Do we really need more newsfilter posts? January 15, 2003 8:25 AM Subscribe
newsfilter. in the last five minutes i've seen the same info via politech and slashdot. why does it need to be duplicated on mefi too? this is a place for interesting links, not breaking news. faq. wiki.
please, people, if you're interested in this kind of thing, read and post to appropriate sources. posting everything everywhere just makes a big muddy mess where the only distinction between different sites is the member list and moderation system.
please, people, if you're interested in this kind of thing, read and post to appropriate sources. posting everything everywhere just makes a big muddy mess where the only distinction between different sites is the member list and moderation system.
only distinction between different sites is the member list
That's enough of a distinction for me.
posted by vito90 at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
That's enough of a distinction for me.
posted by vito90 at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
Eh. The Supreme Court case is important to people here at MeFi, and it's a continuation of a prior discussion. It affects copyright law, something that MeFi-ers have posted stories about over and over.
I don't see your point, except maybe that you're anal-retentive. If Matt didn't want it on the front page, he'd remove out. Now go away.
posted by SpecialK at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
I don't see your point, except maybe that you're anal-retentive. If Matt didn't want it on the front page, he'd remove out. Now go away.
posted by SpecialK at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
I'm sorry I annoyed you, andrew, but I think this is an interesting link. If you're scanning MeFi, politech, and slashdot, you can certainly skip past the repeats that you're bound to see. If I wanted to read what slashdot or politech people think about the issue, I'd have gone to those sites. I thought that it bore discussion among MeFites.
On preview, thank you, xammerboy. I thought my post was within the spirit of the guidelines, and it's certainly important.
posted by Songdog at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
On preview, thank you, xammerboy. I thought my post was within the spirit of the guidelines, and it's certainly important.
posted by Songdog at 8:35 AM on January 15, 2003
This is a very relevant post to us all, and one that will foster discussion. Unless someone wants to set up an International Subject Allocation Bureau, ensuring each major story appears in only one major website, I'm very happy for MetaFilter to act as a place where I can learn about and discuss all the big relevant issues. I don't go to politech or slashdot, but I'm confident the discussion there is going to be significantly different to the discussion here, and I'm glad that all of them exist.
posted by Pretty_Generic at 8:38 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by Pretty_Generic at 8:38 AM on January 15, 2003
posting everything everywhere just makes a big muddy mess where the only distinction between different sites is the member list and moderation system.
You have a point here, but the problem is in the aggregate not the specific. I've lost track of how many times I've seen the same thing posted absolutely everywhere; sometimes something shows up on MetaFilter weeks after I saw it somewhere else. We're tracking a lot of memes and not exposing as much new material as we should. But pointing out one particular big-news item as a Newsfilter post -- especially since it's a big news item in some circles, and it's bound to get posted in one form or another -- probably doesn't do much to solve that particular problem.
And it actually doesn't have much to do with that problem, either. Big news stories will get posted; the problem with newsfilter is a constant stream of everyday news headlines, or the nth-millionth post on a certain (political) subject from a certain (partisan) point of view.
The point is valid; this just isn't a good example of it.
posted by mcwetboy at 8:39 AM on January 15, 2003
You have a point here, but the problem is in the aggregate not the specific. I've lost track of how many times I've seen the same thing posted absolutely everywhere; sometimes something shows up on MetaFilter weeks after I saw it somewhere else. We're tracking a lot of memes and not exposing as much new material as we should. But pointing out one particular big-news item as a Newsfilter post -- especially since it's a big news item in some circles, and it's bound to get posted in one form or another -- probably doesn't do much to solve that particular problem.
And it actually doesn't have much to do with that problem, either. Big news stories will get posted; the problem with newsfilter is a constant stream of everyday news headlines, or the nth-millionth post on a certain (political) subject from a certain (partisan) point of view.
The point is valid; this just isn't a good example of it.
posted by mcwetboy at 8:39 AM on January 15, 2003
I also agree with andrew's point. MeFi shouldn't simply regurgitate major wire service stories. I just don't think that it does.
posted by Songdog at 8:42 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by Songdog at 8:42 AM on January 15, 2003
quonsar, I actually can't remember writing it. It's the first day of my Slim·Fast diet, you see.
posted by Pretty_Generic at 8:48 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by Pretty_Generic at 8:48 AM on January 15, 2003
Newsfilter would be a fpp about that missing dead pregnant woman, because nobody but the internet community cares (scanning cnn.com/msnbc.com reveals no "BREAKING NEWS: CORPORATE AMERICA BASTARDS RAPE CONSTITUTION"). Also, despite reading up on this story for the last six months on all the hip fight-the-corporate-power websites, I personally nor 99% of people I talk who are not net savvy know what the big deal is about. Maybe if this copyright law was pregnant or missing or something.
("But it is pregnant! Pregnant our hopes of liberty! And Corporate America has kidnapped her!")
posted by Stan Chin at 8:57 AM on January 15, 2003
("But it is pregnant! Pregnant our hopes of liberty! And Corporate America has kidnapped her!")
posted by Stan Chin at 8:57 AM on January 15, 2003
When is someone going to post that Maurice Gibb died?
posted by jonson at 9:03 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by jonson at 9:03 AM on January 15, 2003
in the last five minutes i've seen the same info via politech and slashdot.
And the rest of us should be punished for that why?
posted by rushmc at 9:07 AM on January 15, 2003
And the rest of us should be punished for that why?
posted by rushmc at 9:07 AM on January 15, 2003
I saw the story on BoingBoing and came here specifically to see what MeFi had to say about it. The story is not the point, the commentary is. So put that in your "newsfilter" pipe and smoke it!
posted by rusty at 9:22 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by rusty at 9:22 AM on January 15, 2003
copyright laws. the Internet.
it's not another DC sniper / West Bank crappy news link.
copyright legislation, infringements, P2P etc are typical MeFi topics, and they deserve this kind of coverage. it's a good link, not really NewsFilter
posted by matteo at 9:23 AM on January 15, 2003
it's not another DC sniper / West Bank crappy news link.
copyright legislation, infringements, P2P etc are typical MeFi topics, and they deserve this kind of coverage. it's a good link, not really NewsFilter
posted by matteo at 9:23 AM on January 15, 2003
I don't go to politech or slashdot.
well if you're interested in this kind of news, maybe you should. politech is (also) a mailing list.
in real life (tm) i would suspect that many mefi people prefer shopping in small shops where the owner takes care in selecting interesting products. in contrast, this kind of link is producing a walmart metafilter. just as supermarkets seem to be taking over the world, so mefi is edging more and more towards a general discussion board.
i believe mefi should focus on one thing and be good at it.
and copyright is important. i suspect i consider it more important than most of you, since i actively seek out this kind of info via sources like politech rather than waiting for the "highlights" to pop-up in the condensed, worry-for-one-thread-then-forget-it way that it will be dealt with here. which is another reason why specific forums are a good idea - you get more depth.
oh, and give the "matt will do it, shut up" thing a rest. as ever, this is what meta is for.
posted by andrew cooke at 9:33 AM on January 15, 2003
well if you're interested in this kind of news, maybe you should. politech is (also) a mailing list.
in real life (tm) i would suspect that many mefi people prefer shopping in small shops where the owner takes care in selecting interesting products. in contrast, this kind of link is producing a walmart metafilter. just as supermarkets seem to be taking over the world, so mefi is edging more and more towards a general discussion board.
i believe mefi should focus on one thing and be good at it.
and copyright is important. i suspect i consider it more important than most of you, since i actively seek out this kind of info via sources like politech rather than waiting for the "highlights" to pop-up in the condensed, worry-for-one-thread-then-forget-it way that it will be dealt with here. which is another reason why specific forums are a good idea - you get more depth.
oh, and give the "matt will do it, shut up" thing a rest. as ever, this is what meta is for.
posted by andrew cooke at 9:33 AM on January 15, 2003
"worry-for-one-thread-then-forget-it way that it will be dealt with here"
So........ Wouldn't this make anything non-trivial a bad Metafilter post? (I suspect you don't think so)
posted by y6y6y6 at 9:41 AM on January 15, 2003
So........ Wouldn't this make anything non-trivial a bad Metafilter post? (I suspect you don't think so)
posted by y6y6y6 at 9:41 AM on January 15, 2003
i believe ,
for every drop
of rain
that
falls
a flower grows....................
posted by sgt.serenity at 9:50 AM on January 15, 2003
for every drop
of rain
that
falls
a flower grows....................
posted by sgt.serenity at 9:50 AM on January 15, 2003
y6y6y6 why don't you check out that post a while back that gave greek names for strange debating tactics. see if you can find a description for generalising a particular argument to the point where it's meaningless and then claiming that's what's at stake.
my point is that this is being covered in a million different places - within 5 minutes it's appeared on a pile of different sites. why does mefi have to be yet one more, when it's a place for giving interesting links, not repeating what everyone else is doing?
it's important because it's news, not because it's a great link. if you're interested in this kind of news then read an appropriate site. it's not what mefi's for (imho) and certainly not what mefi's good at. being non-trivial news isn't what makes a good post, it's what makes interesting news. can't you see a pattern here?
hey, sgt serenity, maybe there's also a greek term for derailing a thread because you can't be bothered to frame a decent argument?
posted by andrew cooke at 9:59 AM on January 15, 2003
my point is that this is being covered in a million different places - within 5 minutes it's appeared on a pile of different sites. why does mefi have to be yet one more, when it's a place for giving interesting links, not repeating what everyone else is doing?
it's important because it's news, not because it's a great link. if you're interested in this kind of news then read an appropriate site. it's not what mefi's for (imho) and certainly not what mefi's good at. being non-trivial news isn't what makes a good post, it's what makes interesting news. can't you see a pattern here?
hey, sgt serenity, maybe there's also a greek term for derailing a thread because you can't be bothered to frame a decent argument?
posted by andrew cooke at 9:59 AM on January 15, 2003
metafilter: sam walton would be proud of us.
posted by andrew cooke at 10:02 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by andrew cooke at 10:02 AM on January 15, 2003
This whole argument makes me tired, because it presupposes that MeFi is some kind of semi-official think tank and we have a responsibility to only post links that foster deep analysis and discussion. Bollocks. MeFi is more like a corner coffee shop where you get together with your friends and argue about the issues of the day. When all is said and done, the issues themselves aren't vitally important; if you've had a good conversation, it was a good issue. Who cares if it's been posted everywhere, and been discussed on other boards? This is our board and our conversation, and that's what counts.
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
posted by RylandDotNet at 10:05 AM on January 15, 2003
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
posted by RylandDotNet at 10:05 AM on January 15, 2003
metashoppers, i'd like to call your attention to special savings in aisle 4, Tommy Lee, Pam Anderson resolve custody dispute! meta-mart: always low class, always cheap.
posted by quonsar at 10:18 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by quonsar at 10:18 AM on January 15, 2003
Andrew, give it a rest. The "Newsfilter" battle has been fought a million times before, Matt has said to cut it out (the complaints, not the posts, as long as the latter are OK, which this was), you lost a long time ago. Take a look at the front page.
i believe mefi should focus on one thing and be good at it.
And that one thing is... what Andrew Cooke wants to see on MeFi today?
posted by languagehat at 10:23 AM on January 15, 2003
i believe mefi should focus on one thing and be good at it.
And that one thing is... what Andrew Cooke wants to see on MeFi today?
posted by languagehat at 10:23 AM on January 15, 2003
I'm with Rusty on this. As soon as I saw the news (via Boingboing, too - helps to be alphabetically early, I guess), I knew that there'd be a great discussion about it on MeFi, and for the first time ever I felt like I really joined in and had things to say.
posted by wanderingmind at 11:09 AM on January 15, 2003
posted by wanderingmind at 11:09 AM on January 15, 2003
"my point is that this is being covered in a million different places"
Okay. Fair enough. I'm with you in spirit. This is just the wrong dead horse to beat if you want to advance a serious "less news" argument. IMHO if 49 out of 50 news posts are bad, this would be the one good one.
And I love strange Greek debating tactics, including logic errors. I think everyone knows this. Asking me to adhere to regular rules of argument will only make your panties tighter than they already seem to be. Best to just ignore me.
posted by y6y6y6 at 11:17 AM on January 15, 2003
Okay. Fair enough. I'm with you in spirit. This is just the wrong dead horse to beat if you want to advance a serious "less news" argument. IMHO if 49 out of 50 news posts are bad, this would be the one good one.
And I love strange Greek debating tactics, including logic errors. I think everyone knows this. Asking me to adhere to regular rules of argument will only make your panties tighter than they already seem to be. Best to just ignore me.
posted by y6y6y6 at 11:17 AM on January 15, 2003
in real life (tm) i would suspect that many mefi people prefer shopping in small shops where the owner takes care in selecting interesting products.
Actually, i find these places are overpriced..I'm a cheap college student who prefers the cheap- I can find the interesting products on my own. Alas , I don't exactly have a lot of time to scour the Internet- This is one of the reasons I love MeFi. Woopy-ding that the copyright stuff is posted at other sites (of which I've only heard of /., which I hate). As Rusty so wizely pointed out, I'm not here just for the links, but also for the commentary *and* links that show up in the ensuing comments I can't find on cnn.com
posted by jmd82 at 11:54 AM on January 15, 2003
Actually, i find these places are overpriced..I'm a cheap college student who prefers the cheap- I can find the interesting products on my own. Alas , I don't exactly have a lot of time to scour the Internet- This is one of the reasons I love MeFi. Woopy-ding that the copyright stuff is posted at other sites (of which I've only heard of /., which I hate). As Rusty so wizely pointed out, I'm not here just for the links, but also for the commentary *and* links that show up in the ensuing comments I can't find on cnn.com
posted by jmd82 at 11:54 AM on January 15, 2003
how bizarre! i mention tommy lee and Ty Webb mentions maurice gibb and within minutes they both appear on the front page.
posted by quonsar at 12:18 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by quonsar at 12:18 PM on January 15, 2003
I smell a conspiracy.
posted by crunchland at 12:21 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by crunchland at 12:21 PM on January 15, 2003
Actually, I mentioned maurice gibb. Ty Webb just responded to my comment.
posted by jonson at 1:31 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by jonson at 1:31 PM on January 15, 2003
Well, I think it's dumb to post links to news articles. It might be only my opinion, but I think metafilter should not be linking news articles at all, that's boring, that's not what makes the web different to other media, that it can disseminate news. It should be linking to things that are specifically web-based, new and novel uses for the web (not that there are many, if any nowadays). Anyway, I for one am bored by topical news stories. We need more topics that are unique to the internet. That's why I sought out sites like this in the 1st place.
posted by mokey at 1:37 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by mokey at 1:37 PM on January 15, 2003
How about just not calling it MetaFilter (or NewsFilter) any more, since it's not doing so much of the filtering these days. I vote we call it: Well, I Thought It Was An Interesting Link or maybe DIY Filter, since everybody gets all snippy and says, "If you don't like the link, just skip it", which displays an amazing lack of comprehension of the meaning of the word filter, if you ask me.
Or maybe we could quit bitching and put up interesting, unusual links?
posted by stefanie at 1:54 PM on January 15, 2003
Or maybe we could quit bitching and put up interesting, unusual links?
posted by stefanie at 1:54 PM on January 15, 2003
Now that's a novel approach, stephanie. Maybe you could start the trend yourself?
*sits and waits for stephanie's firstinteresting, unusual link to appear on MeFi*
posted by dg at 2:16 PM on January 15, 2003
*sits and waits for stephanie's first
posted by dg at 2:16 PM on January 15, 2003
Dude, go easy on her. She's only been a member for nineteen months. Plus, the site's been down a lot lately.
posted by jonson at 2:22 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by jonson at 2:22 PM on January 15, 2003
you frame a decent argument and i will attend to it
in the most attetive of manners, you are posting reactively
like most people here with little interest in learning anything new and my singing of frank ifields classic is far more beautiful and elevating than many of your posts put together and pressed down with flowers.
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:47 PM on January 15, 2003
in the most attetive of manners, you are posting reactively
like most people here with little interest in learning anything new and my singing of frank ifields classic is far more beautiful and elevating than many of your posts put together and pressed down with flowers.
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:47 PM on January 15, 2003
and anyone who disagrees is a cunt.
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:48 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:48 PM on January 15, 2003
and obviously, a music hating cunt as well! sing it sarge!
posted by quonsar at 2:53 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by quonsar at 2:53 PM on January 15, 2003
Philistines!
posted by IshmaelGraves at 3:16 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by IshmaelGraves at 3:16 PM on January 15, 2003
Sometimes, when I look up, I see sarcasm's underbelly flying by, and I wonder if I'm getting shorter or if I'm just ducking too soon.
posted by Opus Dark at 3:25 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by Opus Dark at 3:25 PM on January 15, 2003
I think metafilter should not be linking news articles at all
Agreed, though songdog's post was unusual and wasn't the typical news BoreFilter mess. But really, this post could have chosen any of the other kerjillion news posts that bear a striking similarity in sensation to actually buying a newspaper and reading it.
CORPORATE BASTARD CONSTITUTION-RAPISTS!
posted by hama7 at 3:50 PM on January 15, 2003
Agreed, though songdog's post was unusual and wasn't the typical news BoreFilter mess. But really, this post could have chosen any of the other kerjillion news posts that bear a striking similarity in sensation to actually buying a newspaper and reading it.
CORPORATE BASTARD CONSTITUTION-RAPISTS!
posted by hama7 at 3:50 PM on January 15, 2003
it's not what mefi's for (imho)
And there, precisely is what's wrong with your argument. It's your opinion, and the community has just told you it's not valid. Why are you still arguing?
"As for the newsfilter call-outs, something just came to mind: I'm objecting to people doing it because is smacks of so much zero-tolerance bullshit. Again, the reasons why there are no hard and fast rules and only vague guidelines is because nothing is absolute. I'm saying yeah, 30 posts a day is too much, especially if they're all news items, but you know what? half of that is just fine, it's tolerable. Some have taken it as a sign that too many news links means no news links ever, and it's their duty to point this out, and that's what I have a problem with."
--Mathowie
That's what the guy whose opinion matters on the site says. Any questions?
Metafilter has turned into a discussion of posted links site. It's a meta-weblog-filter. Weblogs are posting about this decision, because the community at large thinks it's important. Additionally, it affects the status of content on the Web, which is one of MeFi's other purposes as a community. MeFi is a central place to post, discuss, and debate these issues.
After the last explosion over NewsFilter, when Matt finally blew a gasket or two, there was nothing on the site for two or three days except for cool links. Honestly, it was great. But one thing was missing: discussion. There's not much you can say about a cool link except to say, "Wow, that's cool." Once someone's posted that, everyone just shrugs and moves on to the next link. And besides, that's what personal weblogs are for.
MeFi is a community. As such, it decides as a community what should be posted on the site and what's cool and what's not. Things that are cool at the moment are things that spawn discussions that provide insights. The thread you're calling 'newsfilter' on has spawned a lot of discussion and I've leanred new things by reading it, which means it's a good thread to post.
As matt so nicely said it, "zero-tolerance bullshit" doesn't fly that well around here. So stop flinging zero-tolerance poo all over the place, and we'll all move on and live happy ever after, ungkay?
Hee. Metafilter: Zero Tolerance Poo.
posted by SpecialK at 4:09 PM on January 15, 2003
And there, precisely is what's wrong with your argument. It's your opinion, and the community has just told you it's not valid. Why are you still arguing?
"As for the newsfilter call-outs, something just came to mind: I'm objecting to people doing it because is smacks of so much zero-tolerance bullshit. Again, the reasons why there are no hard and fast rules and only vague guidelines is because nothing is absolute. I'm saying yeah, 30 posts a day is too much, especially if they're all news items, but you know what? half of that is just fine, it's tolerable. Some have taken it as a sign that too many news links means no news links ever, and it's their duty to point this out, and that's what I have a problem with."
--Mathowie
That's what the guy whose opinion matters on the site says. Any questions?
Metafilter has turned into a discussion of posted links site. It's a meta-weblog-filter. Weblogs are posting about this decision, because the community at large thinks it's important. Additionally, it affects the status of content on the Web, which is one of MeFi's other purposes as a community. MeFi is a central place to post, discuss, and debate these issues.
After the last explosion over NewsFilter, when Matt finally blew a gasket or two, there was nothing on the site for two or three days except for cool links. Honestly, it was great. But one thing was missing: discussion. There's not much you can say about a cool link except to say, "Wow, that's cool." Once someone's posted that, everyone just shrugs and moves on to the next link. And besides, that's what personal weblogs are for.
MeFi is a community. As such, it decides as a community what should be posted on the site and what's cool and what's not. Things that are cool at the moment are things that spawn discussions that provide insights. The thread you're calling 'newsfilter' on has spawned a lot of discussion and I've leanred new things by reading it, which means it's a good thread to post.
As matt so nicely said it, "zero-tolerance bullshit" doesn't fly that well around here. So stop flinging zero-tolerance poo all over the place, and we'll all move on and live happy ever after, ungkay?
Hee. Metafilter: Zero Tolerance Poo.
posted by SpecialK at 4:09 PM on January 15, 2003
Now, I totally disagree with andrew cooke on this one, mostly because this specific issue (Eldred etc) is definite Metafilter-fodder.
On the other hand, I strongly disagreed with Mathowie when he semi-ranted about 'zero-tolerance bullshit' when newsfilteritis came to a head a hew months ago, which everyone is so gleefully quoting here in this thread.
One of the principles of Metatalk as I understand it is to provide checks and balances to prevent organically-growing trends (which self-perpetuate, given the dynamic here) from getting out of control. In case I'm being too obtuse here, I mean specifically (for example) the tendency for newsfilteresque posts (a la that freaking sniper and so on) to snowball as more people see them on the front page and assume they're de rigeur, consciously or otherwise.
My point? Although I disagree with Andrew about the thread in question, I'm glad he raised the issue again. It's got nothing to do with this mythical 'zero-tolerance' issue, mathowiequotes notwithstanding. Andrew expressed an opinion, the majority disagreed, we all know where we stand. No loss, other than a few minutes of our time, and MeFi is better for it.
Mission accomplished.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:24 PM on January 15, 2003
On the other hand, I strongly disagreed with Mathowie when he semi-ranted about 'zero-tolerance bullshit' when newsfilteritis came to a head a hew months ago, which everyone is so gleefully quoting here in this thread.
One of the principles of Metatalk as I understand it is to provide checks and balances to prevent organically-growing trends (which self-perpetuate, given the dynamic here) from getting out of control. In case I'm being too obtuse here, I mean specifically (for example) the tendency for newsfilteresque posts (a la that freaking sniper and so on) to snowball as more people see them on the front page and assume they're de rigeur, consciously or otherwise.
My point? Although I disagree with Andrew about the thread in question, I'm glad he raised the issue again. It's got nothing to do with this mythical 'zero-tolerance' issue, mathowiequotes notwithstanding. Andrew expressed an opinion, the majority disagreed, we all know where we stand. No loss, other than a few minutes of our time, and MeFi is better for it.
Mission accomplished.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:24 PM on January 15, 2003
Also, this thread might be better served if someone would call out BGM for being a complete asshole.
Oh wait, I just did it. Namecalling and ad hominy grits : a nasty sandwich, this one.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:33 PM on January 15, 2003
Oh wait, I just did it. Namecalling and ad hominy grits : a nasty sandwich, this one.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:33 PM on January 15, 2003
What SpecialK said.
One of the principles of Metatalk as I understand it is to provide checks and balances to prevent organically-growing trends (which self-perpetuate, given the dynamic here) from getting out of control.
Yes, stavros, but that's not what was happening at the time that Matt made his comment. The subject had been broached, discussed, and people had generally fallen wherever they were going to fall on the opinion graph. Unfortunately, certain people, unhappy that the action they desired was not going to be forthcoming--a blanket ban on any news-related post--were taking it upon themselves to act as vigilantes, trying to preemptively call out and shout down any vaguely new-related post as soon as it was put up. Quite rightly Matt objected to this attempt by a few to rule the whole.
posted by rushmc at 4:40 PM on January 15, 2003
One of the principles of Metatalk as I understand it is to provide checks and balances to prevent organically-growing trends (which self-perpetuate, given the dynamic here) from getting out of control.
Yes, stavros, but that's not what was happening at the time that Matt made his comment. The subject had been broached, discussed, and people had generally fallen wherever they were going to fall on the opinion graph. Unfortunately, certain people, unhappy that the action they desired was not going to be forthcoming--a blanket ban on any news-related post--were taking it upon themselves to act as vigilantes, trying to preemptively call out and shout down any vaguely new-related post as soon as it was put up. Quite rightly Matt objected to this attempt by a few to rule the whole.
posted by rushmc at 4:40 PM on January 15, 2003
Fair enough, rushmc, but that's not what's happening here (an attempt by a few to rule the whole), and thus the comparison is inappropriate, even if the underlying subject matter is the same (ie newsfilteresque posts)....good point, though.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:44 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:44 PM on January 15, 2003
Also (sorry, I keep hitting post too soon), I apologize for calling the 'zero-tolerance' issue 'mythical'. Faulty memory of mine : as rushmc notes, it was a reasonable characterization of what was happening at the time (although I slept through most of it and missed all the fun, being in a goofy timezone).
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:47 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 4:47 PM on January 15, 2003
Also, this thread might be better served if someone would call out BGM for being a complete asshole.
Stav - we're trying, in a meFi way. Give peace a chance.
posted by Wulfgar! at 5:00 PM on January 15, 2003
Stav - we're trying, in a meFi way. Give peace a chance.
posted by Wulfgar! at 5:00 PM on January 15, 2003
Yeah Stav - he's clearly trolling, and I probably shouldn't be feeding him. But, the opinions he's expressing are shared by many in society and even I'm guessing many that read MeFi, so it seemed worthwhile to address them.
The name calling I'm certainly not going to feed by responding to. Anybody can see the guy is just spewing inelegant flame-bait without any of us giving him what he wants by stooping to calling him on it in thread.
posted by willnot at 5:12 PM on January 15, 2003
The name calling I'm certainly not going to feed by responding to. Anybody can see the guy is just spewing inelegant flame-bait without any of us giving him what he wants by stooping to calling him on it in thread.
posted by willnot at 5:12 PM on January 15, 2003
...and I shouldn't have called him an asshole, I know. Pot, kettle. Whoops.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:19 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:19 PM on January 15, 2003
Also, this thread might be better served if someone would call out BGM for being a complete asshole.
I love the expression "the twittering of peabrains"!
And anyway, BGM nailed some darn good points. All in all, a good read.
posted by hama7 at 6:37 PM on January 15, 2003
I love the expression "the twittering of peabrains"!
And anyway, BGM nailed some darn good points. All in all, a good read.
posted by hama7 at 6:37 PM on January 15, 2003
...and I shouldn't have called him an asshole, I know.
Probably not, but a more dead-on description I have never seen. Let's hope he is gone soon, since he can't seem to comment without making personal attacks.
posted by rushmc at 6:46 PM on January 15, 2003
Probably not, but a more dead-on description I have never seen. Let's hope he is gone soon, since he can't seem to comment without making personal attacks.
posted by rushmc at 6:46 PM on January 15, 2003
Bureau of Shooting Yourself In The Foot: AndyC, I would have supported your newsfilter shoutout if you had called it on the dry ice post. ;-P
posted by mischief at 9:49 PM on January 15, 2003
posted by mischief at 9:49 PM on January 15, 2003
...and I shouldn't have called him an asshole, I know. Pot, kettle. Whoops.
I'm going to have to disagree with you 100%. Somebody should and you did. I took a pass because I was arguing with him. Also because his "techniques" suggest a troll even though his posting history suggests those are actually his opinions.
It's be pot:kettle if you were a complete asshole who was intent on contributing nothing meaningful.
posted by yerfatma at 6:21 AM on January 16, 2003
I'm going to have to disagree with you 100%. Somebody should and you did. I took a pass because I was arguing with him. Also because his "techniques" suggest a troll even though his posting history suggests those are actually his opinions.
It's be pot:kettle if you were a complete asshole who was intent on contributing nothing meaningful.
posted by yerfatma at 6:21 AM on January 16, 2003
my singing of frank ifields classic is far more beautiful and elevating than many of your posts put together and pressed down with flowers.
Frank Ifield sang I Believe--maybe in the UK, but over here it was Brook Benton and Dinah Washington that sang I Believe--all we know Ifield for here is I Remember You.
I remember you-hoo
You're the one that
made my dreams come true...
and the fact that he had his hit in '62, which makes him a great pre-Beatles trivia question.
posted by y2karl at 10:32 AM on January 16, 2003
Frank Ifield sang I Believe--maybe in the UK, but over here it was Brook Benton and Dinah Washington that sang I Believe--all we know Ifield for here is I Remember You.
I remember you-hoo
You're the one that
made my dreams come true...
and the fact that he had his hit in '62, which makes him a great pre-Beatles trivia question.
posted by y2karl at 10:32 AM on January 16, 2003
Metafilter: Namecalling and ad hominy grits.
posted by DevilsAdvocate at 10:37 AM on January 16, 2003
posted by DevilsAdvocate at 10:37 AM on January 16, 2003
If we don't post news links, how will we ever increase their ranking at news.google.com? If we don't validate google, we won't have the chance to post links about every single little enhancement it gets.
posted by blue_beetle at 12:18 PM on January 16, 2003
posted by blue_beetle at 12:18 PM on January 16, 2003
but over here it was Brook Benton and Dinah Washington that sang I Believe
Gee, I always listened to the Frankie Laine version!
posted by rushmc at 1:31 PM on January 16, 2003
Gee, I always listened to the Frankie Laine version!
posted by rushmc at 1:31 PM on January 16, 2003
yeah, and Pat Boone sang Tutti-Frutti, too, you'll be saying next...
posted by y2karl at 1:50 PM on January 16, 2003
posted by y2karl at 1:50 PM on January 16, 2003
well guys the central question here is:
does a flower grow for every drop of rain that falls or not?
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:50 PM on January 16, 2003
does a flower grow for every drop of rain that falls or not?
posted by sgt.serenity at 2:50 PM on January 16, 2003
Pat Boone sang Tutti-Frutti, too, you'll be saying next...
Did he? I thought he just did Ozzy Osbourne covers....
posted by rushmc at 7:20 PM on January 16, 2003
Did he? I thought he just did Ozzy Osbourne covers....
posted by rushmc at 7:20 PM on January 16, 2003
Did he? I thought he just did Ozzy Osbourne covers....
They're singing together, on a new song. Not sure when / where it'll be released. When two neighbours join forces, not even God can stop 'em.
posted by Dark Messiah at 9:11 PM on January 16, 2003
They're singing together, on a new song. Not sure when / where it'll be released. When two neighbours join forces, not even God can stop 'em.
posted by Dark Messiah at 9:11 PM on January 16, 2003
This isn't the most erudite post on copyright, but there is a specific MeFi angle on this story - we have a blogger, Lawrence Lessig, whose blogged website expresses a significant opinion, one that doesn't necessarily make broadcast news. The AP wire gives a reader a quick, easy hook to put Mr. Lessig in context. If there were ever an apropos moment to feature Mr. Lessig's web material, this would be it ...
It's easy to complain, gang, but howabout sitting down with a search engine and digging out some stuff that actually adds value to these threads instead? (My user page links to a few search tips.) Collaborative sniffing about almost always has the potential to produce a more interesting range of web material than a single front page post.
We don't all have access to a LEXIS - NEXIS password, you know.
posted by sheauga at 6:02 PM on January 17, 2003
It's easy to complain, gang, but howabout sitting down with a search engine and digging out some stuff that actually adds value to these threads instead? (My user page links to a few search tips.) Collaborative sniffing about almost always has the potential to produce a more interesting range of web material than a single front page post.
We don't all have access to a LEXIS - NEXIS password, you know.
posted by sheauga at 6:02 PM on January 17, 2003
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
"As for the newsfilter call-outs, something just came to mind: I'm objecting to people doing it because is smacks of so much zero-tolerance bullshit. Again, the reasons why there are no hard and fast rules and only vague guidelines is because nothing is absolute. I'm saying yeah, 30 posts a day is too much, especially if they're all news items, but you know what? half of that is just fine, it's tolerable. Some have taken it as a sign that too many news links means no news links ever, and it's their duty to point this out, and that's what I have a problem with."
--Mathowie
I don't go to politech or slashdot.
posted by xammerboy at 8:29 AM on January 15, 2003