why was my comment deleted March 30, 2006 11:02 AM Subscribe
Can whoever deleted my comment in this thread explain why it was deleted with no explanation and other similar comments remain?
I don't believe so. It was in the top ten replies, I think.
posted by keswick at 11:15 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 11:15 AM on March 30, 2006
because most of your comments are unfunny one-liners or derails, or copy-and-pasted unfunny urban legends?
posted by matteo at 11:15 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by matteo at 11:15 AM on March 30, 2006
Hey! I resemble that remark!
posted by blue_beetle at 11:16 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by blue_beetle at 11:16 AM on March 30, 2006
No, that's why my comments are deleted.
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 11:17 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by It's Raining Florence Henderson at 11:17 AM on March 30, 2006
One of mine isn't there anymore either (no surprise really, I disagreed).
posted by Witty at 11:17 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by Witty at 11:17 AM on March 30, 2006
What's really bothering you, Matteo? You're biting the heads off everyone today. Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for awhile.
posted by crunchland at 11:23 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by crunchland at 11:23 AM on March 30, 2006
keswick, I was going to email you about it. You posted something to the effect of "[flagged][noise] you suck and this post sucks"
It was directed at another member, added nothing, and was noisier than the post it was complaining about.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 11:27 AM on March 30, 2006
It was directed at another member, added nothing, and was noisier than the post it was complaining about.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 11:27 AM on March 30, 2006
I've got no problem with those rules, but how about enforcing them equally?
posted by keswick at 11:28 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 11:28 AM on March 30, 2006
Oh, I almost forgot: matteo, you're a clueless douchebag.
posted by keswick at 11:29 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 11:29 AM on March 30, 2006
Kes, you really think namecalling will get you anywhere with this? Chill and think!!
posted by wheelieman at 11:32 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by wheelieman at 11:32 AM on March 30, 2006
One of mine isn't there anymore either (no surprise really, I disagreed).
Pathetic.
posted by gigawhat? at 11:41 AM on March 30, 2006
Pathetic.
posted by gigawhat? at 11:41 AM on March 30, 2006
"Would you like to hold it?"
posted by loquacious at 11:42 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by loquacious at 11:42 AM on March 30, 2006
It was directed at another member, added nothing, and was noisier than the post it was complaining about.
So when jonmc spits out 34 comments telling MetaFilter how full of themselves they are with Bill Hicks and it's his self-imposed job to knock him off a pedestal that's AOK? Seriously, this fuzzy line of selective administration in conjunction with the comment under the posting box in the blue is really starting to become comical.
posted by prostyle at 11:42 AM on March 30, 2006
So when jonmc spits out 34 comments telling MetaFilter how full of themselves they are with Bill Hicks and it's his self-imposed job to knock him off a pedestal that's AOK? Seriously, this fuzzy line of selective administration in conjunction with the comment under the posting box in the blue is really starting to become comical.
posted by prostyle at 11:42 AM on March 30, 2006
I can confirm that if you write "you suck and this post sucks" it will be deleted; it's happened to me. I still stand by my anti-deletion homies but if there's anything dumber than "you suck and this post sucks" I don't know what it is.
posted by Optimus Chyme at 11:44 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by Optimus Chyme at 11:44 AM on March 30, 2006
Prostyle - What the heck was that?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 11:45 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by Kirth Gerson at 11:45 AM on March 30, 2006
I concur! mathowie has been far too autocratic! WE DEMAND A MEFI VERSION OF THE MAGNA CARTA WITH A CLAUSE STIPULATING AT LEAST 6 PONIES A MONTH BECAUSE HE FUCKING OWES US, DAMMIT!
posted by antifreez_ at 11:49 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by antifreez_ at 11:49 AM on March 30, 2006
Prostyle - What the heck was that?
Look at what mathowie said. If that's the standard of administration around here it needs to be enforced in more places than within the first 20 comments of an obviously heated political thread.
posted by prostyle at 11:50 AM on March 30, 2006
Look at what mathowie said. If that's the standard of administration around here it needs to be enforced in more places than within the first 20 comments of an obviously heated political thread.
posted by prostyle at 11:50 AM on March 30, 2006
Seriously, this fuzzy line of selective administration in conjunction with the comment under the posting box in the blue is really starting to become comical.
This fuzzy line of selective administration is what separates Metafilter from so many shit-stain dictatorships on the web. With light moderation comes a measure of inconsistency that is, in my opinion, much preferable to a shrilly, pedantically enforced set of bylaws.
posted by cortex at 11:51 AM on March 30, 2006
This fuzzy line of selective administration is what separates Metafilter from so many shit-stain dictatorships on the web. With light moderation comes a measure of inconsistency that is, in my opinion, much preferable to a shrilly, pedantically enforced set of bylaws.
posted by cortex at 11:51 AM on March 30, 2006
The phrase is "You suck and your post sucks and I hate you over the internet" and originated here . I meant it as a (semi) tongue-in-cheek remark on how absurd this whole thing is while still conveying they inherent sucktitude of a worthless FPP.
posted by keswick at 11:52 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 11:52 AM on March 30, 2006
I think much of human history can be summed up in the idea that people are willing to take a beating as long as they can be assured that their neighbor will get one too.
Thats what I read in keswick and prostyles statements. Or...what cortex said.
posted by vacapinta at 11:54 AM on March 30, 2006
Thats what I read in keswick and prostyles statements. Or...what cortex said.
posted by vacapinta at 11:54 AM on March 30, 2006
Yeah, take it from me. "Semi tongue-in-cheek" just doesn't convey in straight text messages. (At least, not without an emoticon or two.)
posted by crunchland at 11:55 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by crunchland at 11:55 AM on March 30, 2006
Yesterday was a crummy day for posts in general. I sympathize with keswick.
posted by boo_radley at 11:55 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by boo_radley at 11:55 AM on March 30, 2006
The admins can't keep up with the in-jokes. IDOMFP.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 11:56 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by Armitage Shanks at 11:56 AM on March 30, 2006
vacapinta: It's Haughey's site; I accept he can set the rules as he sees fit. However, in the interest of basic fairness, I do wish he would enforce them equally. That's all. If you want to read something else in my comment, feel free. You'd be wrong though.
posted by keswick at 11:58 AM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 11:58 AM on March 30, 2006
prostyle, by the time I saw those comments by jonmc (which got very few flags despite being, I agree, completely derailing and detrimental) they were firmly entrenched in the thread and couldn't be removed without basically having a do-over. As much as I'd like some threads to have a reset button, there was no way to tease apart jonmc's rants from the people replying to him and the posts that were totally on-topic but also about jonmc in part. I know no good way of dealing with stuff like that, but the flagging queue is the first step and email to the admins or a MeTa thread is the next one.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 12:02 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 12:02 PM on March 30, 2006
Ok, that one stumped me. Could you translate?
There's a link on the period. :)
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:07 PM on March 30, 2006
There's a link on the period. :)
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:07 PM on March 30, 2006
Heh. Ok, I missed the tiny, tiny hyperlink, you clever bastard.
posted by Gamblor at 12:09 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by Gamblor at 12:09 PM on March 30, 2006
Are we talking about a different thread now? There aren't any jonmc comments or Bill Hicks references in the one linked to by the OP.
posted by Kirth Gerson at 12:12 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by Kirth Gerson at 12:12 PM on March 30, 2006
"Can whoever deleted my comment in this thread explain why it was deleted"
Because they hate you.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 12:13 PM on March 30, 2006
Because they hate you.
posted by mr_crash_davis at 12:13 PM on March 30, 2006
Let's be frank: you probably deserve to be hated. I have no specific grievance, just a very strong suspicion.
posted by Ryvar at 12:18 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by Ryvar at 12:18 PM on March 30, 2006
Are we talking about a different thread now? There aren't any jonmc comments or Bill Hicks references in the one linked to by the OP.
Here.
34 comments in one thread between 9:56 AM and 6:47 PM? Good grief.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:19 PM on March 30, 2006
Here.
34 comments in one thread between 9:56 AM and 6:47 PM? Good grief.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:19 PM on March 30, 2006
There's also the touching-yourself-at-night issue.
On a serious note: have you ever noticed that people rarely (if ever) start MeTa threads asking why someone else's comment was deleted? The value of a comment, and the need for it to receive some sort of Justice, really does skyrocket when it's your own, I think.
posted by cortex at 12:20 PM on March 30, 2006
On a serious note: have you ever noticed that people rarely (if ever) start MeTa threads asking why someone else's comment was deleted? The value of a comment, and the need for it to receive some sort of Justice, really does skyrocket when it's your own, I think.
posted by cortex at 12:20 PM on March 30, 2006
ryvar: i'm not disputing that. (yes, it's a slow day at the oriffice.)
posted by keswick at 12:21 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 12:21 PM on March 30, 2006
If that's the standard of administration around here it needs to be enforced in more places than within the first 20 comments of an obviously heated political thread.
They're going to be inconsistent because I can't be everywhere at once. To do this level of consistent perfection you request, I would have to watch every comment fly in, matrix-style to root out each and every lame one. I'd probably need eye drops because I wouldn't have time to blink (comments hit about 1 per second these days).
When I catch lame, empty comments that mock other users (that message is written now in plain text above the posting button), I will remove them. I can't remove each and every instance, but when I see them, I'll ax them. Try not to be too upset when an empty lame comment dies. We're better off for it.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:21 PM on March 30, 2006
They're going to be inconsistent because I can't be everywhere at once. To do this level of consistent perfection you request, I would have to watch every comment fly in, matrix-style to root out each and every lame one. I'd probably need eye drops because I wouldn't have time to blink (comments hit about 1 per second these days).
When I catch lame, empty comments that mock other users (that message is written now in plain text above the posting button), I will remove them. I can't remove each and every instance, but when I see them, I'll ax them. Try not to be too upset when an empty lame comment dies. We're better off for it.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 12:21 PM on March 30, 2006
cortex: well duh. I'm fucking hilarious! Laugh, you dongs!
posted by Ryvar at 12:22 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by Ryvar at 12:22 PM on March 30, 2006
Can I post lame, empty comments that mock other users without specifying their names? What about lame, full comments that mock other users? How about clever, empty comments that mock other users? Are we going to replace the blue with pink? Maybe we can have tea and a teddy bear picnic?
posted by keswick at 12:25 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by keswick at 12:25 PM on March 30, 2006
There's no system for realizing when someone else's comments have been deleted. I think it would be a positive addition. Mine are always perfect anyways--nay, normative baubles of steely perfection.
posted by bardic at 12:30 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by bardic at 12:30 PM on March 30, 2006
Can I post lame, empty comments that mock other users without specifying their names?
Apparently.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:32 PM on March 30, 2006
Apparently.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 12:32 PM on March 30, 2006
cortex: burn!
posted by sonofsamiam at 12:35 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by sonofsamiam at 12:35 PM on March 30, 2006
I hate everyone the same.
There are so many perfectly good reasons to hate someone on an individual basis, that lumping them all into some group only expidites the process.
posted by shnoz-gobblin at 12:46 PM on March 30, 2006
There are so many perfectly good reasons to hate someone on an individual basis, that lumping them all into some group only expidites the process.
posted by shnoz-gobblin at 12:46 PM on March 30, 2006
I suck and this post should be deleted.
posted by allen.spaulding at 2:16 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by allen.spaulding at 2:16 PM on March 30, 2006
I hate everyone the same.
Don't hate the players, hate the Motherfucking Snakes on the Motherfucking Plane.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 2:21 PM on March 30, 2006
Don't hate the players, hate the Motherfucking Snakes on the Motherfucking Plane.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 2:21 PM on March 30, 2006
(damn snakes...)
posted by shnoz-gobblin at 2:35 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by shnoz-gobblin at 2:35 PM on March 30, 2006
I hate you all and wish you idiots would get lives and quit sitting around reading the internet all day from your self-important rolling office chairs.
(Sorry, just wanted to see what it felt like... Really, I didn't mean it.)
posted by Roger Dodger at 4:06 PM on March 30, 2006
(Sorry, just wanted to see what it felt like... Really, I didn't mean it.)
posted by Roger Dodger at 4:06 PM on March 30, 2006
mathowie, why not ban people who make such worthless comments? I'd think you'd eventually get tired of being the little Dutch boy. Such comments will keep coming, faster and faster as more users sign up, until there are consequences for such behavior.
posted by nixerman at 5:03 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by nixerman at 5:03 PM on March 30, 2006
mathowie, why not ban people who make such worthless comments?
When it happens again and again and again (and again), maybe. Everyone has the occasional bad day, after all.
Then again, it's a fine line between loveable curmudgeon (of which we have more than a few) and disruptive noisemonkey (of which we have some, too). Hard to sort the shit from the shinola at the best of times.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:44 PM on March 30, 2006
When it happens again and again and again (and again), maybe. Everyone has the occasional bad day, after all.
Then again, it's a fine line between loveable curmudgeon (of which we have more than a few) and disruptive noisemonkey (of which we have some, too). Hard to sort the shit from the shinola at the best of times.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:44 PM on March 30, 2006
I don't get how certain users can be subjected to multiple timeouts and multiple deleted comments that immediately follow such timeouts, and yet still have accounts here.
posted by rxrfrx at 5:47 PM on March 30, 2006
posted by rxrfrx at 5:47 PM on March 30, 2006
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 11:06 AM on March 30, 2006