shmegegge at 12:21 PM on February 28, 2006
I'd recommend ajax when cleaning the cages. posted by Fezboy! at 12:44 PM on February 28, 2006
I generally don't buy food over the internet, thanks. posted by interrobang at 5:40 PM on February 28, 2006
« Older I screwed up. Can you fix it? ... | Cleveland Meetup this Thrusday... Newer »
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 5:32 AM on February 28, 2006