Double Submitting Comments September 13, 2005 11:09 AM Subscribe
This isn't about double posts but double posts inside a post. Or something like that, MI.
I think it's noise. But apparently a lot of people find spelling corrections and apologies to be valuable contributions to the site, so I imagine you'll get a herd saying the same here.
posted by cribcage at 11:14 AM on September 13, 2005
posted by cribcage at 11:14 AM on September 13, 2005
I guess it doesn't really matter what people here prefer, PurplePorpoise. Since not everyone reads MetaTalk, even if in this thread we did agree on what we do or do not prefer, the people that never read the thread will continue to do whatever it is that they do.
What do you prefer?
posted by iconomy at 11:15 AM on September 13, 2005
What do you prefer?
posted by iconomy at 11:15 AM on September 13, 2005
There was a member not that long ago who kept adding comments to correct his spelling mistakes so that one comment would turn into five. That got old very quickly.
I've found that Matt and Jessamyn are really pretty amazingly quick about deleting the accidental second postings if you flag them.
Maybe it would be a good idea to add "accidental comment" to the list of flags?
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005
I've found that Matt and Jessamyn are really pretty amazingly quick about deleting the accidental second postings if you flag them.
Maybe it would be a good idea to add "accidental comment" to the list of flags?
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005
Oops, I guess the double post works for that. Doh!
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005
The fact that I have to scroll another 1/8 of an inch only to see someone's apology for a previous spelling/posting transgression, irks me to no end. It puts unneccessary load on the servers and takes up valuable time that I could be otherwise using to post useless shit like what I'm writing here.
I kid because I'm bored
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 11:57 AM on September 13, 2005
I kid because I'm bored
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 11:57 AM on September 13, 2005
If you flag your own double posted comment as a double post, we'll usually see it and just remove the extra one.
posted by jessamyn at 11:58 AM on September 13, 2005
posted by jessamyn at 11:58 AM on September 13, 2005
I flag 'em and move on. People should shut the fuck up.
posted by klangklangston at 12:02 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by klangklangston at 12:02 PM on September 13, 2005
flag 'em and move on. People should shut the fuck up.
Another phrase which should be put at the head of every page!
posted by Decani at 12:10 PM on September 13, 2005
Another phrase which should be put at the head of every page!
posted by Decani at 12:10 PM on September 13, 2005
Shoot them all.
posted by loquacious at 12:48 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by loquacious at 12:48 PM on September 13, 2005
Let dios sort it out.
posted by If I Had An Anus at 12:54 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by If I Had An Anus at 12:54 PM on September 13, 2005
*zing*
posted by loquacious at 12:56 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by loquacious at 12:56 PM on September 13, 2005
Double post :-) Not really, but I couldn't resist.
Self flag-ellation seems to be the best remedy.
posted by birdsquared at 1:21 PM on September 13, 2005
Self flag-ellation seems to be the best remedy.
posted by birdsquared at 1:21 PM on September 13, 2005
All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 2:47 PM on September 13 [!]
All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:06 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by Smart Dalek at 2:47 PM on September 13 [!]
All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:06 PM on September 13, 2005
All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:07 PM PST on September 13 [!]
Chicks hate triple post guy.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 3:25 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:07 PM PST on September 13 [!]
Chicks hate triple post guy.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 3:25 PM on September 13, 2005
Shoot them all.
Don't you have to nuke them till they glow first?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:00 PM on September 13, 2005
Don't you have to nuke them till they glow first?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:00 PM on September 13, 2005
All the old-school chicks dig DoublePostGuy.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 10:39 PM on September 13, 2005
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 10:39 PM on September 13, 2005
Can I just use this as a place to air my annoyance with people in askme always saying "My google-fu is failing me"? I mean isn't it understood that if you're asking something, then you've already looked elsewhere and not found what you needed?
Maybe I'm just cranky.
posted by glenwood at 1:49 PM on September 14, 2005
Maybe I'm just cranky.
posted by glenwood at 1:49 PM on September 14, 2005
People mention the failure of their google-fu so that others will not snark at them for failing to use google.
posted by anapestic at 1:59 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by anapestic at 1:59 PM on September 14, 2005
*spearheads a grass-roots movement to popularize the alternative phrase 'my google skillz == teh sux' just to prove to glenwood that it could be worse*
posted by cortex at 3:55 PM on September 14, 2005
posted by cortex at 3:55 PM on September 14, 2005
glenwood : "I mean isn't it understood that if you're asking something, then you've already looked elsewhere and not found what you needed?"
Naw, it's understood that if you're asking something, then you were supposed to have looked elsewhere and not found what you needed. Pointing out that you googled is stating that you actually did do what you were supposed to do, which is something that can't be taken for granted.
posted by Bugbread at 3:56 PM on September 14, 2005
Naw, it's understood that if you're asking something, then you were supposed to have looked elsewhere and not found what you needed. Pointing out that you googled is stating that you actually did do what you were supposed to do, which is something that can't be taken for granted.
posted by Bugbread at 3:56 PM on September 14, 2005
What if instead of begging a lack of google-fu, people link to the various google search term(s) with operators that they tried.
It would encourage people who found answers through the awesomeness of their google-fu to additionally educate the foo-less in how to enstrengthen their fu?
A-Ha! Your kung-fu is weak! Your white tiger style surely will never beat the fury of my three flying bunny style!
posted by PurplePorpoise at 7:08 PM on September 14, 2005
It would encourage people who found answers through the awesomeness of their google-fu to additionally educate the foo-less in how to enstrengthen their fu?
A-Ha! Your kung-fu is weak! Your white tiger style surely will never beat the fury of my three flying bunny style!
posted by PurplePorpoise at 7:08 PM on September 14, 2005
which is something that can't be taken for granted
This makes me sad. But yes, I am whiney at times.
posted by glenwood at 8:17 PM on September 14, 2005
This makes me sad. But yes, I am whiney at times.
posted by glenwood at 8:17 PM on September 14, 2005
Technically and quibblingly, it's a double comment, not a double post. The post is that initial submission which starts the thread. Submissions attached to it are comments. The post and the comments together are a thread.
I do recognize that there is some overlapping use of posts, comments, submissions, etc., but I try to keep them distinct.
posted by Mo Nickels at 8:53 PM on September 14, 2005
I do recognize that there is some overlapping use of posts, comments, submissions, etc., but I try to keep them distinct.
posted by Mo Nickels at 8:53 PM on September 14, 2005
overlapping use of posts - do you have any pictures? Especially the distinct ones?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:38 AM on September 15, 2005
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:38 AM on September 15, 2005
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
My question is; do people here prefer if people apologized for their repeat post (but thus adds another block of text) or do we all assume that the error was totally unintentional and that the perpetrator of the error feels due remorse and embarasement for the due length of time and as such has no need to apologize for their error?
Sorry if this is a repeat post, but results overwhelming refer to different users re-posting an FPP that has previously been posted (and if so I will feel my due remorse and embarasement for the due length of time).
posted by PurplePorpoise at 11:11 AM on September 13, 2005