That was a rhetorical question, boys November 4, 2007 10:57 PM Subscribe
Have you ever seen anything more in-the-know¿
This post was deleted for the following reason: if your callout is totally ununderstandable, you should probably wait until morning to post it. -- jessamyn
uh, is this a callout? cause, it's pretty weak if it is.
posted by philomathoholic at 11:45 PM on November 4, 2007
posted by philomathoholic at 11:45 PM on November 4, 2007
Well, I'd forgotten about that thread so at least this post -- while not really making much sense to me ... -- pointed me to a new comment that was interesting. And if you check, UH, you'll see that alicesshoe has used '¿' a shit-ton of times in their posting history. ?Is that not cool¿
posted by barnacles at 11:53 PM on November 4, 2007
posted by barnacles at 11:53 PM on November 4, 2007
I'm guessing it's a shout-out for a particularly good comment that saved a mediocre thread from, uh, like, mediocrity or something.
Oh wait, it references #1899896 instead of the good one, #1899891.
furtive's comment taught me something about hockey history and was fun to look at, to boot. You betcha.
posted by BitterOldPunk at 11:58 PM on November 4, 2007
Oh wait, it references #1899896 instead of the good one, #1899891.
furtive's comment taught me something about hockey history and was fun to look at, to boot. You betcha.
posted by BitterOldPunk at 11:58 PM on November 4, 2007
Holy puck.
posted by miss lynnster at 12:27 AM on November 5, 2007
posted by miss lynnster at 12:27 AM on November 5, 2007
.Yes. No. I don't know. Maybe
posted by loquacious at 12:29 AM on November 5, 2007 [2 favorites]
posted by loquacious at 12:29 AM on November 5, 2007 [2 favorites]
It's a harmless affectation just like that girl who wears a raccoon tail attached to her backside all the time.
posted by grouse at 2:34 AM on November 5, 2007
posted by grouse at 2:34 AM on November 5, 2007
¿ǝɹǝɥ ɯǝlqoɹd ɐ s,ǝɹǝɥʇ
posted by hangashore at 4:56 AM on November 5, 2007
posted by hangashore at 4:56 AM on November 5, 2007
It's too goddam easy to post to MetaTalk. There should be a notice that comes up when you try to post that says "Do you really want to do this? Because if you're just farting around, a boxing glove will emerge from the computer and punch your lights out." And people who are too drunk to know what they're posting will believe it and stagger off to puke in the bushes instead.
/has personally puked in the bushes
posted by languagehat at 5:56 AM on November 5, 2007 [4 favorites]
/has personally puked in the bushes
posted by languagehat at 5:56 AM on November 5, 2007 [4 favorites]
I disagree votiperously.
/was hiding in those bushes at the time
posted by stupidsexyFlanders at 6:16 AM on November 5, 2007
/was hiding in those bushes at the time
posted by stupidsexyFlanders at 6:16 AM on November 5, 2007
Votiperously, adverb; uttered in the state of intellectual clarity achieved only when drunk enough not to make a whit of sense.
posted by By The Grace of God at 6:31 AM on November 5, 2007 [4 favorites]
posted by By The Grace of God at 6:31 AM on November 5, 2007 [4 favorites]
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by dersins at 11:10 PM on November 4, 2007