Post about historical debate about numbers? May 31, 2014 8:04 AM Subscribe
I seem to recall a MetaFilter post (or comment in a related post?) that was about the historical debate over several mathematical issues, including a) whether 1 should be considered a number, and b) whether 1 is prime or composite. I searched for it, but can't find it. I recall there being a link to an academic paper about this topic, which is what I really want to find. Does anyone remember this?
[I know that the topic of the primality of .999.... can be a contentious topic. Let's keep it polite.]
[I know that the topic of the primality of .999.... can be a contentious topic. Let's keep it polite.]
And look at that, I was the first commenter on that post. That must be it, but I missed it in the search results. Thanks!
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike at 8:17 AM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike at 8:17 AM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
You navigated the vagaries of the metaqueue for this?
So, time to close this one up then?
I know, I know, not helping.
posted by cjorgensen at 11:21 AM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
So, time to close this one up then?
I know, I know, not helping.
posted by cjorgensen at 11:21 AM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
"What is the smallest prime?" was my post, and so was the .9999...=1 post. What can I say, I like to stir the mathematical shit.
posted by escabeche at 12:20 PM on May 31, 2014 [6 favorites]
posted by escabeche at 12:20 PM on May 31, 2014 [6 favorites]
the mathematical shit
What is known in elementary school as "the remainder".
posted by davidjmcgee at 1:30 PM on May 31, 2014 [4 favorites]
What is known in elementary school as "the remainder".
posted by davidjmcgee at 1:30 PM on May 31, 2014 [4 favorites]
If anybody needs me, I'll be crafting my "What is 0^0?" FPP.
posted by escabeche at 2:03 PM on May 31, 2014 [4 favorites]
posted by escabeche at 2:03 PM on May 31, 2014 [4 favorites]
0^0 = ಠ_ಠ
posted by benito.strauss at 2:13 PM on May 31, 2014 [2 favorites]
posted by benito.strauss at 2:13 PM on May 31, 2014 [2 favorites]
If you're willing to accept a limit, then the limit as X approaches 0 of X^0 is 1.
And if you aren't, then you have to explain how differential calculus has gotten away all this time with division by zero.
posted by Chocolate Pickle at 2:53 PM on May 31, 2014
And if you aren't, then you have to explain how differential calculus has gotten away all this time with division by zero.
posted by Chocolate Pickle at 2:53 PM on May 31, 2014
"including a) whether 1 should be considered a number,"
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike
Deep, very deep.
posted by marienbad at 2:55 PM on May 31, 2014
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike
Deep, very deep.
posted by marienbad at 2:55 PM on May 31, 2014
If you're willing to accept a limit,
Sure, I'm willing to accept a limit. How do you feel about lim x->0 (0x)?
posted by Wolfdog at 5:23 PM on May 31, 2014 [2 favorites]
Sure, I'm willing to accept a limit. How do you feel about lim x->0 (0x)?
posted by Wolfdog at 5:23 PM on May 31, 2014 [2 favorites]
My calculator says that 00 is 1. So that settles it.
I can ask it for the exact value of π, if anyone is interested.
posted by double block and bleed at 9:03 PM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
I can ask it for the exact value of π, if anyone is interested.
posted by double block and bleed at 9:03 PM on May 31, 2014 [1 favorite]
What can I say, I like to stir the mathematical shit.
I scooped you on the 1+2+3+4... = -1/12 post tho
posted by empath at 12:14 AM on June 1, 2014
I scooped you on the 1+2+3+4... = -1/12 post tho
posted by empath at 12:14 AM on June 1, 2014
You navigated the vagaries of the metaqueue for this?
While submitting, I found that the submission form was bugged, so I provided an additional service!
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike at 6:32 AM on June 1, 2014
While submitting, I found that the submission form was bugged, so I provided an additional service!
posted by Philosopher Dirtbike at 6:32 AM on June 1, 2014
Yeah, but most importantly, |∅∅|=1 (where ∅={}), so that settles it. ZFC QED
posted by PMdixon at 12:15 PM on June 1, 2014
posted by PMdixon at 12:15 PM on June 1, 2014
I scooped you on the 1+2+3+4... = -1/12 post tho
Yeah but that's only because I have a whole section about my love for divergent series in my book, and I was actually forbidden by the publisher from writing about that stuff on the Internet in advance.
posted by escabeche at 4:36 PM on June 1, 2014
Yeah but that's only because I have a whole section about my love for divergent series in my book, and I was actually forbidden by the publisher from writing about that stuff on the Internet in advance.
posted by escabeche at 4:36 PM on June 1, 2014
Is anyone else freaked out by the fact that 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 + ... would be the binary "number" ...11111, and has the value -1 (as if the binary "number" were two's complement)? What the fuck?!?!
posted by a snickering nuthatch at 5:13 AM on June 2, 2014
posted by a snickering nuthatch at 5:13 AM on June 2, 2014
To elaborate a bit, p-adic numbers have a prime base, and extend infinitely to the left.
In base 2:
....0000001 = 1, ...0000010=2, etc.
There's no special indication for negative numbers, neither are there decimal spaces.
So how do you get a negative number?
Well, you start with 0 and subtract 1, obviously:
Well, what, if you added 1 to it, would give you an infinite series of 0s?
The answer is an infinite series of 1s:
....11111111111:
It flips the first bit and then carries over to infinity.
Similarly, ...11111110 is -2, etc.
posted by empath at 6:58 AM on June 2, 2014 [1 favorite]
In base 2:
....0000001 = 1, ...0000010=2, etc.
There's no special indication for negative numbers, neither are there decimal spaces.
So how do you get a negative number?
Well, you start with 0 and subtract 1, obviously:
Well, what, if you added 1 to it, would give you an infinite series of 0s?
The answer is an infinite series of 1s:
....11111111111:
It flips the first bit and then carries over to infinity.
Similarly, ...11111110 is -2, etc.
posted by empath at 6:58 AM on June 2, 2014 [1 favorite]
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by dfan at 8:10 AM on May 31, 2014 [2 favorites]