Can I repost it as an FPP? May 12, 2006 11:02 PM   Subscribe

I posted a link in a comment on the blue. Can I repost it as an FPP?
posted by anjamu to Etiquette/Policy at 11:02 PM (42 comments total)

Here's the comment.

As far as I can tell, it got lost in peeping_Thomist v. pretty much everyone else.

I think it's really a quality link, and it's related to a thread (er, that one) which got nearly 500 posts.
posted by anjamu at 11:04 PM on May 12, 2006


I think I've seen that before, but I don't know if it was in an FPP or another comment.
posted by delmoi at 11:13 PM on May 12, 2006


A cursory search (which I would have done were I to post it, I swear) reveals that I found the link in someone else's FPP anyhow.

This particular instance aside, is it kosher to post a link as an FPP if it gets a positive response in a thread?
posted by anjamu at 11:19 PM on May 12, 2006


sure. As long as you search to make sure it hasn't been posted before. You're quite the thorough noob, aren't you?
posted by puke & cry at 11:25 PM on May 12, 2006


You're quite the thorough noob, aren't you?

Sadly, yes.

I used to get made fun of for following the rules too much when I was little.
posted by anjamu at 11:41 PM on May 12, 2006


which got nearly 500 posts.

The thread has to do with abortion. Any thread that has to do with abortion will get tons of comments. Not a big deal.
posted by gtr at 11:50 PM on May 12, 2006


Sadly, yes.

Believe me, it's a welcome change.
posted by puke & cry at 11:57 PM on May 12, 2006


anjamu, do you jay walk?
posted by Chuckles at 12:14 AM on May 13, 2006


The thread has to do with abortion. Any thread that has to do with abortion will get tons of comments. Not a big deal.

Please note the controversial topics of metafiter which include: religion, abortion, obesity, and magic tricks.
posted by puke & cry at 12:23 AM on May 13, 2006


and mushrooms.
posted by bigmusic at 12:36 AM on May 13, 2006


Cat declawing is always good too, and Bush and...
You know someone should make a list, on second thought, perhaps not
posted by edgeways at 1:01 AM on May 13, 2006


Don't forget circumcision.
posted by greycap at 1:05 AM on May 13, 2006


Right then: religion, abortion, obesity, circumsion, magic tricks, cat declawing,
posted by puke & cry at 1:22 AM on May 13, 2006


and mushrooms.
posted by puke & cry at 1:22 AM on May 13, 2006


However, if by some chance you find footage of an overweight Bush stoned out of his mind on magic mushrooms, declawing a cat, showing off his circumcised penis, quoting the Old Testament in opposition to abortion, and then magically disappearing, you should consider breaking these rules and posting it to the blue.
posted by greycap at 3:40 AM on May 13, 2006


And go ahead and open a MeTa for your fpp when you do, on spec, and make it your [more inside]...
posted by paulsc at 3:59 AM on May 13, 2006


anjamu: the jokers here are pulling your leg. Reposting any link that has ever appeared on Metafilter before - whether as a comment, on a user page, or of course in an FPP - is grounds for immediate IP ban. Where possible, your employer will be notified as well, and in some cases people have had their wages garnished as a result.

Post carefully, and remember to have fun!
posted by Ryvar at 4:01 AM on May 13, 2006


Please note the controversial topics of metafiter which include: religion, abortion, obesity, and magic tricks, cat declawing, circumcision and mushrooms.

To which I add: Diamonds/DeBeers and bicycles.
posted by fixedgear at 4:16 AM on May 13, 2006


What's wrong with bicycles?!
posted by Lotto at 4:45 AM on May 13, 2006


Do a search on Critical Mass, Lotto. Every single such thread is a massive trainwreck.

I'm not sure why you listed diamonds, fixedgear - everyone pretty universally hates DeBeers.
posted by Ryvar at 4:48 AM on May 13, 2006


If the comment was in a recent FPP it would have to be pretty worthwhile standing on its own to merit its own post. If there is currently a post on the front page of MeFi that is on the same general topic, then starting a new thread isn't usually a good idea. Hot button topics like the ones people have mentioned and a few more -- gun control, Israel/Palestine, childbearing and drugs -- should probably go through an extra stage of personal review along the lines of "Even though my link has good information presentend reasonably, is there any chance that a MeFi thread on this topic will NOT become a huge messy flamewar shitstorm?" If the answer is yes, then you might want to try it.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 6:25 AM on May 13, 2006


If the comment was in a recent FPP it would have to be pretty worthwhile standing on its own to merit its own post.

Aren't links always supposed to be worthwhile standing on their own? My understanding is that it's irrelevant whether they'd been presented in comments (the theory presumably being that while everyone can be expected to scan the front page, no one can be reasonably expected to read all the comments to every thread, so most people won't have seen it). Whenever this has come up before, the response has always been "sure, if it was just in a comment, post it." Has policy changed?
posted by languagehat at 6:47 AM on May 13, 2006


is there any chance that a MeFi thread on this topic will ......become a huge messy flamewar shitstorm?" If the answer is yes, then you might want to try it
posted by adamvasco at 7:16 AM on May 13, 2006


Has policy changed?

I should have been clearer. I mean recent like "last two or three days" not recent like "last month or two". There is no policy against doing this. However, if there is a raging CIA scandal thread on the front page and you want the CIA scandal link you provided in your comment to get more attention so you post it to its own thread, there is a chance of it being considered just an updatefilter post.

Posts like this have sometimes been removed with the suggestion "post this in the already open CIA scandal thread still on the front page" so it might be worth noting somehow in the post that some other version of this topic is also being discussed.
posted by jessamyn (staff) at 7:20 AM on May 13, 2006


So the complete list goes: religion, abortion, obesity, circumsion, magic tricks, cat declawing, circumcision, mushrooms, bicycles, gun control, Israel/Palestine, childbearing and drugs. Or are there more?
posted by reklaw at 8:28 AM on May 13, 2006


Oops... put circumcision in there twice.
posted by reklaw at 8:30 AM on May 13, 2006


God, don't post it. It is a self-righteous op-ed that will only lead to a very predictable pissing match that could be cut and pasted from a dozen previous threads. It is not the best of the web.
posted by LarryC at 9:02 AM on May 13, 2006


LarryC, see here and don't worry.

jessamyn, thanks for chiming in. You're just the sort of person who I was hoping to hear from.

And everyone else, thanks for giving me an idea of what to avoid. Never realized cat declawing and magic tricks were so controversial.

What about puppy spaying? That one okay?
posted by anjamu at 1:18 PM on May 13, 2006


SUVs. Posts involving SUVs are potential flamewars, too.
posted by mr_roboto at 1:29 PM on May 13, 2006


Avoid politics, and look for cool stuff on the web.
posted by LarryC at 1:59 PM on May 13, 2006


...religion, abortion, obesity, circumsion, magic tricks, cat declawing, circumcision, mushrooms, bicycles, gun control, Israel/Palestine, childbearing and drugs.

Right there, you have all the ingredients for a truly successful house party.
posted by flashboy at 5:09 PM on May 13, 2006


So the complete list goes: religion, abortion, obesity, circumsion, magic tricks, cat declawing, circumcision, mushrooms, bicycles, gun control, Israel/Palestine, childbearing and drugs. Or are there more?

Hybrid Cars. Rap Music.
posted by delmoi at 5:28 PM on May 13, 2006


religion, abortion, obesity, circumsion, magic tricks, cat declawing, circumcision, mushrooms, bicycles, gun control, Israel/Palestine, childbearing and drugs. Or are there more?

That's hardly even a start. I mean, you forgot shaved pubic hair, deaf people, porn, tipping ... the list goes on.
posted by IshmaelGraves at 5:36 PM on May 13, 2006


shit, we should make a list of topics that DON'T provoke flamewars
posted by edgeways at 7:38 PM on May 13, 2006


shit, we should make a list of topics that DON'T provoke flamewars

*sound of crickets*
posted by brundlefly at 9:59 PM on May 13, 2006


So I posted a link as part of the [more inside] part of an FPP with many links, so it may not have been noticed. It's a really interesting conference on the future of tech/ai/robotics etc. 'Will Spiritual Robots Replace Humanity By 2100?', though it is a couple of years old.

Any thoughts on if it is worth giving it it's own post (presumably with some supporting links), as it seems like something peoples may enjoy.
posted by MetaMonkey at 2:10 AM on May 14, 2006


Sometimes yes
posted by caddis at 7:12 AM on May 14, 2006


Knitting doesn't provoke flamewars. Neither do bunnies or orange juice.
posted by arcticwoman at 1:39 PM on May 14, 2006


Knitting is lame, and you're lame for liking it.

*ducks*
posted by brundlefly at 2:51 PM on May 14, 2006


Bunnies eat my flowers and must be stopped.
posted by fixedgear at 4:18 PM on May 14, 2006


for posterity, and anjamu--The crunchland Method for making posts.
posted by carsonb at 9:04 AM on May 15, 2006


Knitting is lame, and you're lame for liking it.

No, Nudie suits are lame. And, uh, you smell bad.
posted by arcticwoman at 11:21 AM on May 15, 2006


« Older Too much information and not enough privacy?...   |   Request: a way to mark our questions as resolved. Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments