Lexicon: What came after August 9, 2012 9:42 AM Subscribe
Starting a Lexicon game in September, looking for interested players.
Hey folks, I'm getting a MediaWiki platform up and running to host the game and am recruiting players far and wide. (So far that's been my friends, an open call to MeFightClub and an open call to MetaChat.)
Lexicon, for folks not familiar with it, is a written role playing game where you play the part of a scholar who is working with other snarky, opinionated scholars/players to build an encyclopedia about a fictional or fictionalized world. The game follows a simple set of rules that actively encourages every player/character to work on and within the same world. At the end of the game not only do you get, as cortex brilliantly suggested on MeFightClub, a trophy in your head, but you get the experience of having collaboratively built a world with other smart and creative people.
I have experience playing through about half of one game of Lexicon and it was a heck of a lot of fun. It cultivated some really brilliant writing from players who were diversely professional writers, hobbyists, folks who have aspirations to be writers but are professionally not, and folks who were there simply for the game. It was a fantastic experience that I can't wait to be a part of again.
So far I have about 8 interested players and I'm looking for 20. If there's more interest than that, I'm happy to set up a waiting list (or possibly get more GMs involved to support a really big player base). First come, first served.
Framework of the planned game:
- Start September 2012
- Weekly turns
- 1 letter per turn
- Theme: "What came after
- Target article length: 100 - 200 words
Players need to know basic MediaWiki editing, need to know the general Lexicon rules, the house rules and need to be able to keep up with a game coordination discussion list as well as meet game turn deadlines.
You can see the start of the Wiki here. This includes Lexicon rules, Groundrules, general procedures and expectations.
An example of a Lexicon game that went 2 rounds through the alphabet is Ghyll.
If you are interested in joining up, please be aware that I will need to be able to contact you by e-mail but I don't need the e-mail to be identifiable as long as you are responsive. You will also need to be able to participate in an off-wiki discussion group along with the play on the wiki.
Also, please don't let your inability to commit to 6 months of weekly gameplay keep you from signing up. It's not a horrible thing for a game of Lexicon to lose some players and gain some players mid-game. The only hardship really is for the players coming on - they need to do some extra reading/exploring to get up to speed with there the world is at. And really, is that hardship for geeks like us?
Hey folks, I'm getting a MediaWiki platform up and running to host the game and am recruiting players far and wide. (So far that's been my friends, an open call to MeFightClub and an open call to MetaChat.)
Lexicon, for folks not familiar with it, is a written role playing game where you play the part of a scholar who is working with other snarky, opinionated scholars/players to build an encyclopedia about a fictional or fictionalized world. The game follows a simple set of rules that actively encourages every player/character to work on and within the same world. At the end of the game not only do you get, as cortex brilliantly suggested on MeFightClub, a trophy in your head, but you get the experience of having collaboratively built a world with other smart and creative people.
I have experience playing through about half of one game of Lexicon and it was a heck of a lot of fun. It cultivated some really brilliant writing from players who were diversely professional writers, hobbyists, folks who have aspirations to be writers but are professionally not, and folks who were there simply for the game. It was a fantastic experience that I can't wait to be a part of again.
So far I have about 8 interested players and I'm looking for 20. If there's more interest than that, I'm happy to set up a waiting list (or possibly get more GMs involved to support a really big player base). First come, first served.
Framework of the planned game:
- Start September 2012
- Weekly turns
- 1 letter per turn
- Theme: "What came after
- Target article length: 100 - 200 words
Players need to know basic MediaWiki editing, need to know the general Lexicon rules, the house rules and need to be able to keep up with a game coordination discussion list as well as meet game turn deadlines.
You can see the start of the Wiki here. This includes Lexicon rules, Groundrules, general procedures and expectations.
An example of a Lexicon game that went 2 rounds through the alphabet is Ghyll.
If you are interested in joining up, please be aware that I will need to be able to contact you by e-mail but I don't need the e-mail to be identifiable as long as you are responsive. You will also need to be able to participate in an off-wiki discussion group along with the play on the wiki.
Also, please don't let your inability to commit to 6 months of weekly gameplay keep you from signing up. It's not a horrible thing for a game of Lexicon to lose some players and gain some players mid-game. The only hardship really is for the players coming on - they need to do some extra reading/exploring to get up to speed with there the world is at. And really, is that hardship for geeks like us?
This post was deleted for the following reason: Poster's Request -- frimble
Oh yes.
posted by davidjmcgee at 10:21 AM on August 9, 2012
posted by davidjmcgee at 10:21 AM on August 9, 2012
So it's basically Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius?
posted by Eideteker at 10:28 AM on August 9, 2012 [4 favorites]
posted by Eideteker at 10:28 AM on August 9, 2012 [4 favorites]
Sign me up as hard and as fast as possible. My email address is in my profile.
posted by Rock Steady at 10:43 AM on August 9, 2012
posted by Rock Steady at 10:43 AM on August 9, 2012
This sounds like a wonderful game. I'd love to play.
(email on its way...)
posted by metaBugs at 10:45 AM on August 9, 2012
(email on its way...)
posted by metaBugs at 10:45 AM on August 9, 2012
I am so totally in! I've tried twice now to finish a game--the first time the server died and we lost everything and the second time... I guess people just lost interest?
I'll send you my email address. It is lexicon@sixbynine.com.
posted by Squid Voltaire at 11:30 AM on August 9, 2012
I'll send you my email address. It is lexicon@sixbynine.com.
posted by Squid Voltaire at 11:30 AM on August 9, 2012
Oh, man, I want in on this.
posted by adamdschneider at 11:31 AM on August 9, 2012
posted by adamdschneider at 11:31 AM on August 9, 2012
Probably stupid question: Will our email be a primary identifier for the game community? Or will we be able to create our own usernames? Just wondering because I'd prefer to not use my email for open communication because it's my full name.
posted by Think_Long at 12:01 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by Think_Long at 12:01 PM on August 9, 2012
I have an email address in my profile, as well. But I would also prefer it not become publicly visible.
posted by Eideteker at 12:33 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by Eideteker at 12:33 PM on August 9, 2012
Yeah, I'll send you my email.
posted by Think_Long at 1:05 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by Think_Long at 1:05 PM on August 9, 2012
I am signing up.
posted by the man of twists and turns at 1:13 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by the man of twists and turns at 1:13 PM on August 9, 2012
"Eideteker, I already have you down as signed up. Is that correct?"
It is until someone writes me out of existence. =(
posted by Eideteker at 1:14 PM on August 9, 2012
It is until someone writes me out of existence. =(
posted by Eideteker at 1:14 PM on August 9, 2012
I would gladly partake in this tomfoolery. Email in profile.
posted by daniel_charms at 1:47 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by daniel_charms at 1:47 PM on August 9, 2012
Okay, sure.
posted by theodolite at 1:48 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by theodolite at 1:48 PM on August 9, 2012
It is until someone writes me out of existence. =(
posted by _____ at 1:14 PM on August 9 [+] [!]
posted by Think_Long at 2:13 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by _____ at 1:14 PM on August 9 [+] [!]
posted by Think_Long at 2:13 PM on August 9, 2012
Just a clarification of the House Rules for Lexicon, to see if I understand properly:
First turn, first player has a letter, say A, and he writes an A article that links to 2 phantoms. So, he can't write those phantoms. Got that.
Now, if one of the phantoms is a B, that phantom has to be defined before moving on to the Article for letter B, right?
Is that phantom a collaborative effort, or assigned, or does the person who will be doing the B article automatically do the phantom for that article, as well?
That's the only issue that I found confusing.
posted by misha at 2:17 PM on August 9, 2012
First turn, first player has a letter, say A, and he writes an A article that links to 2 phantoms. So, he can't write those phantoms. Got that.
Now, if one of the phantoms is a B, that phantom has to be defined before moving on to the Article for letter B, right?
Is that phantom a collaborative effort, or assigned, or does the person who will be doing the B article automatically do the phantom for that article, as well?
That's the only issue that I found confusing.
posted by misha at 2:17 PM on August 9, 2012
Sounds, [dramitic pause] interesting [Who scream].
If you've got room I'd love to be in on this.
posted by theichibun at 2:42 PM on August 9, 2012
If you've got room I'd love to be in on this.
posted by theichibun at 2:42 PM on August 9, 2012
kalessin: " Also, please don't let your inability to commit to 6 months of weekly gameplay keep you from signing up. It's not a horrible thing for a game of Lexicon to lose some players and gain some players mid-game. The only hardship really is for the players coming on - they need to do some extra reading/exploring to get up to speed with there the world is at. And really, is that hardship for geeks like us? "
I'm going through a lot in real life right now and would not be able to join at the beginning. If things settle down for me in say, October, would it be possible to join mid-stream, as you suggest here?
posted by zarq at 3:37 PM on August 9, 2012
I'm going through a lot in real life right now and would not be able to join at the beginning. If things settle down for me in say, October, would it be possible to join mid-stream, as you suggest here?
posted by zarq at 3:37 PM on August 9, 2012
I don't quite get this:
It's an academic sin to cite yourself. Players never cite their own articles.
Does that mean you can never link to one of your own articles? Or does "cite" mean something else?
posted by eugenen at 4:05 PM on August 9, 2012
It's an academic sin to cite yourself. Players never cite their own articles.
Does that mean you can never link to one of your own articles? Or does "cite" mean something else?
posted by eugenen at 4:05 PM on August 9, 2012
Alert to players: gmail's spam filter caught my mailing list subscription confirmation. If you're waiting for that email, check your spam folders!
posted by BrashTech at 4:31 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by BrashTech at 4:31 PM on August 9, 2012
Looks like we're in waitlist territory already, but I can wait.
posted by Kylio at 4:56 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by Kylio at 4:56 PM on August 9, 2012
Waitlist me! I'm moving in September, but would love to join up in October or so.
posted by snorkmaiden at 5:43 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by snorkmaiden at 5:43 PM on August 9, 2012
Please put me on the waitlist -- email in profile. Didn't want to sign up as a sure thing because I'm not sure I will have time, but I have less compunction about signing up as an alternate.
posted by grobstein at 6:19 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by grobstein at 6:19 PM on August 9, 2012
Yeah, profile email would be best. I'm perfectly fine with using everything as I have it here. I have nothing to hide even though the wife says I really need to install a filter.
posted by theichibun at 6:27 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by theichibun at 6:27 PM on August 9, 2012
I just emailed you.
posted by unknowncommand at 8:29 PM on August 9, 2012
posted by unknowncommand at 8:29 PM on August 9, 2012
Is there any room in something like this for someone who has never played before but finds the idea fascinating?
You will not hurt my itty-bitty feelings if you say "no, we'd rather have experienced players".
posted by DWRoelands at 6:00 AM on August 10, 2012
You will not hurt my itty-bitty feelings if you say "no, we'd rather have experienced players".
posted by DWRoelands at 6:00 AM on August 10, 2012
I'd be in for this. I've never played before either.
I believe my email address is in my profile.
posted by jeather at 7:01 AM on August 10, 2012
I believe my email address is in my profile.
posted by jeather at 7:01 AM on August 10, 2012
I would just love to be waitlisted on this thing, it sounds really neat. Email in my profile works fine.
posted by Doleful Creature at 7:26 AM on August 10, 2012
posted by Doleful Creature at 7:26 AM on August 10, 2012
I'm so up for this. Email already PMed.
posted by Grimp0teuthis at 6:27 PM on August 10, 2012
posted by Grimp0teuthis at 6:27 PM on August 10, 2012
Ooooooh I really want to play. Put me on the waitlist, I guess!
posted by threeants at 11:08 PM on August 10, 2012
posted by threeants at 11:08 PM on August 10, 2012
In one game of Lexicon I played, we started with players distributed over the alphabet, so that, say Player Four began on letter H, Player Five on letter J. It gave a more even population of articles, but I'm not sure that it did anything more than that.
posted by Prince_of_Cups at 9:43 AM on August 13, 2012
posted by Prince_of_Cups at 9:43 AM on August 13, 2012
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by eugenen at 10:18 AM on August 9, 2012