If a "reasonable person" in similar circumstances would feel threatened by an attack, that person may use all force reasonably necessary to prevent injury. An act of self-defense must ordinarily be proportional to the threat. If you believe a person is going to spit on you, depending upon the context it may be reasonable to push the person away, but it would not be reasonable to hit the person with a hammer.As the cliche goes, better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6, but everyone should know that the "stop punching when they are no longer able to punch you anymore" strategy can end in you being the one to be tried for battery (or worse.) One of many good reasons to make sure physical conflict remains the course of last resort.
I wonder what the MAWGs will do when they reach that phase.Wonder no more.
In the second video, we can see the cops just let him go. But actually I was going to post on that in the thread but it got deleted while I was typing. Ah well. But yeah, the idea that what he did was completely OK under "Self defense" is absurd.If a "reasonable person" in similar circumstances would feel threatened by an attack, that person may use all force reasonably necessary to prevent injury. An act of self-defense must ordinarily be proportional to the threat. If you believe a person is going to spit on you, depending upon the context it may be reasonable to push the person away, but it would not be reasonable to hit the person with a hammer.As the cliche goes, better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6, but everyone should know that the "stop punching when they are no longer able to punch you anymore" strategy can end in you being the one to be tried for battery (or worse.) One of many good reasons to make sure physical conflict remains the course of last resort.
posted by Pronoiac at 3:31 PM on February 17, 2010