19 posts tagged with deleted and policy. (View popular tags)
Displaying 1 through 19 of 19. Subscribe:
This is an example of a double that should have been left alone. [more inside]
posted by wfrgms
on Feb 13, 2008 -
38 comments
Hey guys, have any tips for improving the quality of my neighborhood feud? [more inside]
posted by thehmsbeagle
on Nov 13, 2007 -
41 comments
Why'd we go and kill this. Just because of this?
(more inside) [more inside]
posted by es_de_bah
on Sep 28, 2007 -
15 comments
WCityMike got me thinking with his recent thread. I like deleted thread. Frankly I think its uniqueness constitutes BOTW. So...would it violate the rules to do a blue post about it? (AFAIK no one has yet)
posted by allkindsoftime
on Feb 1, 2007 -
34 comments
OMFGAWWTDMTT: (Oh My F—kin' God Another 'Why Was This Deleted' Metatalk Thread). But, hopefully, a meta-OMFGAWWTDMTT thread. Jess, Matt, I like you guys, I really dig Metafilter, Ask Metafilter, Metatalk; I like the fact that there's good stuff here, healthy dollops of snark and cynicism, but overall what appear to be good people. But I'm having more and more difficulty discerning the criteria and rationales by which you guys delete threads, and I think that's a trend that's gonna bite the site's ass a little further down the road. More inside.
posted by WCityMike
on Jan 31, 2007 -
118 comments
I think it's a violation of the spirt of AskMe to repost derailing comments immediately after they've been deleted.
posted by Snyder
on Apr 19, 2006 -
2 comments
So why was the AskMe thread "must I eat the whole candy bar" deleted?
posted by Rash
on Nov 16, 2005 -
19 comments
If a comment is deleted, is the user notified? I commented in the roach question, and now it's gone. Is it because I used a bad word?
posted by hellbient
on Aug 16, 2005 -
11 comments
Look, that deleted thread had an interesting Q&A about #mefi where I learned quite a bit. You'll certainly delete this one, but did you even read it before you bombed it?
Bad job. Totally unreasonable.
posted by breezeway
on May 9, 2005 -
180 comments
Earlier today I posted a question about MeFi (how to turn off background color) in the main Ask MeFi area, which appeared for a few minutes then vanished. Did it likely get moved somewhere else, or just censored? for being in the wrong place? for expressing (in mild terms) dislike of a Mefi feature (I can't see text on colored background). Or did it just vanish into the ether?
posted by anadem
on Mar 20, 2005 -
4 comments
I don't think deleting Metatalk threads asking to clarify the deletions of Ask Metafilter threads is good for the community. [+]
posted by azazello
on Mar 9, 2005 -
55 comments
What's inappropriate?
Is there a guide for how racy a post can be? I posted a fairly racy (but funny, or at least I thought so) thing eariler and it was taken off. Did I step over the line?
posted by Shanachie
on Jan 30, 2005 -
6 comments
too graphic for metafilter?
posted by specialk420
on Jan 26, 2005 -
230 comments
I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank Matt for deleting the Invisibility/Flight thread in Ask.Me
posted by esch
on Jan 14, 2005 -
134 comments
The Final Nail. I haven't been reading as much lately---I'm am hoping that the election will be over soon so the excuses are gone for shitty posts. But, there it is.
A double post. It is a Newsfilter post, that isn't even news since it has been talked about for over a decade. It is clearly does not meet the stated standard. It is a classic troll: toss a turd that you *know* will incite much argument, for no apparent reason.. It is a single-link to a newspaper. It is a blatant amount of negative campaigning even while we try to encourage voting with a new link at the top of the page.
For the love of god, it is a self-Godwinizing post!
Matt posted the very next post, 30 minutes later, so there is no chance he didn't see the post.
Yet... it remains there on the blue.
It is the piece de resitance of the the shithole Matt has willingly allowed MeFi to become. I would say amazing if it wasn't so sad....
posted by Seth
on Sep 28, 2004 -
104 comments
QuestionableSwami, meet QuestionablePost.
posted by The Michael The
on Nov 2, 2003 -
31 comments
Something really got your knickers in a knot? Well, then, don't just put it on the front page once. Wait one day and post an update. Note that in this case, the update's new information is a week old and was already posted in the original thread.
posted by anapestic
on Oct 12, 2002 -
2 comments
Uncle Sam wants you ...
never to post no-link discussion threads.
posted by rcade
on Sep 18, 2001 -
15 comments
This thread sucks. The link doesn't jump down to the story, the subject matter isn't very funny or interesting, it's just stupid. The post is too long, the comments are pretty pointless. I would delete it, but it could create more trouble than it is worth. What should be done about sub-par links? Anything? Take the good with the bad?
posted by mathowie
on Aug 29, 2001 -
25 comments