Maybe I already AM stoned June 26, 2001 7:15 PM   Subscribe

I say that tonight, to those who flame we respond as though we're stoned no? Now wouldn't that be irritating?

BTW. I don't expect anyone to actually do it nor post on this thread.
posted by crasspastor to Etiquette/Policy at 7:15 PM (12 comments total)

Dave's not here crasspastor.
posted by thirteen at 7:57 PM on June 26, 2001

posted by lbergstr at 9:41 PM on June 26, 2001

There is no coterie.™
posted by daveadams at 6:21 AM on June 27, 2001

You'll have to excuse crassy, he was a bit baked when starting this thread.

There is no coalition.™
posted by norm at 8:17 AM on June 27, 2001

Zippity Plot!™

posted by norm at 8:18 AM on June 27, 2001

Now I'm encouraging him. Sorry.
posted by norm at 8:19 AM on June 27, 2001

Norm, you are quickly becoming more annoying than I am.
posted by daveadams at 11:58 AM on June 27, 2001

...we respond as though we're stoned...

How would this be any different from most users' normal posts?
posted by harmful at 12:24 PM on June 27, 2001

Well, if you're stoned, you probably won't work up the energy to reply at all. Could be a good thing in some cases.
posted by kindall at 7:52 PM on June 27, 2001

dave, you're just jealous that he does it do well...
posted by fooljay at 10:29 PM on June 27, 2001

Hrm... number of flame-inducing threads on MeFi... *taps on calculator* ...cumulative flame-material plus cross-talk... *tap* ... source code, graphics... *tappa, tappa* ...assorted media... *tippity Tap*

Yes, I believe there's enough here for 2.5 tons of flammage to be sent directly to one's doorstep.

Please sign here, here, and here. Thanks.
posted by salsamander at 9:41 AM on June 28, 2001

*tippity Tap*

You're just begging dave to chime in, aren't you?

posted by jpoulos at 8:10 PM on June 28, 2001

« Older Question for Matt   |   Does MetaFilter need to be a nurturing environment... Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments