posted by Sys Rq to Etiquette/Policy at 7:34 PM (101 comments total)
1 user marked this as a favorite
I'm assuming the meat of this post
is the video--a good video, which is worth watching, but which is described in the post and in the link only as containing graphic depictions of dead bombing victims.
The link in the post goes not to the YouTube-hosted video, but to a regurgitated press release for a debate hosted by an organization called Christians in the Media, tacked onto which is only the second part of the video out of three.
I just feel that the framing of a post is important, and that that one failed badly in several ways.
Am I wrong?