Double Submitting Comments September 13, 2005 11:09 AM   Subscribe

This isn't about double posts but double posts inside a post. Or something like that, MI.
posted by PurplePorpoise to Etiquette/Policy at 11:09 AM (27 comments total)

Sometimes inside a thread someone will hit submit twice by accident and it results in a repeated post.

My question is; do people here prefer if people apologized for their repeat post (but thus adds another block of text) or do we all assume that the error was totally unintentional and that the perpetrator of the error feels due remorse and embarasement for the due length of time and as such has no need to apologize for their error?

Sorry if this is a repeat post, but results overwhelming refer to different users re-posting an FPP that has previously been posted (and if so I will feel my due remorse and embarasement for the due length of time).
posted by PurplePorpoise at 11:11 AM on September 13, 2005


I think it's noise. But apparently a lot of people find spelling corrections and apologies to be valuable contributions to the site, so I imagine you'll get a herd saying the same here.
posted by cribcage at 11:14 AM on September 13, 2005


I guess it doesn't really matter what people here prefer, PurplePorpoise. Since not everyone reads MetaTalk, even if in this thread we did agree on what we do or do not prefer, the people that never read the thread will continue to do whatever it is that they do.

What do you prefer?
posted by iconomy at 11:15 AM on September 13, 2005


There was a member not that long ago who kept adding comments to correct his spelling mistakes so that one comment would turn into five. That got old very quickly.

I've found that Matt and Jessamyn are really pretty amazingly quick about deleting the accidental second postings if you flag them.

Maybe it would be a good idea to add "accidental comment" to the list of flags?
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005


Oops, I guess the double post works for that. Doh!
posted by fenriq at 11:27 AM on September 13, 2005


The fact that I have to scroll another 1/8 of an inch only to see someone's apology for a previous spelling/posting transgression, irks me to no end. It puts unneccessary load on the servers and takes up valuable time that I could be otherwise using to post useless shit like what I'm writing here.

I kid because I'm bored
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 11:57 AM on September 13, 2005


If you flag your own double posted comment as a double post, we'll usually see it and just remove the extra one.
posted by jessamyn at 11:58 AM on September 13, 2005


I flag 'em and move on. People should shut the fuck up.
posted by klangklangston at 12:02 PM on September 13, 2005


flag 'em and move on. People should shut the fuck up.

Another phrase which should be put at the head of every page!
posted by Decani at 12:10 PM on September 13, 2005


Shoot them all.
posted by loquacious at 12:48 PM on September 13, 2005


Let dios sort it out.
posted by If I Had An Anus at 12:54 PM on September 13, 2005


*zing*
posted by loquacious at 12:56 PM on September 13, 2005


Double post :-) Not really, but I couldn't resist.

Self flag-ellation seems to be the best remedy.
posted by birdsquared at 1:21 PM on September 13, 2005


All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 2:47 PM on September 13 [!]

All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:06 PM on September 13, 2005


All the chicks dig double post guy.
posted by Smart Dalek at 3:07 PM PST on September 13 [!]

Chicks hate triple post guy.
posted by Armitage Shanks at 3:25 PM on September 13, 2005


Shoot them all.
Don't you have to nuke them till they glow first?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:00 PM on September 13, 2005


All the old-school chicks dig DoublePostGuy.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 10:39 PM on September 13, 2005


MetaFilter: People should shut the fuck up.
posted by zerokey at 9:19 AM on September 14, 2005


Can I just use this as a place to air my annoyance with people in askme always saying "My google-fu is failing me"? I mean isn't it understood that if you're asking something, then you've already looked elsewhere and not found what you needed?

Maybe I'm just cranky.
posted by glenwood at 1:49 PM on September 14, 2005


People mention the failure of their google-fu so that others will not snark at them for failing to use google.
posted by anapestic at 1:59 PM on September 14, 2005


Yea I know. sigh.
posted by glenwood at 2:21 PM on September 14, 2005


*spearheads a grass-roots movement to popularize the alternative phrase 'my google skillz == teh sux' just to prove to glenwood that it could be worse*
posted by cortex at 3:55 PM on September 14, 2005


glenwood : "I mean isn't it understood that if you're asking something, then you've already looked elsewhere and not found what you needed?"

Naw, it's understood that if you're asking something, then you were supposed to have looked elsewhere and not found what you needed. Pointing out that you googled is stating that you actually did do what you were supposed to do, which is something that can't be taken for granted.
posted by Bugbread at 3:56 PM on September 14, 2005


What if instead of begging a lack of google-fu, people link to the various google search term(s) with operators that they tried.

It would encourage people who found answers through the awesomeness of their google-fu to additionally educate the foo-less in how to enstrengthen their fu?

A-Ha! Your kung-fu is weak! Your white tiger style surely will never beat the fury of my three flying bunny style!
posted by PurplePorpoise at 7:08 PM on September 14, 2005


which is something that can't be taken for granted

This makes me sad. But yes, I am whiney at times.
posted by glenwood at 8:17 PM on September 14, 2005


Technically and quibblingly, it's a double comment, not a double post. The post is that initial submission which starts the thread. Submissions attached to it are comments. The post and the comments together are a thread.

I do recognize that there is some overlapping use of posts, comments, submissions, etc., but I try to keep them distinct.
posted by Mo Nickels at 8:53 PM on September 14, 2005


overlapping use of posts - do you have any pictures? Especially the distinct ones?
posted by Kirth Gerson at 4:38 AM on September 15, 2005


« Older Interesting profiles   |   San Francisco Meetup Newer »

You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments