How do I search for links on Metafilter? December 27, 2005 10:31 AM Subscribe
This might be a pony request, I'm not sure, though...
While doing a bit of research for a possible FPP in the blue, (to avoid posting something that already had been) I was wondering if there was a way to search MeFi for given links.
In other words, say I found some new, interesting information about a widget that had already been discussed on MeFi - sort of a follow-up, hey, lookit what they're doing now-kind-of-thing.
Is there any way to quickly check if the sites I found had already been linked without reading through pages and pages of comments and multiple threads to make sure it hadn't already happened on MeFi? A straight URL checker or something? Or is there a search-engine technique I'm ignorant of that would prove useful. Finally, should I have taken this to AskMeFi?
While doing a bit of research for a possible FPP in the blue, (to avoid posting something that already had been) I was wondering if there was a way to search MeFi for given links.
In other words, say I found some new, interesting information about a widget that had already been discussed on MeFi - sort of a follow-up, hey, lookit what they're doing now-kind-of-thing.
Is there any way to quickly check if the sites I found had already been linked without reading through pages and pages of comments and multiple threads to make sure it hadn't already happened on MeFi? A straight URL checker or something? Or is there a search-engine technique I'm ignorant of that would prove useful. Finally, should I have taken this to AskMeFi?
crunchland wrote a good guide to how this is done: posted by mathowie (staff) at 10:34 AM on December 27, 2005
You could use the Google search feature (click search above), but I'm not sure if google will search for a URL embedded within HTML or not.
There has to be some functional Google tweek to do that...
posted by SweetJesus at 10:34 AM on December 27, 2005
There has to be some functional Google tweek to do that...
posted by SweetJesus at 10:34 AM on December 27, 2005
Also, you were correct in your initial (acted on) assumption that this belongs in MetaTalk, not AskMe. It is a question, but it's a question about Metafilter, so it belongs here in the grey.
posted by Bugbread at 10:39 AM on December 27, 2005
posted by Bugbread at 10:39 AM on December 27, 2005
Mathowie - following that guideline, would I enter the URL in the main text field, or in the URL field of the posting form?
posted by TeamBilly at 10:48 AM on December 27, 2005
posted by TeamBilly at 10:48 AM on December 27, 2005
Google can take a URL and return all the sites it knows of which link to it. Run this through Google:
link:http://www.metafilter.com
you'll get all the sites that link to the metafilter homepage.
Try this with a site you're interested in and scan the results for "metafilter." If you show the maximum results per page and use your find-in-page feature, this can be reasonably fast.
This will help you find links in Metafilter comments as well as posts, which is not true of the process crunchland laid out (see above).
posted by scarabic at 11:00 AM on December 27, 2005
link:http://www.metafilter.com
you'll get all the sites that link to the metafilter homepage.
Try this with a site you're interested in and scan the results for "metafilter." If you show the maximum results per page and use your find-in-page feature, this can be reasonably fast.
This will help you find links in Metafilter comments as well as posts, which is not true of the process crunchland laid out (see above).
posted by scarabic at 11:00 AM on December 27, 2005
Use the URL field, and it'll search for that string.
posted by mathowie (staff) at 11:00 AM on December 27, 2005
posted by mathowie (staff) at 11:00 AM on December 27, 2005
One of hte problems with searching for URLs is that the URL for the "same" page might not be consistent. E.g., many content management systems can have their URLs arranged differently and still produce the same page. And the "www." can generally be omitted.
So: It's good to look for repeated URLs, but that's not really sufficient to pre-flag a double. (Assuming that what you want to do is avoid posting one.)
posted by lodurr at 11:29 AM on December 27, 2005
So: It's good to look for repeated URLs, but that's not really sufficient to pre-flag a double. (Assuming that what you want to do is avoid posting one.)
posted by lodurr at 11:29 AM on December 27, 2005
My advice would be to just make a good faith attempt at searching for it through the search box at the top of the screen.
For instance, my recent post about Israeli response to the terrorism at the 1972 Munich Olympics: I did a search for "Munich Olympics" and got all the posts in the past about it. I also searched for the url, and nothing was there. There wasn't anything that covered the article that I wanted to share, so I posted away. The post thing has an automatic checker that will check to see if a specific url has been posted before, but things change hosts and domain structures, so I wouldn't rely on that.
In the end, though, we can only ask that people make a good faith effort to check for it. If you do make the effort, and it doesn't show up, we can't hold you at fault. Yes, your post might be deleted, but that isn't tragic or punishment and shouldn't be percieved that way.
The only real problem is when people don't even make good faith efforts to check.
posted by dios at 11:37 AM on December 27, 2005
For instance, my recent post about Israeli response to the terrorism at the 1972 Munich Olympics: I did a search for "Munich Olympics" and got all the posts in the past about it. I also searched for the url, and nothing was there. There wasn't anything that covered the article that I wanted to share, so I posted away. The post thing has an automatic checker that will check to see if a specific url has been posted before, but things change hosts and domain structures, so I wouldn't rely on that.
In the end, though, we can only ask that people make a good faith effort to check for it. If you do make the effort, and it doesn't show up, we can't hold you at fault. Yes, your post might be deleted, but that isn't tragic or punishment and shouldn't be percieved that way.
The only real problem is when people don't even make good faith efforts to check.
posted by dios at 11:37 AM on December 27, 2005
scarabic: It would be faster and easier to do
"link:http://url site:metafilter.com" However I tried that earlier, but I couldn't think of any links posted long enough ago to show up on google.
posted by delmoi at 12:19 PM on December 27, 2005
"link:http://url site:metafilter.com" However I tried that earlier, but I couldn't think of any links posted long enough ago to show up on google.
posted by delmoi at 12:19 PM on December 27, 2005
"link:http://url site:metafilter.com"
oo cool - didn't know you could combine them like that
maybe matt should add that to the "post a link" page :)
posted by scarabic at 12:40 PM on December 27, 2005
oo cool - didn't know you could combine them like that
maybe matt should add that to the "post a link" page :)
posted by scarabic at 12:40 PM on December 27, 2005
Yeah. That would be cool. Wish I seen that before I hit the post button on the FPP I just made. This was after more than an hour of carefully checking the links, mind you, but now I'm wondering if I missed something. (sigh)
posted by TeamBilly at 1:11 PM on December 27, 2005
posted by TeamBilly at 1:11 PM on December 27, 2005
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments