Mozilla Issues January 3, 2003 12:56 AM Subscribe
is anyone else having problems posting in mozilla? i post, click preview and nothing is there.
it works fine for me in mozilla 1.1 and 1.21 on both mac and pc. quarsan. Can you try logging out and back in?
posted by mathowie (staff) at 1:07 AM on January 3, 2003
posted by mathowie (staff) at 1:07 AM on January 3, 2003
Ever consider using a browser that conforms with the de facto web standards?
Yeah, just bend over and take it like a man!
posted by inpHilltr8r at 1:42 AM on January 3, 2003
Yeah, just bend over and take it like a man!
posted by inpHilltr8r at 1:42 AM on January 3, 2003
I have no problems posting with Mozilla, other than the lameness of the comments themselves!
Mischief: Mozilla is standards compliant. IE is not. And last time I looked, it was not available for Linux or Solaris. (Not that I would use it if it was.)
posted by salmacis at 2:36 AM on January 3, 2003
Mischief: Mozilla is standards compliant. IE is not. And last time I looked, it was not available for Linux or Solaris. (Not that I would use it if it was.)
posted by salmacis at 2:36 AM on January 3, 2003
i think that's why they said "de facto".
no problems here, either with 1.0 - try deleting all cookies
posted by andrew cooke at 2:55 AM on January 3, 2003
no problems here, either with 1.0 - try deleting all cookies
posted by andrew cooke at 2:55 AM on January 3, 2003
microdick somehow fucked with my browser without my going there and without any autoupdate enabled. the other day it began asking me those inane questions it asks only when its new, you know, "you are about to send in info to an insecure blabla, would you like to woofwoof?" and last night i discovered that Tools | Internet Options | Security | Custom no longer works. i MUST choose a default security level, where all the individual options (i.e. "Allow paste operations from script") are prechosen. attempts to customize any of these items is futile. the radio buttons still appear - they simply refuse to respond to any clicking. i'm suitably pissed.
posted by quonsar at 5:14 AM on January 3, 2003
posted by quonsar at 5:14 AM on January 3, 2003
quonsar, that deeply sucks. What version are using? 6.something? I stuck with 5.5 because of reports that 6.0 broke stuff.
posted by Slithy_Tove at 6:08 AM on January 3, 2003
posted by Slithy_Tove at 6:08 AM on January 3, 2003
slithy tove, i am using 6.0, i'm away from home at the moment so i cant post the exact version now. this whole wintel thing is headed into shitland - the digital rights management OS is right around the corner, soon a computer will only do what the moguls want it to do. the promise of the internet is being stolen quite successfully. damn, i miss optimism.
posted by quonsar at 6:43 AM on January 3, 2003
posted by quonsar at 6:43 AM on January 3, 2003
All this is precisely why I chucked my PC's and got an iBook. OSX rules, MSFT drools.
Incidentally (or, you know, on topic), having no problems with Mozilla, aside from being blinded by its utter coolness.
posted by padraigin at 9:54 AM on January 3, 2003
Incidentally (or, you know, on topic), having no problems with Mozilla, aside from being blinded by its utter coolness.
posted by padraigin at 9:54 AM on January 3, 2003
now if they could only get mozilla to work with the MeFi formatting and link building functions...
And if only rays of beaming light weren't so fscking expensive
posted by BentPenguin at 11:55 AM on January 3, 2003
And if only rays of beaming light weren't so fscking expensive
posted by BentPenguin at 11:55 AM on January 3, 2003
And if only rays of beaming light weren't so fscking expensive
beat me to it.
posted by adampsyche at 3:11 PM on January 3, 2003
beat me to it.
posted by adampsyche at 3:11 PM on January 3, 2003
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
posted by mischief at 1:01 AM on January 3, 2003