I do not care for the recent upsurge in images being posted to threads. June 6, 2002 5:50 AM Subscribe
Am I the only one who does not care for the recent upsurge in images being posted to threads? I hate to sound like my grandfather yelling at the kids in his yard, but it really irks me. I come here to read, not look at stupid images of Barney, fox medals and purses. Although, looking for the specific examples of the last two, maybe Matt has been deleting them?
I was drinky-drink the drunk boy last night, which explains (but does not excuse) the John Belushi in the mint julep thread and my own South Park yhbc (but boy, that thread just cried out for images). Likewise, I'll refrain if that's the consensus. I know images can be distracting, are band-width suckers, and will dumb the place down if used too much. Sorry if I have offended.
posted by yhbc at 6:39 AM on June 6, 2002
posted by yhbc at 6:39 AM on June 6, 2002
Previously discussed here and here, and elsewhere, but I'm lazy... moderation is the better part of valor, or something like that, is the consensus, I think.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:02 AM on June 6, 2002
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:02 AM on June 6, 2002
Am I the only one who does not care for the recent upsurge in images being posted to threads?
Uh, no. But then again...
Actually, my suggestion is post that Barney and Baby Bop pic to all I/P threads early and often.
For thread killer purposes, only, of course...
posted by y2karl at 7:11 AM on June 6, 2002
Uh, no. But then again...
Actually, my suggestion is post that Barney and Baby Bop pic to all I/P threads early and often.
For thread killer purposes, only, of course...
posted by y2karl at 7:11 AM on June 6, 2002
Actually, yhbc's Belushi pic in the julep thread is the ideal image post: it's small, unexpected, amusing, makes a point relevant to the discussion(the "drink the whiskey and throw away the mint" attitude) and, above all, is unrenderable in words.
Images are annoying when, like Barney, they're annoying in themselves or predictable or irrelevant. Otherwise I thing users generally strike the right balance as the odd image(odd in every sense)does liven up a thread. Though I'd say the smaller and the more original(preferably just personally photoshopped)the better.
posted by MiguelCardoso at 9:31 AM on June 6, 2002
Images are annoying when, like Barney, they're annoying in themselves or predictable or irrelevant. Otherwise I thing users generally strike the right balance as the odd image(odd in every sense)does liven up a thread. Though I'd say the smaller and the more original(preferably just personally photoshopped)the better.
posted by MiguelCardoso at 9:31 AM on June 6, 2002
Personally, I am waiting with bated breath for the first time someone posts a "Photoshop This!" thread on the front page.
posted by briank at 10:45 AM on June 6, 2002
posted by briank at 10:45 AM on June 6, 2002
Here's an example of a totally unacceptable and irrelevant image. Oh, be patient, revbrian and briank: it's my first!
posted by MiguelCardoso at 1:40 PM on June 6, 2002
posted by MiguelCardoso at 1:40 PM on June 6, 2002
I love the images. They break the monotony of words and are usually quite hilarious. A little comic relief isn't bad, in my opinion.
posted by sadie01221975 at 4:18 PM on June 6, 2002
posted by sadie01221975 at 4:18 PM on June 6, 2002
Hey, if you're fixin' to cook that, Miguel, save me a wing!
posted by rushmc at 6:46 PM on June 6, 2002
posted by rushmc at 6:46 PM on June 6, 2002
I stand behind my use of an image in the Napster post.
Besides, it's refreshing to see the occasional image in MetaFilter. Reminds me of LiveJournal... ;->
posted by insomnia_lj at 7:41 AM on June 7, 2002
Besides, it's refreshing to see the occasional image in MetaFilter. Reminds me of LiveJournal... ;->
posted by insomnia_lj at 7:41 AM on June 7, 2002
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 7:54 AM on June 7, 2002
posted by bittennails at 8:22 AM on June 7, 2002
Next week on MetaFilter: How to add the alt attribute to make those images work even harder for you!
Two weeks from now: Want to know how to hyperlink that image so that it's clickable? We'll show you how!
posted by iconomy at 9:29 AM on June 7, 2002
Two weeks from now: Want to know how to hyperlink that image so that it's clickable? We'll show you how!
posted by iconomy at 9:29 AM on June 7, 2002
Maybe that was a wee bit dark.
posted by dong_resin at 9:54 AM on June 7, 2002
posted by dong_resin at 9:54 AM on June 7, 2002
I hope you're not playing everquest, dong_resin. Then it would be dark.
posted by bittennails at 11:22 AM on June 7, 2002
posted by bittennails at 11:22 AM on June 7, 2002
On the bright side, dong_resin, you could probably think about an exciting career as a graphic artist. Can you draw a pirate?
posted by crunchland at 12:21 PM on June 7, 2002
posted by crunchland at 12:21 PM on June 7, 2002
great thread. honestly, amazing.
But images, imo, suck. metafilter is a place for sanity if not reason. I read here because y'all can write. and the content is not too shabby either. Yes, please, be funny. Yes, please take the piss. But try to do it with words. Unless it really warrants the pic.
This is an exception that proves the rule.
posted by zpousman at 8:49 PM on June 9, 2002
But images, imo, suck. metafilter is a place for sanity if not reason. I read here because y'all can write. and the content is not too shabby either. Yes, please, be funny. Yes, please take the piss. But try to do it with words. Unless it really warrants the pic.
This is an exception that proves the rule.
posted by zpousman at 8:49 PM on June 9, 2002
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by bittennails at 6:27 AM on June 6, 2002